Biomechanical analysis of anterior pelvic ring fractures with intact peripelvic soft tissues: a cadaveric study.

PURPOSE: Biomechanical studies of the pelvis are usually performed using dissected pelvic specimens or synthetic bones. Thereby the stabilising effect of the surrounding soft tissues is analysed insufficiently. Biomechanical data for isolated anterior pelvic ring fractures are currently missing. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop a novel testing device for biomechanical analyses of the pelvis and to investigate two different anterior pelvic ring fractures in a cadaveric model with intact peripelvic soft tissues. METHODS: A new biomechanical table construction which enables the fixation and testing of complete cadaveric specimens was developed. It was used to investigate the relative motion and stiffness changes due to unilateral osteotomy of the superior and inferior pubic ramus. Five cadavers with a mean age of 55.6 years (± 15.53 years) were included and loaded with a sinusoidal, cyclic (1 Hz), compressive force of up to 365 N over ten cycles for each condition. RESULTS: Biomechanical testing of the pelvis with complete appended soft tissues was feasible. Native stiffness without a pelvic fracture was 64.31 N/mm (± 8.33 N/mm). A standardised unilateral osteotomy of the superior pubic ramus reduced the stiffness under isolated axial load by 2% (63.05 N/mm ± 7.45 N/mm, p = 0.690). Additional osteotomy of the inferior pubic ramus caused a further, statistically not significant, decrease by 5% (59.57 N/mm ± 6.84 N/mm, p = 0.310). CONCLUSIONS: The developed test device was successfully used for biomechanical analyses of the pelvis with intact peripelvic soft tissues. In a first study, isolated unilateral fractures of the anterior pelvic ring showed no relevant biomechanical variation compared to the intact situation under isolated axial load. Only 7% of the measured stiffness was created by both unilateral pubic rami. Therefore, the clinical practice to treat unilateral anterior pelvic ring fractures conservatively is supported by the results of this study.

Accuracy of navigated and conventional iliosacral screw placement in B- and C-type pelvic ring fractures.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study is to report the institutions experiences with standardized 2D computer-navigated percutaneous iliosacral screw placement (CNS), as well as the conventional fluoroscopically assisted screw placement method (CF) over a period of 10 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 604 patients with sacral fractures (OTA B and C) were treated at the institution. Cases with both, a preoperative and postoperative CT scan were included for further analysis. With this prerequisite, a total of 136 cases were included. The quality of screw positioning, length of operation and intraoperative radiation exposure were recorded and compared. Moreover, it was analyzed whether the presence of dysmorphic sacra influenced the precision of screw positioning. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-two screws were implanted in 136 patients (100 navigated, 36 conventional). The duration of the average procedure was similar in the two groups [49.8 min (p = 0.7) conventional group (CF) vs. 48.0 min computer-navigated (CNS) group]. With computer navigation, radiation exposure was significantly reduced by almost half [128.3 vs. 65.2 s (p = 0.023)]. Screw placement was more accurate in the navigation group (79.03% CF vs. 86.47% CNS). The presence of dysmorphic sacral foramina or an increased alar slope increased the incidence of screw malpositioning. CONCLUSION: The conventional percutaneous method and a standardized 2D navigated method have similar rates of malpositioning. Dysmorphic upper sacral foramina and increased alar slope were identified as risk factors for screw malpositioning. Radiation exposure rates were reduced by half when using computer navigation. Therefore, computer navigation in iliosacral screw placement is recommended as method of choice.