Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Soc Sci Med ; 41(12): 1647-51, 1995 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8746864

ABSTRACT

We interviewed 64 parents by questionnaire after completion of a clinical trial involving their children for their perceptions and attitudes about informed consent. The results show that only a small minority realized that drug trials are designed to assess not only efficacy but safety as well. More worrisome was the majority of parents who felt that drug trials conducted by hospitals are of no or low risks. Moreover, a significant minority offered the view that the strict informed consent procedures we followed were unnecessary because they would do what the doctor advised. Even more worrisome was the small percentage of parents who realized that a signed consent form was primarily meant to protect their rights, and only one-third of the parents knew of their right to withdraw their child unconditionally from the trial at any time. These findings suggest that there may be significant attitudinal barriers to parental understanding of the informed consent process.


Subject(s)
Attitude , Clinical Trials as Topic/legislation & jurisprudence , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Legal Guardians/psychology , Parents/psychology , Administration, Oral , Anti-Allergic Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Asthma/drug therapy , Asthma/psychology , Australia , Child , Child, Preschool , Clinical Trials as Topic/psychology , Double-Blind Method , Drug Approval/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Humans , Infant , Ketotifen/adverse effects , Ketotifen/therapeutic use , Male , Safety/legislation & jurisprudence , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Med Ethics ; 21(4): 225-8, 1995 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7473642

ABSTRACT

The issue of aftercare for participants in clinical research was explored in the context of an asthma drug trial. Although there may be financial constraints and practical difficulties with implementation, the results show that it may be feasible for clinical investigators and commercial sponsors to take on some limited responsibility for the medical care of research subjects after clinical trials. However, the ethical implications for this practice remain unclear. On the one hand, society may have a moral obligation to compensate and reward some of its members who assume the risk of research subjects for the benefit of society as a whole. On the other hand, the promise of aftercare may provide an inducement to volunteers which, under certain conditions may be considered morally wrong and scientifically unsound.


Subject(s)
Aftercare , Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Asthma/drug therapy , Compensation and Redress , Ethics, Medical , Ketotifen/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/standards , Research Subjects , Australia , Comprehension , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Infant , Moral Obligations , Therapeutic Human Experimentation
3.
Soc Sci Med ; 40(11): 1573-7, 1995 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7667661

ABSTRACT

We interviewed 64 parents by questionnaire after completion of a clinical trial involving their children for their perceptions and attitudes about informed consent. The results show that only a small minority realised that drug trials are designed to assess not only efficacy but safety as well. More worrisome was the majority of parents who felt that drug trials conducted by hospitals are of no or low risks. Moreover, a significant minority offered the view that the strict informed consent procedures we followed were unnecessary because they would do what the doctor advised. Even more worrisome was the small percentage of parents who realised that a signed consent form was primarily meant to protect their rights, and only one-third of the parents knew of their right to withdraw their child unconditionally from the trial at any time. These findings suggest that there may be significant attitudinal barriers to parental understanding of the informed consent process.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Clinical Trials as Topic/psychology , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Parents/psychology , Adult , Asthma/drug therapy , Child, Preschool , Clinical Trials as Topic/legislation & jurisprudence , Double-Blind Method , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Infant , Ketotifen/adverse effects , Ketotifen/therapeutic use , Legal Guardians/psychology , Male , Patient Education as Topic/legislation & jurisprudence
4.
J Paediatr Child Health ; 28(6): 442-6, 1992 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1466940

ABSTRACT

The efficacy of Ketotifen was examined in the treatment of 113 infants between 6 and 36 months of age presenting with a history of cough and/or wheeze in a multicentre randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study. A 4 week no-medication baseline phase preceded the 16 week treatment phase in which infants took 2.5 mL twice daily of either placebo or Ketotifen (0.5 mg) syrup; this was followed by a 4 week wash-out phase. Diary card evaluation was performed by the parent or guardian for the duration of the study and recorded wheeze and cough twice daily as well as medication used. The percentage of symptom-free days decreased significantly in both groups (P < 0.005) with placebo-treated infants experiencing significantly more symptom-free days compared with the Ketotifen group (P < 0.01), although this difference was never more than 10% in any 4 week treatment period. Symptom severity scores and use of beta-agonist medication were also less in the placebo-treated infants but did not reach statistical significance. This study was unable to show a therapeutic advantage of Ketotifen over placebo in this group of infants with chronic cough and/or wheeze and the apparent statistical advantage of placebo is not a clinically relevant finding.


Subject(s)
Cough/drug therapy , Ketotifen/therapeutic use , Respiratory Sounds , Child, Preschool , Chronic Disease , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Infant , Ketotifen/adverse effects , Male , Respiratory Tract Diseases/drug therapy
5.
Med Educ ; 26(4): 321-6, 1992 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1630335

ABSTRACT

We surveyed 403 students in their clinical years for their perceptions of the quality of clinical clerkships. Between 42.6 and 67.0% of tutorials were said to contain positive factors such as a relaxed teaching atmosphere, enthusiasm, a good selection of patients and adequate preparation. Negative features in 18.2-37.2% of tutorials included unreasonable expectations, conflicting information, late arrival, early departure, failure to show up and the display of anger, a patronizing attitude, favouritism or ridicule. While two-thirds of tutors were regarded as friendly and helpful, the remaining one-third were perceived as unconcerned, discouraging, derogatory or hostile. Overall, only half the clinical tutors were rated as effective teachers; more specifically in medicine and psychiatry, less than one-third of consultants were regarded as effective teachers, as compared with some two-thirds of consultants in obstetrics and gynaecology and paediatrics who were so regarded. Almost two-thirds of the students had predominantly positive reactions to interactions with their tutors, in terms of being motivated to learn, enthused about the subject and having their self-confidence increased. Some one-quarter had negative reactions such as indifference, depression, anger, embarrassment and fearfulness. However, the impact of student-tutor interactions was mainly confined to the students' academic well-being, with little effect on their personal-social lives. Finally, one-third of students had experienced at least some form of mistreatment by their tutors, including gender, appearance, religious and racial discrimination, unfair grading and public humiliation. These findings suggest that the clinical clerkship may not be providing an optimal learning environment for medical students.


Subject(s)
Clinical Clerkship , Interpersonal Relations , Students, Medical/psychology , Teaching/standards , Clinical Clerkship/standards , Humans , Learning
6.
J Med Ethics ; 18(2): 86-93, 1992 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1619628

ABSTRACT

Three standard psychometric tests were administered to parents who volunteered their children for a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial of a new asthma drug and to a control group of parents whose children were eligible for the trial but had declined the invitation. The trial took place at a children's hospital in Australia. The subjects comprised 68 parents who had volunteered their children and 42 who had not, a participation rate of 94 per cent and 70 per cent, respectively. The responses of these parents to the Gordon Survey of Interpersonal Values Questionnaire, the Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory and the Cattell Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire were analysed by computer. There was a marked difference between the psychological profiles of the two groups of parents. Volunteering parents put more value on benevolence while non-volunteering parents were more concerned with power and prestige. The self-esteem of volunteering parents was much lower than that of non-volunteering parents. Finally, volunteering parents were more introverted, exhibited greater anxiety and low supergo, while non-volunteering parents appeared to have greater social confidence and emotional stability. Since an individual's values, self-esteem and personality may be important antecedents of behaviour, these findings suggest that parents who volunteer their children for clinical research are not only socially disadvantaged and emotionally vulnerable, but may also be psychologically predisposed to volunteering. Furthermore, these findings provide evidence for the existence of a psychosocial 'filter' effect of the informed consent procedure, which may be discouraging the better educated, more privileged and psychologically resilient members of society from participation as research subjects.


Subject(s)
Ketotifen/therapeutic use , Parental Consent , Parents/psychology , Personality , Research , Volunteers/psychology , Australia , Beneficence , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Humans , Personality Assessment , Persons , Power, Psychological , Self Concept , Social Class , Social Values , Therapeutic Human Experimentation , Vulnerable Populations
8.
Med Educ ; 24(6): 488-98, 1990 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2266885

ABSTRACT

A comparison of 121 mature-age and 270 normal-age entrants who graduated from the University of Queensland Medical School between 1972 and 1987 shows that mature-age entrants are some 7 years older, are more likely to come from public (state) schools and less likely to have parents in professional/technical occupations. Otherwise, the two groups were similar in terms of gender, marital status, number of children, ethnic background and current practice location. The educational background of mature-age entrants prior to admission includes 44.6% with degrees in health-science areas and 31.4% with degrees in non-health areas. Reasons for delayed entry of mature-age entrants include late consideration of medicine as a career (34.7%), financial problems (31.4%), dissatisfaction with previous career (30.6%), poor academic results (19.8%), or a combination of the above factors. Motivations to study medicine include family influences (more so in normal-age entrants), altruistic reasons (more so in mature-age entrants) and a variety of personal/social factors such as intellectual satisfaction, prestige and financial security (similar for both groups) and parental expectations (more so in normal-age entrants). Mature-age entrants experienced greater stress throughout the medical course, especially with regard to financial difficulties, loneliness/isolation from the students and family problems (a greater proportion were married with children). While whole-course grades were similar in both groups, normal-age entrants tended to win more undergraduate honours/prizes and postgraduate diplomas/degrees, including specialist qualifications. Practice settings were similar in terms of group private practice, hospital/clinic practice or medical administration, but there was a greater proportion of mature-age entrants in solo private practice, and a smaller proportion in teaching/research. If given the time over, some two-thirds of both groups would choose medicine as a career. Reasons for job satisfaction include helping patients, intellectual stimulation and financial rewards. Reasons for dissatisfaction include pressure of work, red-tape/paperwork, 'doctor-bashing', long working hours, emotional strain, financial pressure, unfulfilled career expectations and irritation with trivial medical complaints.


Subject(s)
Career Choice , Job Satisfaction , Students, Medical , Achievement , Adult , Age Factors , Educational Measurement , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Male , Motivation , Professional Practice , Queensland , Socioeconomic Factors
9.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 9(8): 547-51, 1990 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2146585

ABSTRACT

Serum immunoglobulins and IgG subclasses were measured in 26 children with Down's syndrome using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and monoclonal antibodies. Eighteen (69%) of the children had increased susceptibility to infection. None of the children had deficiencies of total IgG and IgM, and only one had an IgA deficiency. IgG4 deficiency was diagnosed in 14 (54%) children. One child had a deficiency of IgG2. There were no children with deficiencies of either IgG1 or IgG3. There was a significant correlation between IgG subclass deficiency and predisposition to infection (P less than 0.05). Ninety percent of the patients with severe infections had low IgG4 whereas only 25% of those with no infections had low concentrations of IgG4. These results suggest that it is important to screen patients with Down's syndrome who have frequent systemic or respiratory infections for IgG subclass deficiencies because this may not be apparent from the assay of total IgG.


Subject(s)
Down Syndrome/immunology , IgG Deficiency , Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes/complications , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Down Syndrome/complications , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Respiratory Tract Infections/immunology
10.
Med Educ ; 24(4): 344-53, 1990 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2395426

ABSTRACT

One hundred and eighty-four medical students at the University of Queensland were surveyed after they returned from their clinical elective. Approximately half stayed in Australia, and the other half travelled overseas. The United Kingdom was the most popular overseas destination, but there was a wide geographic distribution. The most popular clinical specialties were surgery, medicine, orthopaedics and emergency medicine, while the least popular were geriatrics and psychiatry. They were given a reasonable work schedule, but students remaining in Australia had a heavier work-load. While students on overseas electives received more formal instruction, students remaining in Australian placements received greater responsibility and better acceptance, but the majority in both groups received adequate supervision. Students gained experience in a large number of practical procedures, especially those in Australian placements. More problems were encountered by students in overseas placements, particularly with regard to organizing the elective, finances and personal-social difficulties. The vast majority of students found their clinical elective to be moderately or extremely worthwhile, and cited a number of perceived benefits. These results suggest that the clinical elective can have significant educational value.


Subject(s)
Clinical Clerkship , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Medicine , Specialization , Attitude of Health Personnel , Australia , Choice Behavior , Humans , Students, Medical/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires
11.
BMJ ; 300(6736): 1372-5, 1990 May 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2372582

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the sociodemographic and motivational characteristics of parents who volunteer their children for clinical research. DESIGN: A questionnaire was administered to parents who volunteered their children for a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial of a drug to treat asthma and to a control group of parents whose children were eligible for the trial but had refused the invitation. SETTING: A children's hospital in Australia. SUBJECTS: 68 Parents who had volunteered their children and 42 who had not; a response rate of 94% and 70%, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Responses of parents to questionnaire designed to assess their perceptions, attitudes, and health seeking behaviour as well as sociodemographic data. RESULTS: Volunteering parents were less well educated with only 15% (10/68) of mothers and 16% (11/68) and of fathers having had a tertiary or university education compared with 26% (11/42) of mothers and 45% (19/42) in the non-volunteering group. Fewer volunteering parents had professional or administrative jobs than did non-volunteering parents (mothers 6% (4/68); fathers 9% (6/68) v mothers 14% (6/42); fathers 31% (13/42)). Volunteering parents had less social support, and they displayed greater health seeking behaviour and consumed more habit forming substances. They were motivated by a desire to help others and to contribute to medical research, but they were also searching for more information and better ways to help their own children. CONCLUSION: Parents who volunteer their children for medical research are significantly more socially disadvantaged and emotionally vulnerable.


Subject(s)
Motivation , Parents , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Adult , Asthma/drug therapy , Attitude to Health , Child, Preschool , Decision Making , Double-Blind Method , Emotions , Female , Humans , Infant , Ketotifen/therapeutic use , Male , Parental Consent , Parents/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Persons , Queensland , Social Support , Socioeconomic Factors , Therapeutic Human Experimentation , Vulnerable Populations
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...