Investigation of the first reported outbreak of New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase-1-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Texas.

We describe an epidemiologic investigation and successful control measures for the first reported outbreak of blaNDM-1-carrying Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Texas occurring in a veteran with transmission of the same organism and a blaNDM-5-carrying Escherichia coli, respectively, to two roommates and blaNDM-carrying organism/s to a patient cared for by common staff.

Effect of serious infectious threat response initiative (SITRI) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic at the Veterans Affairs North Texas Health Care System.

BACKGROUND: Health care-associated infections (HAIs) increased worldwide as health care facilities struggled through the pandemic. We describe our methods in the implementation of a programmatic initiative called serious infectious threat response initiative (SITRI) that was conceptualized to support our staff, to facilitate day-to-day clinical operations related to COVID-19 and to shield our infection prevention and control program (IPC) from excessive COVID-19 work burden to the extent possible to retain routine prevention focused efforts. Post implementation, we sought to understand and quantify the workload and utility of SITRI, IPC burnout and HAI incidence during the implementation period. METHODS: We correlated the number of weekly phone calls with inpatient COVID-19 census, assessed types of calls, staff feedback, IPC burnout, pre- and postpandemic HAI incidence, and the cost. RESULTS: There was significant correlation between SITRI calls and the weekly average COVID-19 census (P = .00026). IPC burnout evaluation indicated improvement in scores for exhaustion and reduced achievement and worsening in score for depersonalization. HAI incidence did not increase. SITRI's cost was $360,000. CONCLUSIONS: Staff solicited SITRI's support in tandem with the COVID-19 burden. Our HAI during the pandemic did not increase while SITRI was operational in contrast to what is published in literature.

Feasibility of subcutaneous gentamicin and pressurized irrigation as adjuvant strategies to reduce surgical site infection in colorectal surgery: results of a pilot study.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) remain a common and costly morbidity after colorectal surgery. This rate remains high even in the setting of strict adherence to Surgical Care Improvement Project Protocols. The aim of our pilot study was to determine the feasibility and safety of subcutaneous gentamicin injection or pressurized irrigation as adjuncts to reduce SSI. A total of 132 patients who underwent colorectal surgery at the VA North Texas Health Care System were prospectively assigned to a pressurized irrigation group (n = 44), a preincision gentamicin injection group (n = 48), or control (n = 40). The primary objective was to assess safety and feasibility of these strategies. Patient demographics were matched among groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify possible predictions of SSI in this cohort. The rate of SSI in the control group was 25 per cent, 13.5 per cent in the pressurized irrigation group, and 12.5 per cent in the gentamicin group (P = 0.26). Combined, the intervention groups had a 13 per cent SSI versus 25 per cent control (P = 0.09). Operative time was not increased by the interventions and no intraoperative complications specifically related to the interventions were noted. Postoperative complications were not different between groups. Both albumin and body mass index were associated with SSI. Body mass index was and independent predictor of SSI (P = 0.006). In conclusion, this pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of the interventions described. There was no detrimental effect of either intervention. There was trend toward a reduction in SSI in the intervention group, which warrants further investigation.

Evaluating an evidence-based bundle for preventing surgical site infection: a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if an evidence-based practice bundle would result in a significantly lower rate of surgical site infections (SSIs) when compared with standard practice. DESIGN: Single-institution, randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment of main outcome. The trial opened in April 2007 and was closed in January 2010. SETTING: Veterans Administration teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Patients who required elective transabdominal colorectal surgery were eligible. A total of 241 subjects were approached, 211 subjects were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 interventions, and 197 were included in an intention-to-treat analysis. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects received either a combination of 5 evidenced-based practices (extended arm) or were treated according to our current practice (standard arm). The interventions in the extended arm included (1) omission of mechanical bowel preparation; (2) preoperative and intraoperative warming; (3) supplemental oxygen during and immediately after surgery; (4) intraoperative intravenous fluid restriction; and (5) use of a surgical wound protector. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Overall SSI rate at 30 days assessed by blinded infection control coordinators using standardized definitions. RESULTS: The overall rate of SSI was 45% in the extended arm of the study and 24% in the standard arm (P = .003). Most of the increased number of infections in the extended arm were superficial incisional SSIs (36% extended arm vs 19% standard arm; P = .004). Multivariate analysis suggested that allocation to the extended arm of the trial conferred a 2.49-fold risk (95% confidence interval, 1.36-4.56; P = .003) independent of other factors traditionally associated with SSI. CONCLUSIONS: An evidence-based intervention bundle did not reduce SSIs. The bundling of interventions, even when the constituent interventions have been individually tested, does not have a predictable effect on outcome. Formal testing of bundled approaches should occur prior to implementation.

Surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: do risk factors vary depending on the type of infection considered?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare risk factors for the development of incisional versus organ/space infections in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved retrospective review was performed examining a 4-year period (January 2002 to December 2005). Patients were included if they had undergone abdominal operations (open or laparoscopic) in which the colon/rectum was surgically manipulated. Patients were excluded if the surgical wound was not closed primarily. A standardized definition of incisional and organ/space infection was employed. RESULTS: A total of 428 operations were performed. Overall, 105 infections were identified (25%); 73 involved the incision and 32 were classified as organ/space. Multivariate analysis suggested that incisional infection was independently associated with body mass index (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.11) and creation/revision/reversal of an ostomy (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3-3.9). Organ/space infection was independently associated with perioperative transfusion (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1-5.5) and with previous abdominal surgery (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2-5.3). CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with infection differed based on the type of surgical site infection being considered. The lack of overlap between factors associated with incisional infection and organ/space infection suggests that separate risk models and treatment strategies should be developed.