ABSTRACT
Background: The Australian immunisation schedule uses 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13), while New Zealand (NZ) changed from PCV13 to 10-valent PCV (PCV10) in 2017. In NZ, cases of serotype 19A (not in PCV10) have been increasing since 2017. We compared invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) epidemiology between Australia and NZ in 2017-2021. Methods: We collated IPD notification data from national surveillance systems. Between Australia and NZ, we compared IPD incidence rates and assessed the proportion of serotype 19A, and stratified for ethnicity and age. Findings: Between 2017 and 2021, the crude IPD incidence per 100,000 in Australia ranged from 4.3 to 8.4, and ranged from 6.9 to 11.4 in NZ. The highest age-adjusted IPD rates were observed in Australian Indigenous people (range: 27.3-35.5) followed by NZ Maori/Pacific peoples (range 19.7-30.4). For children <2 years, ethnicity-adjusted IPD rates were similar between Australia and NZ in 2017-2020. In 2021, however, the ethnicity-adjusted incidence in children <2 years was higher in NZ (30.2; 95% CI 21.1-39.4) than in Australia (23.3 95% CI: 19.5-27.1) (p < 0.01). In Australia, the proportion of serotype 19A remained 5%, whereas in NZ serotype 19A increased from 11.5% to 29.5% with the largest increase in children <2 years and 2-4 years. Interpretation: Despite higher risks in Indigenous populations in Australia compared to all other groups, the overall IPD rate in NZ is increasing, particularly among children. The numbers and proportions of IPD due to serotype 19A are increasing in NZ especially in children. These data support the NZ decision from December 2022 to change to PCV13. Funding: This research received no specific funding.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Adults living in the sunny Australian climate are at high risk of skin cancer, but vitamin D deficiency (defined here as a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration of less than 50 nmol/L) is also common. Vitamin D deficiency may be a risk factor for a range of diseases. However, the optimal strategies to achieve and maintain vitamin D adequacy (sun exposure, vitamin D supplementation or both), and whether sun exposure itself has benefits over and above initiating synthesis of vitamin D, remain unclear. The Sun Exposure and Vitamin D Supplementation (SEDS) Study aims to compare the effectiveness of sun exposure and vitamin D supplementation for the management of vitamin D insufficiency, and to test whether these management strategies differentially affect markers of immune and cardio-metabolic function. METHODS/DESIGN: The SEDS Study is a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of two different daily doses of vitamin D supplementation, and placebo, in conjunction with guidance on two different patterns of sun exposure. Participants recruited from across Australia are aged 18-64 years and have a recent vitamin D test result showing a serum 25(OH)D level of 40-60 nmol/L. DISCUSSION: This paper discusses the rationale behind the study design, and considers the challenges but necessity of data collection within a non-institutionalised adult population, in order to address the study aims. We also discuss the challenges of participant recruitment and retention, ongoing engagement of referring medical practitioners and address issues of compliance and participant retention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12613000290796 Registered 14 March 2013.
