Treatment of Delbet II/III Pediatric Femoral Neck Fractures With Proximal Femoral Locking Plate Versus Cannulated Screws.

INTRODUCTION: Complications following operative treatment of pediatric femoral neck fractures include nonunion, coxa vara, and avascular necrosis (AVN). Proximal femoral locking plates (PFLPs) provide a fixed-angle construct that may reduce the rates of coxa vara, but their use in pediatric femoral neck fractures has not been studied. The purpose of this study was to evaluate rates of union, coxa vara, and AVN in traumatic pediatric femoral neck fractures treated with PFLP or cannulated screws (CS). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all traumatic, nonpathologic Delbet II/III femoral neck fractures in patients below 18 years of age treated with PFLP or CS. All cases had ≥6 months of radiographic follow-up to evaluate for osseous union and AVN. Changes in proximal femoral alignment were determined by measuring injured and contralateral femoral neck-shaft angle and articulotrochanteric distance (ATD) between 6 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were identified with mean age at surgery of 10.7±2.9 years (range 3.3 to 16.3 years) and mean follow-up of 36±27 months. Sixteen patients (38%) underwent PFLP fixation, whereas 26 patients (62%) underwent CS fixation. When compared with the CS cohort, the PFLP cohort had a greater proportion of males (87.5% vs. 50%, P =0.02) and Delbet III fractures (68.8% vs. 15.4%, P <0.001). There was no difference between PFLP and CS cohorts with respect to rates of union (81% vs. 88%, respectively, P =0.66), AVN (25% vs. 35%, respectively, P =0.73), or secondary surgery (62% vs 62%, P =0.95). There was no significant difference in neck-shaft angle between injured and contralateral hips in those patients treated with PFLP ( P =0.93) or CS ( P =0.16). However, the ATD was significantly decreased in hips treated with CS compared with the contralateral hip (18.4±4.6 vs. 23.3±4.2 mm, P =0.001), with no significant difference in the PFLP group ( P =0.57). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the use of a PFLP in Delbet II/III femoral neck fractures does not appear to significantly increase nonunion rates or AVN and maintains anatomic ATD when compared with screw fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-therapeutic study.

Outcomes and Cost of Reduction of Overriding Pediatric Distal Radius Fractures.

BACKGROUND: This study compared radiographic outcomes of pediatric patients undergoing closed reduction of 100% displaced distal radius fractures to a historical, published cohort treated with casting alone. We also examined the expense associated with sedated reduction. METHODS: Single-center, retrospective cohort study examining radiographic outcomes following reduction of 100% translated distal radius fractures in 50 consecutive pediatric patients. Radiographic outcomes were compared with a historical cohort published by Crawford and colleagues. Charges associated with emergency department (ED) and clinic visits were compared between the reduction cohort and a comparison cohort of 13 patients with fractures not requiring reduction. RESULTS: Forty-nine children (mean age 4.7 y) were included in this study. Duration of casting averaged 51 days and ED visit duration was 6.6±2.5 hours. Mean sagittal and coronal angulation at time of injury were 16.4 and 15.6 degrees, respectively, and were 13.2 and 9.4 degrees at the time of final follow-up. All fractures achieved radiographic union. Eighteen patients underwent a total of 21 unexpected cast changes. No patients required repeat sedation or surgical management.Angulation after casting was significantly better in the reduction cohort compared with the casting-only cohort initially, however, at final follow-up, both coronal and sagittal angulation were significantly worse in the reduction cohort compared with the casting-only cohort (coronal angulation 8.59 vs. 0.75, P<0.0001; sagittal angulation 13.49 vs. 2.2, P<0.0001).Charge analysis compared 46 patients in the reduction cohort to 13 patients with unreduced fractures from the same institution during the same time period. Mean clinic charges were similar ($1957 vs. $2240, P=0.3008). ED charges were higher in the reduction cohort compared with the nonreduction cohort ($7331 vs. $3501, P<0.001), resulting in higher total charges in the reduction cohort ($9245.04 vs. $5740.99, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: While closed reduction of 100% translated distal radius fractures in the pediatric population improves angulation initially, casting alone may provide similar or better radiographic outcomes, expedited care, reduced patient exposure to the risks of procedural sedation, and avoidance of ED charges associated with procedural sedation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-therapeutic.

Investigating Instructor Talk in Novel Contexts: Widespread Use, Unexpected Categories, and an Emergent Sampling Strategy.

Instructor Talk-noncontent language used by instructors in classrooms-is a recently defined and promising variable for better understanding classroom dynamics. Having previously characterized the Instructor Talk framework within the context of a single course, we present here our results surrounding the applicability of the Instructor Talk framework to noncontent language used by instructors in novel course contexts. We analyzed Instructor Talk in eight additional biology courses in their entirety and in 61 biology courses using an emergent sampling strategy. We observed widespread use of Instructor Talk with variation in the amount and category type used. The vast majority of Instructor Talk could be characterized using the originally published Instructor Talk framework, suggesting the robustness of this framework. Additionally, a new form of Instructor Talk-Negatively Phrased Instructor Talk, language that may discourage students or distract from the learning process-was detected in these novel course contexts. Finally, the emergent sampling strategy described here may allow investigation of Instructor Talk in even larger numbers of courses across institutions and disciplines. Given its widespread use, potential influence on students in learning environments, and ability to be sampled, Instructor Talk may be a key variable to consider in future research on teaching and learning in higher education.