Humanized porcine VCAM-specific monoclonal antibodies with chimeric IgG2/G4 constant regions block human leukocyte binding to porcine endothelial cells.

Discordant xenografts surviving the initial hyperacute rejection phase may be subject to cellular rejection processes mediated by infiltrating leukocytes including T cells, NK cells and monocytes. The stable adhesion of these cell types to endothelial cells is due to the molecular interaction of the integrins VLA-4 and LFA-1 with their ligands vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM) and ICAM-1 present on the endothelial cells. Human VLA-4 binds to porcine VCAM, and blocking mAbs specific for porcine VCAM have been developed. We have localized the epitope of the anti-porcine VCAM blocking mAbs 2A2 and 3F4 to domains 1 and 2, respectively. Humanized antibodies (IgG4 isotype) were constructed from these anti-porcine VCAM antibodies and demonstrated to inhibit adhesion of Ramos, Jurkat and YT cells, as well as purified resting and activated human T cells, to porcine aortic endothelial cells (PAEC). These cell types express both LFA-1 as well as VLA-4, suggesting blockade of human VLA-4 interaction with porcine VCAM may alone be sufficient to significantly impair adhesion of human leukocytes to porcine endothelial cells. The chimeric anti-porcine VCAM (pVCAM) HuG4 antibodies promoted increased adhesion of Fc receptor (FcR) positive cells such as U937 monocytic cells to PAEC. In contrast, chimeric anti-porcine VCAM antibodies created using the CH1 and hinge region from human IgG2 and the CH2 and CH3 regions from human IgG4 (HuG2/G4 antibodies) inhibited binding of FcR positive cells to PAEC. These chimeric anti-pVCAM antibodies should allow delineation of the in vivo role of VLA-4/VCAM interaction in porcine-to-primate xenotransplants. Further, the design of the HuG2/G4 antibodies should render them efficacious in multiple settings requiring elimination of FcR binding.

Inhibition of complement activity by humanized anti-C5 antibody and single-chain Fv.

Activation of the complement system contributes significantly to the pathogenesis of numerous acute and chronic diseases. Recently, a monoclonal antibody (5G1.1) that recognizes the human complement protein C5, has been shown to effectively block C5 cleavage, thereby preventing the generation of the pro-inflammatory complement components C5a and C5b-9. Humanized 5G1.1 antibody, Fab and scFv molecules have been produced by grafting the complementarity determining regions of 5G1.1 on to human framework regions. Competitive ELISA analysis indicated that no framework changes were required in the humanized variable regions for retention of high affinity binding to C5, even at framework positions predicted by computer modeling to influence CDR canonical structure. The humanized Fab and scFv molecules blocked complement-mediated lysis of chicken erythrocytes and porcine aortic endothelial cells in a dose-dependent fashion, with complete complement inhibition occurring at a three-fold molar excess, relative to the human C5 concentration. In contrast to a previously characterized anti-C5 scFv molecule, the humanized h5G1.1 scFv also effectively blocked C5a generation. Finally, an intact humanized h5G1.1 antibody blocked human complement lytic activity at concentrations identical to the original murine monoclonal antibody. These results demonstrate that humanized h5G1.1 and its recombinant derivatives retain both the affinity and blocking functions of the murine 5G1.1 antibody, and suggest that these molecules may serve as potent inhibitors of complement-mediated pathology in human inflammatory diseases.

Rapid expression of an anti-human C5 chimeric Fab utilizing a vector that replicates in COS and 293 cells.

Inhibition of complement system activation requires the development of soluble nonimmunogenic inhibitors with good tissue penetrating abilities that are themselves unable to activate complement. Chimeric mouse/human Fabs capable of blocking the activity of complement proteins are likely to fulfill these criteria. Several monoclonal antibodies that inhibit the activation of the human complement system have recently been developed. To examine the properties of chimeric Fab derived from these monoclonal antibodies, we have developed an expression system which allows the rapid production of milligram quantities of chimeric Fab. Both the chimeric light chain and the chimeric Fd were co-expressed from the same vector, pAPEX-3P. This vector contains the SV40 origin of replication, which allows the rapid production of chimeric Fab in COS cells for preliminary characterization. Additionally, pAPEX-3P contains the Epstein-Barr virus origin of replication and a puromycin selectable marker for maintenance as a stable episome in human cell lines. A production system consisting of transfected 293-EBNA cells cultured in serum free medium followed by protein G-Sepharose chromatography of the conditioned medium was found to be sufficient for the rapid production of purified chimeric Fab. Here we have utilized this expression system to demonstrate that an anti-human C5 chimeric Fab was a potent inhibitor of complement activation in both in vitro activation assays and an ex vivo model of complement-mediated tissue damage.

What we say and what we do: self-reported teaching behavior versus performances in written simulations among medical school faculty.

Much of the research in medical education is performed through the use of self-reporting questionnaires. Although this can be a valid way to conduct research, little effort has been made to examine the fit between what teachers self-report and what they actually do. In an attempt to investigate this, the authors interviewed 47 preclinical faculty members at two large medical schools in 1990. The faculty members were initially given a questionnaire asking them to self-report in four categories: interactive skills; knowledge or abilities they considered important for students to develop; factors that influenced their curriculum development; and sources from which they sought pedagogical assistance. This was followed by four written simulations that examined four areas of teaching: small-group discussions, course design, lecturing, and test construction. In addition, the authors specifically sought to identify any differences in teaching philosophy and practice between those preclinical faculty who were physicians and those who were not, as well as any interinstitutional differences. Although in certain instances there was a strong correlation between self-reporting and performance as measured by a simulated teaching scenario, in most instances the correlation was quite low. Consequently, the authors suggest that researchers must be careful in their use of self-reporting as a means of assessing teaching behavior, and that whenever possible, researchers should observe the teachers they are studying.