Utility of Recovery Room vs Post-Operative Day 1 Radiographs Following Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Background: Postoperative radiographs may be performed on different timelines after shoulder arthroplasty. Radiographs obtained in the post-operative recovery unit (PACU) are often of poorer quality. The purpose of the current study was to explore and compare the quality of PACU radiographs and radiographs performed in the radiology suite on post-operative Day 1 (POD1), as well as determine their impact on changes in post-operative management. Methods: Our series included 50 consecutive anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties (TSA) for which post-operative radiographs were obtained in the PACU and 50 consecutive TSA for which post-operative radiographs were obtained in the radiology suite on POD 1. TSA radiographs were blinded and reviewed by 3 authors and graded on their quality using criteria described using previously published methods. The weighted kappa was used to describe the intra-rater agreement and inter-rater agreement between two raters. Results: There was no difference in age, sex, BMI, and comorbidities between cohorts. Intra-observer reliability was moderate to substantial with weighted kappa values of 0.65±0.07 (p<0.001), 0.58±0.09 (p<0.001), and 0.67±0.07 (p<0.001). Inter-observer reliability was moderate to substantial with weighted kappa values of 0.605±0.07 (p<0.001), 0.66±0.07 (p<0.001), and 0.65±0.08 (p<0.001). When assessing quality of radiographs, 30% of radiographs obtained in PACU were deemed quality while 57% of radiographs obtained in the radiology suite were deemed quality (p<0.001). Conclusion: Post-operative radiographs in the PACU do not alter patient management and are often inadequate to serve as baseline radiographs. Conversely, radiographs obtained in the radiology suite are of higher quality and can serve as a superior baseline radiograph. Level of Evidence: IV.

Utility of Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in revision arthroplasty presents as a challenging complication that is difficult to manage. Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is a recognized treatment option, although few studies have investigated success rates in addition to eventual amputation rates for failed cases. Methods: A retrospective review of 365 DAIR cases was performed at a single institution from 2008-2020. Patient records were thoroughly reviewed for inclusion and exclusion criteria by multiple members of the research team, discovering 45 cases met criteria for the study cohort. Demographic information, medical history, culture data, and surgical history, were recorded. DAIR's overall survivorship was evaluated with a Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curve. Additional KM curves were constructed to compare acute postoperative versus acute hematogenous infections as well as DAIR survivorship relative to infecting organism. Results: DAIR's success rate in revision TKA was 77% at 0.5 years, 56% at 2 years and 46% at 5 years. No significant difference was noted in survivorship when comparing acute postoperative and acute hematogenous cases at 5 years (29 vs 51%, P=0.64). No significance differences in survivorship were noted according to infecting organism (P =0.30). Median follow up duration was significantly lower in the failed DAIR cohort with a median time of 0.5 years in comparison to 1.7 years for the successful DAIR group (P =0.012). There were 20 DAIR cases that failed, 10 of which resulted in eventual amputation. Conclusion: DAIR's success rate for managing acute PJI in revision arthroplasty cases was 46% at 5 years. Of the 20 failed DAIR cases, 10 resulted in eventual amputation. DAIRs utility in managing these complicated PJI cases in the setting of revision arthroplasty is concerning with low success rates and high rates of amputation in failed cases. Level of Evidence: III.

Rate of incidental findings on routine preoperative computed tomography for shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Incidental findings are commonly noted in advanced imaging studies. Few data exist regarding the rate of incidental findings on computed tomography (CT) for preoperative shoulder arthroplasty planning. This study aims to identify the incidence of these findings and the rate at which they warrant further work-up to help guide orthopedic surgeons in counseling patients. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to identify patients with available preoperative shoulder CT who subsequently underwent shoulder arthroplasty procedures at a single institution between 2015 and 2021. Data including age, sex, and smoking status were obtained. Radiology reports for CTs were reviewed for incidental findings and categorized based on location, tissue type, and/or body system. The rate of incidental findings and the rate at which further follow-up was recommended by the radiologist were determined. RESULTS: A total of 617 patients was identified. There were 173 incidental findings noted in 146 of these patients (23.7%). Findings ranged from pulmonary (59%), skin/soft tissue (16%), thyroid (13%), vascular (9%), spinal (2%), and abdominal (1%) areas. Of the pulmonary findings, 50% were pulmonary nodules and 47% were granulomatous disease. Overall, the final radiology report recommended further follow-up for 50% of the patients with incidental findings. CONCLUSIONS: Incidental findings are relatively common in preoperative CTs obtained for shoulder arthroplasty, occurring in nearly one-quarter of patients. Most of these findings are pulmonary in nature. Overall, half of the patients with incidental findings were recommended for further follow-up. These results establish population data to guide orthopedic surgeons in patient counseling. Level of evidence: III.

Outcomes, Complications, and Reoperations After Meniscal Allograft Transplantation.

Background: Outcomes following meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) are an evolving topic. Purpose: To review clinical outcomes in younger, previously active patients who underwent an isolated MAT or MAT plus any osteotomy. Concurrent surgeries, complications, and graft survivorship are presented. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Inclusion criteria included having undergone MAT with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up with at least 1 of the following patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures collected pre- and postoperatively: visual analog scale for pain, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and overall satisfaction. From patient records, we recorded descriptive data, side (medial/lateral), previous or concurrent procedures, perioperative complications, revisions, and conversion to arthroplasty. Two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test for differences in age and body mass index (BMI). A 2 × 2 chi-square test was used to determine if the spectrum of procedures performed on our study's patient group was representative of the entire population. PRO results were analyzed using a multivariate ANOVA. Results: From a total of 91 eligible patients, 61 (63 knees) met our inclusion criteria. Mean presurgery age was 25.5 ± 9.2 years, and mean BMI was 26.7 (range, 18.5-38.4). At follow-up (mean, 4.8 years; range, 1.0-13.6 years) overall PROs were statistically and clinically improved at final follow-up (P ≤ .003); effect sizes were moderate and large. KOOS Pain and KOOS Activities of Daily Living showed some main or interaction effects that were trivial or small. Patient satisfaction with the treatment was ≥7 out of 10 in 85% of patients. A minimum of 1 subsequent surgery for various concerns was necessary in 23% of the 93 knees. Graft survival in the included patients was 100%. Conclusion: Complications (conditions requiring at least 1 subsequent surgery) affected about one-quarter of the patients who underwent MAT. Nevertheless, MAT seemed to provide our patients with adequate pain relief and improved function.