Comparison of IgE-binding capacity, cross-reactivity and biological potency of allergenic non-specific lipid transfer proteins from peach, cherry and hazelnut.

BACKGROUND: Whether the observed clinical pattern of non-specific lipid transfer protein (nsLTP)-mediated food allergies is attributable to a primary sensitization by Pru p 3 from peach and subsequent cross-reactivity with Rosaceae- and non-Rosaceae-derived foods expressing homologous allergens is still unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the allergenic properties of nsLTPs from Rosaceae and non-Rosaceae foods. METHODS: In peach-, cherry- or hazelnut-allergic patients, prevalence of sensitization, IgE-binding capacity, cross-reactivity and allergenic potency of Pru p 3 was compared with Pru av 3 (cherry) and Cor a 8 (hazelnut). RESULTS: Frequency of sensitization to corresponding nsLTPs was 88, 85, and 77% in peach-, hazelnut- and cherry-allergic patients, respectively. Concomitant allergic reactions to cherry and hazelnut were reported in 51 and 44% of peach-allergic patients, respectively. In contrast to cherry allergy, hazelnut allergy was not strictly associated to peach allergy. Sensitization to Cor a 8 or Pru av 3 was strongly correlated with IgE reactivity to Pru p 3, even when subjects tolerated peach. Specific IgE was highest for Rosaceae LTPs, and cross-inhibition experiments confirmed a stronger IgE-binding capacity of Pru p 3 than Cor a 8. The biological potency of Pru p 3 and Pru av 3 was similar but stronger for both nsLTPs than that of Cor a 8. CONCLUSION: Clinical cross-reactivity of food-allergic patients in the Mediterranean area is likely attributed to a primary sensitization to Pru p 3 and serological cross-reactivity with homologous food nsLTPs. In comparison to Cor a 8, Rosaceae nsLTPs showed a stronger IgE-binding capacity and allergenic potency indicating a different epitope pattern.

Characterization of the allergic T-cell response to Pru p 3, the nonspecific lipid transfer protein in peach.

BACKGROUND: Pru p 3, the nonspecific lipid transfer protein from peach, is an important plant food allergen that frequently induces systemic reactions. OBJECTIVE: We sought to analyze the allergic T-cell response to Pru p 3. METHODS: PBMCs from Italian and Spanish patients with peach allergy were stimulated with purified natural Pru p 3. Allergen-specific T-cell lines were used to identify T-cell epitopes of Pru p 3. Pru p 3-specific T-cell clones (TCCs) were analyzed for allergen-induced secretion of IL-4, IFN-gamma, and IL-10 and expression of the integrin beta7, a receptor critical for gut homing. RESULTS: No difference in T-cell responses of Italian and Spanish patients was found. Among several T cell-activating regions, Pru p 3(13-27), Pru p 3(34-48), Pru p 3(43-57), and Pru p 3(61-75) were most frequently recognized in 18 Pru p 3-specific T-cell lines. The majority of 32 Pru p 3-specific TCCs belonged to the T(H)2 subset. In contrast to TCCs specific for other plant food and pollen allergens, only a limited number of Pru p 3-specific TCCs produced significant amounts of IL-10. The expression of integrin beta7 on Pru p 3-specific TCCs was comparable with that observed on peanut-specific TCCs and higher compared with that seen in different pollen-specific TCCs. CONCLUSION: The T-cell response to Pru p 3 is dominated by T(H)2 cells presumably primed in the gut. The identification of relevant T cell-activating regions provides a basis for engineering hypoallergenic variants of Pru p 3 with less IgE binding and retained T-cell stimulatory capacity for safe immunotherapy of peach allergy.

Molecular characterisation of Lac s 1, the major allergen from lettuce (Lactuca sativa).

BACKGROUND: IgE sensitisation to non-specific lipid transfer proteins (nsLTP), e.g., Pru p 3 the major allergen from peach and most important allergenic LTP, is strongly associated with severe symptoms in food allergic patients. Lac s 1, a member of the nsLTP protein family, was recently identified as major allergen in lettuce (Lactuca sativa), but has not yet been investigated on the molecular basis. OBJECTIVE: Molecular characterisation and immunological comparison of Lac s 1 to peach allergen Pru p 3. METHODS: Lac s 1 cDNA was cloned by RT-PCR and natural (n) Lac s 1 was purified by a two-step chromatography. Protein structure was verified by N-terminal sequencing, mass spectrometry, and circular dichroism spectroscopy. Immunoblotting, ImmunoCAP, and competitive IgE binding experiments were performed to study the IgE sensitisation pattern and cross-reactivity with Pru p 3. Allergenic potency was analysed by histamine release assay. RESULTS: Twenty-nine lettuce allergic patients, with or without concomitant peach allergy, and 19 peach allergic patients without lettuce allergy were included in this study. IgE reactivity to lettuce was due to mono-sensitisation to Lac s 1 or cross-reactive glycan structures. Two Lac s 1 isoforms were identified which showed amino acid identity (aa-id) of 62% to each other, up to 66% to Pru p 3, and 72% to the N-terminal peptide of plane pollen LTP Pla a 3. The prevalence of IgE binding to nLac s 1 was 90% using lettuce extract in immunoblotting experiments. Enhanced sensitivity was observed in ImmunoCAP using purified nLac s 1 in comparison to extracts (93% versus 76%). Although IgE sensitisation to Lac s 1 and Pru p 3 was strongly associated, the two LTPs showed different IgE binding properties. Sensitisation to LTPs does not necessarily reflect the clinical disease, but Lac s 1 was capable of triggering histamine release as shown by positive skin test results in Lac s 1 mono-sensitised patients and by in vitro mediator release assays. CONCLUSION: Purified nLac s 1 will enhance the sensitivity in component resolved diagnosis of lettuce allergy. Similar to other cross-reactive food allergies, exclusive testing of IgE reactivities to LTP cannot be used as biomarker for clinical relevance. Our data provide indirect evidence that Pru p 3 might act as the primary sensitising agent in patients allergic to both lettuce and peach.

Strong allergenicity of Pru av 3, the lipid transfer protein from cherry, is related to high stability against thermal processing and digestion.

BACKGROUND: Nonspecific lipid transfer proteins (nsLTPs) have been identified as major fruit allergens in patients from the Mediterranean area. Sensitization to nsLTPs is accompanied by severe reactions, possibly because of specific biophysical and biochemical properties of this allergen family. OBJECTIVE: To assess the protein stability and allergenic potency of nsLTP from fruits in comparison with birch pollen-related allergens from the same allergenic source. METHODS: Stability of natural and recombinant cherry allergens Pru av 3 (nsLTP), Pru av 1 (Bet v 1 homologue), and Pru av 4 (profilin) to pepsin digestion and to thermal processing and stability of allergens in skin prick test reagents was investigated by immunoblotting and/or circular dichroism spectroscopy. Moreover, allergenicity of processed and fresh fruits in regard to Pru av 1 and Pru av 3 was analyzed by histamine release assays. RESULTS: Lipid transfer proteins showed the highest resistance to digestion by pepsin (rPru av 3 > rPru av 1 > rPru av 4). Immunologically active Pru av 3 was detectable after 2 hours of digestion by pepsin, whereas IgE reactivity of Pru av 1 and Pru av 4 was abolished within less than 60 minutes. In contrast with Pru av 1, IgE reactivity to nsLTPs was not diminished in thermally processed fruits, and secondary structures of purified Pru av 3 were more resistant to heating. Moreover, nsLTPs were stable components in skin prick test reagents. Histamine release assays confirmed the strong allergenicity of nsLTPs, which was not affected by protease treatment or thermal processing of fruits. CONCLUSION: In contrast with birch pollen-related allergens, nsLTPs are highly stable to pepsin treatment and thermal processing and show higher allergenic potency. Therefore, nsLTPs have the potential to act as true food allergens, probably eliciting severe systemic reactions by reaching the intestinal mucosa in an intact and fully active form.