Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Crit Care ; 62: 76-81, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33290929

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sustained low efficiency dialysis (SLED) has emerged as an alternative to continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for the treatment of acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients. However, there is limited information on the short- and long-term outcomes of SLED compared to CRRT. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with AKI who commenced either SLED or CRRT in ICUs at a tertiary care hospital in Toronto, Canada. The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included mortality at one year, and dialysis dependence at 90 days and one year. All outcomes were ascertained by linkage to provincial datasets. RESULTS: We identified 284 patients, of whom 95 and 189 commenced SLED and CRRT, respectively. Compared to SLED recipients, more CRRT recipients were mechanically ventilated (96% vs 86%, p = 0.002) and receiving vasopressors (94% vs 84%, p = 0.01) at the time of RRT initiation. At 90 days following RRT initiation, 52 (55%) and 126 (67%) SLED and CRRT recipients, respectively, died (adjusted risk ratio (RR) 0.91, 95% CI 0.75-1.11). There was no inter-modality difference in time to death through 90 days (adjusted hazard ratio 0.90, 95% CI 0.64-1.27). Among patients surviving to Day 90, a higher proportion of SLED recipients remained RRT dependent (10 (23%) vs 6 (10%) CRRT recipients, adjusted RR 2.82, 95% CI 1.02-7.81). At one year, there was no difference in mortality or dialysis dependence. CONCLUSIONS: Among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury, mortality at 90 days and one year was not different among patients initiating SLED as compared to CRRT.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy , Hybrid Renal Replacement Therapy , Acute Kidney Injury/therapy , Critical Illness , Humans , Renal Dialysis , Retrospective Studies
2.
J Crit Care ; 56: 113-119, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31896444

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Severe acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with a significant risk of mortality and persistent renal replacement therapy (RRT) dependence. The objective of this study was to develop prediction models for mortality at 90-day and 1-year following RRT initiation in critically ill patients with AKI. METHODS: All patients who commenced RRT in the intensive care unit for AKI at a tertiary care hospital between 2007 and 2014 constituted the development cohort. We evaluated the external validity of our mortality models using data from the multicentre OPTIMAL-AKI study. RESULTS: The development cohort consisted of 594 patients, of whom 320(54%) died and 40 (15% of surviving patients) remained RRT-dependent at 90-day Eleven variables were included in the model to predict 90-day mortality (AUC:0.79, 95%CI:0.76-0.82). The performance of the 90-day mortality model declined upon validation in the OPTIMAL-AKI cohort (AUC:0.61, 95%CI:0.54-0.69) and showed modest calibration. Similar results were obtained for mortality model at 1-year. CONCLUSIONS: Routinely collected variables at the time of RRT initiation have limited ability to predict mortality in critically ill patients with AKI who commence RRT.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/mortality , Acute Kidney Injury/therapy , Renal Replacement Therapy , Aged , Area Under Curve , Critical Illness , Decision Making, Shared , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Theoretical , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...