Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Aesthet Surg J ; 42(11): NP688-NP694, 2022 10 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35869540

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) platforms are increasingly being utilized in various healthcare applications. There are few platforms that provide quantifiable assessments of dermatologic or aesthetic conditions by employing industry established scales. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to report the results of a pilot study that evaluated the utilization and functionality of an AI engine to measure and monitor rhytids (fine lines). For this study, glabellar frown lines were employed as the clinical model. METHODS: Seventy-one patients were enrolled and monitored remotely employing current high-quality mobile phone cameras over a 14-day period. The patients were prompted to take photographs employing this platform at preset intervals, and these photographs were then rated by the AI platform and qualified raters experienced in the field of facial aesthetics. RESULTS: The AI platform had concordance with 2 qualified raters of 46% to 68%, and the inter-rater concordance between 2 rates ranged from 44% to 66%. The intra-rater concordance for the raters was between 57% and 84%, whereas the AI platform had a 100% concordance with itself. The participant and investigator satisfaction ratings of the platform were high on multiple dimensions of the platform. CONCLUSIONS: This AI platform evaluated photos on a comparable level of accuracy as the qualified raters, and it evaluated more consistently than the qualified raters. This platform may have high utility in clinical research and development, including the management of clinical trials, and efficient management of patient care at the clinical practices.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Skin Aging , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Pilot Projects
2.
Handb Exp Pharmacol ; 263: 49-62, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31932989

ABSTRACT

Botulinum Neurotoxins have always existed in nature, but its paralytic effect on humans due to the consumption of poorly preserved food was not recognized until 18th century. There are 8 serotypes of botulinum neurotoxins (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H). Serotype A have been the most recognized one and was initially developed for large scale production in 1940's. The first batch for clinical use was produced by Edward Schantz, who collaborated with Dr. Alan Scott, an ophthalmologist, evaluating botulinum neurotoxin to treat strabismus. The process Schantz used had variability and led to inconsistent batch production. However, this process is still used by various manufacturers of commercial botulinum neurotoxin products as the foundation. These manufacturers have refined the manufacturing of botulinum neurotoxins by implementing new advanced techniques, including better potency assays. Despite the improvements in the manufacturing process, botulinum neurotoxins are still one of the most potent molecules and therefore, require special handing and additional safety/security measurements during production.


Subject(s)
Botulinum Toxins , Humans , Neurotoxins/chemistry
3.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 142(6): 847e-855e, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30489516

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Botulinum neurotoxins, which are widely used commercially for therapeutic and cosmetic applications, have historically belonged to serotypes A and B. Serotype E has a distinct profile with a faster onset and shorter duration of effect. EB-001 is a proprietary formulation of serotype E in development for aesthetic (cosmetic) and therapeutic uses. METHODS: This first-in-human, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, ascending-dose cohort study enrolled 42 subjects who received EB-001 (n = 35) or placebo (n = 7). The efficacy primary outcome was the proportion of subjects with a two-grade investigator-rated improvement in glabellar frown line severity at maximum frown. Safety evaluations included adverse events, laboratory tests, and physical examinations. RESULTS: A two-grade investigator-rated response was observed starting in the third cohort (EB-001), with increased rates observed at higher doses. Onset of clinical effect was within 24 hours, with a duration ranging between 14 and 30 days for the highest doses. Adverse event incidence was low, with the most common being mild to moderate headache. There were no serious adverse events or ptosis, and there were no clinically significant changes in other safety assessments. CONCLUSIONS: In this clinical study in glabellar frown lines, EB-001 showed favorable safety, tolerability, and dose-dependent efficacy, with an 80 percent response rate at the highest dose. The maximum clinical effect of EB-001 was seen within 24 hours and lasted between 14 and 30 days. This differentiated EB-001 profile supports its development for aesthetic and therapeutic applications where fast onset and short duration of effect are desirable. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.


Subject(s)
Botulinum Toxins/administration & dosage , Forehead , Neuromuscular Agents/administration & dosage , Skin Aging/drug effects , Adolescent , Adult , Botulinum Toxins/adverse effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neuromuscular Agents/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...