Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 95(38): e4336, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27661011

ABSTRACT

Autoimmune diseases are considered the 3rd leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the industrialized countries. Autoimmune thyroid diseases (ATDs) are associated with high prevalence of nonorgan-specific autoantibodies, such as antinuclear antibodies (ANA), antidouble-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (anti-dsDNA), antiextractable-nuclear antigens (anti-ENAs), rheumatoid factor (RF), and anticyclic-citrullinated peptides (anti-CCP) whose clinical significance is unknown.We aimed to assess the prevalence of various nonorgan-specific autoantibodies in patients with ATD, and to investigate the possible association between these autoantibodies and occurrence of rheumatic diseases and, if these autoantibodies could be considered as predictor markers for autoimmune rheumatic diseases in the future.This study had 2 phases: phase 1; in which 61 ATD patients free from rheumatic manifestations were assessed for the presence of these nonorgan-specific autoantibodies against healthy 61 control group, followed by 2nd phase longitudinal clinical follow-up in which cases are monitored systematically to establish occurrence and progression of any rheumatic disease in association to these autoantibodies with its influences and prognosis.Regarding ATD patients, ANA, anti-dsDNA, Anti-ENA, and RF were present in a percentage of (50.8%), (18%), (21.3%), and (34.4%), respectively, with statistically significance difference (P < 0.5) rather than controls. Nearly one third of the studied group (32.8%) developed the rheumatic diseases, over 2 years follow-up. It was obvious that those with positive anti-dsDNA had higher risk (2.45 times) to develop rheumatic diseases than those without. There was a statistically significant positive linear relationship between occurrence of disease in months and (age, anti-dsDNA, anti-CCP, RF, and duration of thyroiditis). Anti-dsDNA and RF are the most significant predictors (P < 0.0001).ATD is more associated with rheumatic diseases than previously thought. Anti-dsDNA, RF, and anti-CCP antibodies may be used as predictive screening markers of systemic lupus erythematosus and RA, with early referral to rheumatologists for close follow-up and early diagnoses for appropriate disease management of the disease, as early disease control will allow better quality of life.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Antinuclear/blood , Autoantibodies/blood , Rheumatic Diseases/etiology , Thyroiditis, Autoimmune/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Biomarkers/blood , Case-Control Studies , DNA/immunology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Linear Models , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Peptides, Cyclic/immunology , Prevalence , Rheumatic Diseases/epidemiology , Rheumatoid Factor/blood , Risk Factors , Thyroiditis, Autoimmune/complications , Time Factors , Young Adult
2.
Saudi Med J ; 26(7): 1051-4, 2005 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16047050

ABSTRACT

With the number of patients presently awaiting renal transplantation exceeding the number of cadaveric organs available, there is an increasing reliance on live renal donation. Of the 11,869 renal transplants performed in 2002 in the US, 52.6% were living donors from the United Network for Organ Sharing Registry. Renal allografts from living donors provide: superior immediate long-term function; require less waiting time and are more cost-effective than those from cadaveric donors. However, anticipation of postoperative pain and temporary occupational disability may dissuade many potential donors. Additionally, some recipients hesitate to accept a living donor kidney due to suffering that would be endured by the donor. It is a unique medical situation when a young, completely healthy donor undergoes a major surgical procedure to provide an organ for transplantation. It is mandatory to offer a surgical technique, which is safe and with minimal complications. It is also obvious for any organ transplantation, that the integrity of the organ remain intact, thus, enabling its successful transplantation into the recipient. An acceptably short ischemia time and adequate lengths of ureter and renal vasculature are favored. Many centers are performing laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy in an effort to ease convalescence of renal donors. This may encourage the consideration of live donation by recipients and potential donors.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Laparoscopy , Nephrectomy/methods , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/methods , Humans
3.
J Urol ; 173(6): 1903-7, 2005 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15879772

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We report intermediate term oncological followup data on 56 patients undergoing laparoscopic renal cryoablation, of whom each completed a 3-year followup. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Since September 1997, 56 patients undergoing laparoscopic renal cryoablation have completed a followup of 3 years each. The postoperative followup protocol comprised serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1 day, months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24, and yearly thereafter for 5 years. Computerized tomography guided needle biopsy of the cryolesion was performed 6 months postoperatively and repeated if MRI findings were abnormal. Followup data were obtained prospectively. RESULTS: For a mean renal tumor size of 2.3 cm mean intraoperative size of the created cryolesion was 3.6 cm. Sequential mean cryolesion size on MRI on postoperative 1 day, and at 3 and 6 months, and 1, 2 and 3 years was 3.7, 2.8, 2.3, 1.7, 1.2 and 0.9 cm, representing a 26%, 39%, 56%, 69% and 75% percent reduction in cryolesion size at 3 and 6 months, and 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. At 3 years 17 cryolesions (38%) had completely disappeared on MRI. Postoperative needle biopsy identified locally persistent/recurrent renal tumor in 2 patients. In the 51 patients undergoing cryotherapy for a unilateral, sporadic renal tumor 3-year cancer specific survival was 98%. There was no open conversion, kidney loss, urinary fistula, dialysis requirement, or perirenal or port site recurrence in any patients. CONCLUSIONS: Three-year outcomes following renal cryoablation are encouraging. Longer term (5-year) data are necessary to determine the proper place of renal cryotherapy among minimally invasive, nephron sparing options.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Cryosurgery , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Laparoscopy , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy, Needle , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kidney/pathology , Kidney Function Tests , Kidney Neoplasms/mortality , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Survival Rate
4.
BJU Int ; 94(3): 446, 2004 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15291889
6.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther ; 3(6): 830-6, 2003 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14686705

ABSTRACT

New minimally invasive technologies are currently being applied to the management of renal cell carcinoma in an effort to decrease operative time, pain, morbidity and hospital stay. Foremost among these is the burgeoning role of laparoscopy in tumor destruction and complete in vivo resection. The primary modalities in clinical use today are laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, laparoscopic renal cryoablation and laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation. Most initial reports include only highly selected patients with unifocal, small, exophytic, peripheral lesions away from the collecting system. As experience with these techniques increases, larger and more difficult lesions are being approached laparoscopically, with promising anecdotal results reported. Laparoscopic access to the kidney may be retroperitoneal or transperitoneal. Complete tumor destruction with maximal preservation of unaffected nephrons remains the goal. Herein, an update on laparoscopic surgery for renal cell carcinoma is presented. For each procedure, the current indications and contraindications, perioperative data, complications and oncological outcomes are described. In the future, it appears likely that laparoscopy will play a major role in the established treatment options for renal cell carcinoma, with open surgery being reserved for specific indications.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Humans , Laparoscopy/trends
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...