ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess patients' views and expectations with regard to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy (IVT). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, non-interventional, prospective cohort study including nAMD patients treated with IVT in Germany. Patients with at least one IVT before study enrollment and aged ≥50 years were included. Three telephone interviews were conducted during a 12-month observational period. Here, patient's beliefs/expectations with regard to the nAMD disease and the IVT treatment were discussed. Only patients who completed all three phone interviews were included in the analyses. We used a two-step cluster analysis to identify patient clusters regarding specific patient attitudes towards nAMD and its treatment. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty-two patients completed all interviews (mean age of 76.4 ± 7.2 years, 59.0% women). Out of these, 57.8% acknowledged that they needed general assistance in daily life, while 77.4% stated being able to attend general medical appointments on their own. However, 64.7% needed a driver or an accompanying person to attend their IVT appointments. In addition, 3.9% of the patients were afraid of IVT side effects. Also, 87.3% and 43.1% of the patients could name their disease or the anti-VEGF drug administered, respectively. More than three-quarters of the patients (83.1%) were aware of possible consequences of nAMD by stating vision loss or blindness, but only 16.6% knew that nAMD is a chronic disease. Generally, patients were optimistic: 70.2%, 5.1% and 13.0% of them expected stable visual acuity (VA), a significant improvement or expected worsening of VA in the next year, respectively. Almost two thirds of patients who provided their therapy expectations (47.0%) anticipated fewer injections/discontinuation of IVT. We identified five patient clusters differing significantly from each other with regard to four variables: being afraid of IVT, nAMD disease awareness, optimism with regard to effectiveness of IVT, and nAMD disease and treatment knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: Only a minority of patients is aware of the chronic nature of nAMD. To motivate patients to accept a life-long IVT treatment, physicians and caregivers must know that there exist different patient types with significant differences in communication needs.
Subject(s)
Bevacizumab/administration & dosage , Ranibizumab/administration & dosage , Visual Acuity , Wet Macular Degeneration/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/antagonists & inhibitors , Wet Macular Degeneration/physiopathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) is a progressive and degenerative retinal disease. This study reports the real-life use in Germany of the standard anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy for wAMD as an intravitreal operative drug application. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Within the framework of an international retrospective study the medical records of patients with wAMD who were first treated with ranibizumab between 1 January and 31 August 2009 were evaluated. Data were collected until the end of treatment and/or monitoring or until 31 August 2011. The primary objective was to evaluate changes in visual acuity after the start of anti-VEGF therapy. Secondary outcomes included determining real-life anti-VEGF treatment regimens and disease-monitoring practices. RESULTS: Out of 2227 patients who received ≥ 1 anti-VEGF injection with a baseline visual acuity assessment and ≥ 1 post-baseline visual acuity assessment for the treated eye, 420 were included in the German cohort. Visual acuity improved until about day 90 but these gains in visual acuity were not maintained. The mean changes in visual acuity scores from baseline to years 1 and 2 were 1.1 ± 15.7 and - 0.8 ± 17.2 letters, respectively. Patients received a mean of 4.3 ± 1.9 and 1.3 ± 2.2 injections in years 1 and 2, respectively. The majority of visits ( 98.6 %) were conducted irregularly and outside the time frame recommended at the time of the study, with an average of 47.7 ± 36.7 days between visits. More frequent visits and injections were associated with greater improvements in visual acuity. CONCLUSION: Treatment intensity was not sufficient to maintain the initial improvement in visual acuity by ranibizumab treatment. Real-life results for visual acuity and injection frequency in the German cohort were worse at that time than in other countries. Regular follow-up visits as well as timely retreatment in the presence of signs of disease activity are required to achieve optimal results in wAMD when applying a pro re nata-based strategy.
