Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Rev Panam Salud Publica ; 28(2): 107-13, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20963277

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the process used to implement a comprehensive, standardized, and reliable national system for data collection for HIV care and treatment in Guyana; to provide examples of the program-level data resulting from implementation; and to highlight the monitoring benefits for national programs. METHODS: In 2007, Guyana's Ministry of Health and other key stakeholders adapted the World Health Organization's generic HIV care and antiretroviral therapy (ART) patient monitoring guidelines to fit the Guyana context, which included modifying the patient chart, patient registers, and cross-sectional and cohort reports. Following initial training and feedback from clinical staff, a national patient monitoring system (PMS) was finalized, piloted, and implemented at all care and treatment sites. Thereafter, sites received monthly supportive supervisory visits to review data collection and validate reports. RESULTS: Implementation of the PMS enabled analysis of cohort data for patients on ART. After 12 months, 79% of a combined national cohort of all 50 patients who started ART in June 2007 were alive and on first-line ART regimens. After six years, 58% of the first (April 2002) cohort of ART patients in the country were alive and on ART, with only two (8%) patients on second-line regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a national PMS for standardized data collection and reporting across multiple clinical sites ultimately provided important and reliable information on utilization of services, patient outcomes, and survival rates on treatment. These data are used at the national level to monitor the efficacy of the HIV care and treatment program. Successful implementation requires early inclusion of all committed stakeholders and a dedicated human resource team to ensure sustainability of the system.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/epidemiology , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/organization & administration , Population Surveillance/methods , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Collection , Forms and Records Control , Guyana/epidemiology , HIV Infections/therapy , Health Policy , Health Priorities , Humans , Medical Records/standards , National Health Programs/organization & administration , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/methods , Pan American Health Organization , World Health Organization
2.
Rev. panam. salud pública ; 28(2): 107-113, Aug. 2010. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-561448

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the process used to implement a comprehensive, standardized, and reliable national system for data collection for HIV care and treatment in Guyana; to provide examples of the program-level data resulting from implementation; and to highlight the monitoring benefits for national programs. METHODS: In 2007, Guyana's Ministry of Health and other key stakeholders adapted the World Health Organization's generic HIV care and antiretroviral therapy (ART) patient monitoring guidelines to fit the Guyana context, which included modifying the patient chart, patient registers, and cross-sectional and cohort reports. Following initial training and feedback from clinical staff, a national patient monitoring system (PMS) was finalized, piloted, and implemented at all care and treatment sites. Thereafter, sites received monthly supportive supervisory visits to review data collection and validate reports. RESULTS: Implementation of the PMS enabled analysis of cohort data for patients on ART. After 12 months, 79 percent of a combined national cohort of all 50 patients who started ART in June 2007 were alive and on first-line ART regimens. After six years, 58 percent of the first (April 2002) cohort of ART patients in the country were alive and on ART, with only two (8 percent) patients on second-line regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a national PMS for standardized data collection and reporting across multiple clinical sites ultimately provided important and reliable information on utilization of services, patient outcomes, and survival rates on treatment. These data are used at the national level to monitor the efficacy of the HIV care and treatment program. Successful implementation requires early inclusion of all committed stakeholders and a dedicated human resource team to ensure sustainability of the system.


OBJETIVO: Describir el proceso utilizado con el objeto de poner en práctica un sistema nacional integral, estandarizado y confiable de recopilación de datos sobre la atención y el tratamiento de la infección por el VIH en Guyana; suministrar ejemplos de los datos que se obtuvieron mediante el programa durante la ejecución; y subrayar las ventajas de la vigilancia para los programas nacionales. MÉTODOS: En el 2007, el Ministerio de Salud de Guyana y otros actores claves adaptaron al contexto de Guyana las directrices básicas de la Organización Mundial de la Salud sobre el seguimiento de los pacientes con VIH que reciben atención y tratamiento antirretrovírico; la adaptación implicó modificaciones en el expediente clínico, el registro de los pacientes, los informes transversales y los informes de cohortes. Después de una capacitación inicial y la retroalimentación por parte del personal médico, se finalizó un sistema nacional de seguimiento de los pacientes, que se puso a prueba y se puso en marcha en todos los centros de atención y tratamiento. Posteriormente, se realizaron visitas mensuales de supervisión y apoyo a los centros, con el fin de examinar la recopilación de los datos y validar los informes. RESULTADOS: La ejecución del programa de vigilancia de los pacientes permitió el análisis de los datos de las cohortes de pacientes en tratamiento antirretrovírico. Después de 12 meses, se encontró que 79 por ciento de una cohorte nacional combinada de los 50 pacientes que comenzaron tratamiento antirretrovírico en junio del 2007 estaban vivos y recibían tratamiento con antirretrovíricos de primera línea. Después de seis años, 58 por ciento de la primera cohorte de pacientes tratados con antirretrovíricos en el país (abril del 2002) estaban vivos, continuaban el tratamiento y solo dos pacientes (8 por ciento) recibían medicamentos de segunda línea. CONCLUSIONES: La ejecución de un programa nacional de supervisión de los pacientes con recopilación y notificación estandarizada de los datos en múltiples centros clínicos suministró en último término información importante y confiable sobre la utilización de los servicios, el desenlace clínico de los pacientes y las tasas de supervivencia con el tratamiento. Estos datos se usan a escala nacional con el fin de vigilar la eficacia del programa de atención y tratamiento de la infección por el VIH. La ejecución eficaz del programa exige la participación temprana de todos los actores claves comprometidos y un equipo de recursos humanos dedicado a velar por la sostenibilidad del sistema.


Subject(s)
Humans , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/organization & administration , Population Surveillance/methods , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Collection , Forms and Records Control , Guyana/epidemiology , HIV Infections/therapy , Health Policy , Health Priorities , Medical Records/standards , National Health Programs/organization & administration , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/methods , Pan American Health Organization , World Health Organization
4.
JAMA ; 294(21): 2734-43, 2005 Dec 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16333009

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: On January 24, 2003, the US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) implemented a preparedness program in which smallpox (vaccinia) vaccine was administered to federal, state, and local volunteers who might be first responders during a bioterrorism event. OBJECTIVE: To describe results from the comprehensive DHHS smallpox vaccine safety monitoring and response system. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Descriptive study of adverse event reports from the DHHS smallpox vaccine safety monitoring and response system received between January 24 and October 31, 2003, through the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A total of 37,901 volunteers in 55 jurisdictions received at least 1 dose of smallpox vaccine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of vaccinations administered and description of adverse events and reporting rates. RESULTS: A total of 38,885 smallpox vaccinations were administered, with a take rate of 92%. VAERS received 822 reports of adverse events following smallpox vaccination (overall reporting rate, 217 per 10,000 vaccinees). A total of 590 adverse events (72%) were reported within 14 days of vaccination. Nonserious adverse events (n = 722) included multiple signs and symptoms of mild and self-limited local reactions. One hundred adverse events (12%) were designated as serious, resulting in 85 hospitalizations, 2 permanent disabilities, 10 life-threatening illnesses, and 3 deaths. Among the serious adverse events, 21 cases were classified as myocarditis and/or pericarditis and 10 as ischemic cardiac events that were not anticipated based on historical data. Two cases of generalized vaccinia and 1 case of postvaccinial encephalitis were detected. No preventable life-threatening adverse reactions, contact transmissions, or adverse reactions that required treatment with vaccinia immune globulin were identified. Serious adverse events were more common among older revaccinees than younger first-time vaccinees. CONCLUSIONS: Rigorous smallpox vaccine safety screening, educational programs, and older vaccinees may have contributed to low rates of preventable life-threatening adverse reactions. Other rare, clinically significant, or unexpected cardiac adverse events were detected by timely review of VAERS data and intensive clinical case investigation.


Subject(s)
Population Surveillance , Smallpox Vaccine/adverse effects , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , Humans , United States/epidemiology
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 39(11): 1660-6, 2004 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15578368

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Superinfection is an adverse event following smallpox vaccination. The clinical presentation is similar to that of a large normal vaccine reaction or "robust take," and the frequency is unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all reported severe local reactions consistent with superinfection among United States civilian smallpox vaccinees from January 2003 through January 2004. We applied a standard case definition and estimated the frequency of superinfection following smallpox vaccination. RESULTS: We identified 48 reported cases for further review among 39,350 [corrected] smallpox vaccinees. Two (4%) of the 48 reported cases met the case definition for superinfection; neither of the patients had a pathogenic organism isolated from their infection site. Both were treated with antibiotics and resolved their infection. Of the 46 cases determined not to be superinfection, 41 (89%) were temporally consistent with a large normal vaccine reaction. Thirty (75%) of 40 reported case patients for whom data were available received antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Superinfection following smallpox vaccination is rare. Most of the reported superinfection cases were probably large normal smallpox vaccine reactions. Educating providers about the normal response to smallpox vaccine may decrease the overdiagnosis of superinfection and the unnecessary use of antimicrobials.


Subject(s)
Superinfection/epidemiology , Vaccinia/epidemiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Population Surveillance , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology
6.
Am J Epidemiol ; 157(5): 399-408, 2003 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12615604

ABSTRACT

Epidemiologists respond to the information needs of health professionals. Although medical professionals are routine users of epidemiologic information, use within medical specialties varies remarkably. To explore the variation in use of epidemiologic information across clinical medical specialties, the authors examined the scientific literature by analyzing patterns of citation of specific journal articles to and by the American Journal of Epidemiology (AJE). A total of 178,396 journal citations to and 126,478 citations by AJE were made from 1983 through 1999; citations were classified according to the subject category of the referencing or referenced journal. Clinical medical journals accounted for 50.6% of all citations combined (both referenced to and referenced by AJE); general/internal medicine (17.9%), cancer (10.4%), and cardiovascular (4.9%) journals had the highest number of citations. Few citations to and by AJE were found in publications specializing in dermatology, gastroenterology, orthopedics, allergy, anesthesiology, surgery, rheumatology, and other areas. Trend patterns of citations between clinical and epidemiologic literature indicated that citations to the fields of cardiovascular disease and cancer are increasing, whereas citations regarding pediatrics have remained stable. This analysis suggests an increasing interchange of information between epidemiologists and clinicians specializing in certain fields, uncovering potential research opportunities for epidemiologists.


Subject(s)
Bibliometrics , Epidemiology/statistics & numerical data , Periodicals as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Humans
7.
Inj Control Saf Promot ; 9(4): 249-53, 2002 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12613104

ABSTRACT

Injuries are among the leading causes of death in Jamaica. Homicide rates have been sharply increasing since 1991. In 1997, the rate of homicide (45/100,000) in Jamaica was over five times the US rate in 1997 (7.9/100,000). In response to this problem and the alarming increase in non-fatal assaultive injuries, the Jamaican Ministry of Health together with the CDC established a Violence-Related Injury Surveillance System (VRISS) using patient registration data from Kingston Public Hospital. The VRISS was evaluated for usefulness, and for system attributes: system acceptability, simplicity, flexibility, sensitivity, and predictive value positive (PVP). System-identified cases were compared with clinical records and data from direct patient interviews. The surveillance system was flexible, acceptable to clinical staff and Ministry officials, and moderately sensitive, detecting 62% to 69% of violent injuries identified from clinical records and a patient survey. The system's predictive value positive was high, with 86% of potential cases confirmed as actual cases. Although adequate, system sensitivity was reduced by incomplete or no registration of patients during periods of staff shortage. In conclusion, despite some logistic shortcomings, the system appeared promising for collecting limited information on non-fatal interpersonal violent injuries. With modification and expansion, the system may be capable of collecting unintentional-injury data also.


Subject(s)
Hospital Information Systems , Population Surveillance/methods , Quality of Health Care , Violence/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Health Care Costs , Hospital Information Systems/economics , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Jamaica/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , Violence/prevention & control , Wounds and Injuries/etiology , Wounds and Injuries/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...