Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Reprod Immunol ; 154: 103759, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36332368

ABSTRACT

The link between autoimmune thyroid diseases and reproductive failures, including implantation failure and pregnancy loss, has been attracted a great deal of attention in the last two decades. In this regard, a considerable progress has been achieved in understanding the etiopathogenesis of the adverse pregnancy consequences related to the presence of anti-thyroid antibodies, however, the exact action mechanisms of these antibodies are not fully comprehended. Thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPOAbs), thyroglobulin antibodies (TgAbs) and TSH receptor antibodies (TRAbs) are the anti-thyroid antibodies which are present in autoimmune thyroid disorder (AITD) patients, such as Hashimoto's thyroiditis. In this condition, the thyroid hormones production, which are essential for normal implantation and pregnancy, are disrupted, and compromise the embryo or fetus development. In addition, a hypothesis suggests that there is underlying generalized immune abnormalities behind the presence of these antibodies. On the other hand, similar immunologic aberrations have been observed in thyroid autoimmunity and reproductive complications, which are postulated to be the proper answer for the scientists who seek for the pathophysiology behind the presence of these antibodies. Elevated inflammatory responses and decreased immunoregulatory actions, seem to be the main interfering pathologic factors in maternal tolerance toward fetus. In addition, cross reactivity of these antibodies with antigenic determinants of egg, embryo and placenta is another suggested mechanism, causing implantation and pregnancy complications. The ability of anti-thyroid antibodies in passing through the placental barrier and affecting the fetal thyroid gland, makes them more threatening for maintenance of a pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Spontaneous , Pregnancy Complications , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Placenta , Autoantibodies , Thyroid Gland , Autoimmunity
2.
J Int Med Res ; 50(9): 3000605221119662, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36076361

ABSTRACT

Due to the hypercoagulable status of patients with severe COVID-19 infection, anticoagulants are often used to prevent thrombosis. However, these agents may cause bleeding events such as retroperitoneal hematoma (RPH). We report here on six patients with COVID-19 who developed RPH during treatment. Early evidence of bleeding led to confirmatory diagnosis with imaging. Four patients recovered with supportive treatment (IV fluids and blood transfusions) and two patients recovered by angioembolization. RPH should be considered in COVID patients on anticoagulants as soon as haemoglobin or blood pressure falls. Further studies are required to provide guidance and recommendations on use of anticoagulants in critically ill patients with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , COVID-19/complications , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/complications , Hematoma/chemically induced , Hematoma/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Retroperitoneal Space/diagnostic imaging
3.
J Res Med Sci ; 19(8): 703-8, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25422653

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Some evidence has shown benefits of probiotics in the management of minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE). We evaluated the efficacy of a multistrain probiotic compound, alone and in combination with lactulose, in the treatment of MHE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study has two parts. First, consecutive adult patients with MHE were randomized to receive lactulose (30-60 mL/day) + probiotic (200 million colony forming units of seven bacteria species/day) (Gp-LPr) or lactulose + placebo (Gp-L). In second part, a non-randomized group of patients received probiotic alone (Gp-Pr). Medication duration was for 2 weeks and patients were followed-up for another 8 weeks. Improvement in MHE status was assessed by psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES). Development of overt encephalopathy, hospitalization, and death were considered as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Sixty patients (80% male, mean age 38.4 ± 9.6 years) completed the intervention. PHES significantly improved after medication in all the three groups (Gp-LPr: -3.8 ± 3.9 to -1.6 ± 3.0; Gp-L: -4.8 ± 4.1 to -1.6 ± 2.9; and Gp-Pr: -4.9 ± 3.7 to -2.1 ± 2.5, P < 0.001). After 8 weeks follow-up, improvement was maintained in Gp-LPr and Gp-Pr, but there was deterioration in those who did not receive probiotics (Gp-L: PHES score reversed to -4.8 ± 4.2). Two patients (one each in Gp-L and Gp-Pr) experienced overt encephalopathy. One patient was hospitalized due to worsening of ascites (Gp-LPr) and one due to spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (Gp-L). Side effects were mild and not significantly different among the groups. CONCLUSION: Lactulose and probiotics are effective for the treatment of MHE; however, probiotics, but not lactulose, have long-term effects. More studies are required before suggesting probiotics for the standard treatment of MHE.

4.
Adv Biomed Res ; 3: 140, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25161987

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evidence has shown beneficial effects of probiotics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS); however, there is still a lack of data in this regard. We evaluated the efficacy of a multi-strain probiotic compound on IBS symptoms and quality-of-life (QOL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult IBS patients (n = 132) were randomized to receive a probiotic compound containing seven bacteria species including Lactobacillus strains, Bifidobacterium strains and Streptococcus thermophiles or similar placebo, twice daily after a meal for 14 consecutive days. Improvement of IBS symptoms was assessed in categories of abdominal pain and distension and improvement of bowel habit. Improvement in patients QOL was assessed by the IBS-QOL instrument. Patients were evaluated for symptoms and QOL at baseline and then 1 month after completion of the treatment. RESULTS: After treatment, there was a decrease in abdominal pain and distension severity in both probiotic and the placebo groups (P<0.001), but there was no difference between the two groups in this regard (P>0.05). Improvement in bowel habit was observed in 33.3% of the probiotic and 36.5% of the placebo group (P = 0.910). There was no significant difference between the two groups in QOL after the treatment (P >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We found no beneficial effects over placebo for a 2-week treatment with the above mentioned multi-strain probiotic compound in the treatment of IBS. Further, trials are yet required before a clear conclusion in this regards.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...