Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 28(8): 2187-2192, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31126785

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Return to work (RTW) after stroke is the ultimate goal of the working population to achieve economic independence and well-being. Previous studies have reported lower RTW rates of blue-collar workers versus white-collar workers. Thus, investigating predictive factors for RTW of blue-collar workers is meaningful to improve RTW after stroke. Here, we investigate the physical, cognitive, and social factors associated with the RTW of blue-collar workers after stroke. METHODS: Poststroke rehabilitation data for 71 patients aged 15-64 years who had been active blue-collar workers at stroke onset were analyzed from a single-center observational cohort database. Baseline characteristics, social background factors, and quantitative assessments of the upper limb, lower limb, and cognitive functions at discharge were analyzed to identify any association with RTW. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cutoff value of continuous valuables with significant associations. RESULTS: Functional upper limb represented by an increasing Simple Test for Evaluating hand Function (STEF) score was independently associated with RTW of blue-collar workers by multivariable logistic regression analysis (odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.14; p = .017). Correlation with self-employment status was also significant compared to that with employee status (OR, 185; 95% CI, 1.05-32400; p = .048). The cutoff value of the 100-point scale STEF to discriminate between RTW and non-RTW was 82. CONCLUSIONS: Functional upper limb and self-employment status were independent predictors for the RTW of blue-collar workers after stroke.


Subject(s)
Occupations , Return to Work , Stroke Rehabilitation/methods , Stroke/therapy , Upper Extremity/innervation , Adolescent , Adult , Cognition , Databases, Factual , Female , Health Status , Humans , Job Description , Male , Mental Health , Middle Aged , Occupational Health , Recovery of Function , Retrospective Studies , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/physiopathology , Stroke/psychology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Work Capacity Evaluation , Young Adult
2.
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) ; 56(9): 574-9, 2016 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27396396

ABSTRACT

Perioperative management is critical for positive neurosurgical outcomes. In order to maintain safe and authentic perioperative management, a perioperative management center (PERIO) was introduced to patients of our Neurosurgery Department beginning in June 2014. PERIO involves a multidisciplinary team consisting of anesthesiologists, dentists/dental hygienists/technicians, nurses, physical therapists, pharmacists, and nutritionists. After neurosurgeons decide on the course of surgery, a preoperative evaluation consisting of blood sampling, electrocardiogram, chest X-ray, and lung function test was performed. The patients then visited the PERIO clinic 7-14 days before surgery. One or two days before surgery, the patients without particular issues enter the hospital and receive a mouth cleaning one day before surgery. After surgery, postoperative support involving eating/swallowing evaluation, rehabilitation, and pain control is provided. The differences in duration from admission to surgery, cancellation of surgery, and postoperative complications between PERIO and non-PERIO groups were examined. Eighty-five patients were enrolled in the PERIO group and 131 patients in the non-PERIO group. The duration from admission to surgery was significantly decreased in the PERIO group (3.6 ± 0.3 days), compared to that in the non-PERIO group (4.7 ± 0.2 days). There was one cancelled surgery in the PERIO group and six in the non-PERIO group. Postoperative complications and the overall hospital stay did not differ between the two groups. The PERIO system decreased the duration from admission to surgery, and it is useful in providing high-quality medical service, although the system should be improved so as not to increase the burden on medical staff.


Subject(s)
Neurosurgical Procedures , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Perioperative Care , Hospital Departments/organization & administration , Hospitalization , Humans , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...