Laparoscopic Repair of Pediatric Inguinal Hernia: Disconnection of the Hernial Sac Versus Disconnection and Peritoneal Closure.

Background/Purpose: Many techniques have been described for the treatment of pediatric inguinal hernia (PIH). Some authors emphasized the importance of disconnecting the sac, to create a scar, and to close the peritoneum mimicking the open approach. Others stated that peritoneal disconnection alone is enough for treatment of PIH regardless of the size of the internal ring. In this study, we compare the short-term results of laparoscopic disconnection of PIH sac versus disconnection and peritoneal closure. Patients and Methods: The study was carried from March 2016 to March 2017, on 34 patients with 40 PIH. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: group A, subjected to laparoscopic hernia sac disconnection and group B, subjected to laparoscopic hernia sac disconnection with peritoneal closure. Both groups were compared regarding the operative details, including complications and conversion, postoperative complications and recurrence. Results: Group A included 20 hernias in 15 patients, whereas group B included 20 hernias in 19 patients. The age ranged from 1 to 23 months. In group A, the mean operative time (OT) was 34.6 and 39.4 minutes, for unilateral and bilateral cases, respectively, whereas in group B, it was 45.1 minutes for unilateral cases and 65 minutes for 1 bilateral case. The OT was significantly shorter in group A for unilateral cases. There was no conversion and no intraoperative complications. Three recurrences occurred in group A (15% of hernias/20% of cases) with no recurrences in group B; difference was statistically insignificant. All 3 recurrences occurred in hernias with an internal ring diameter (IRD) >10 mm. Hospital stay was statistically shorter in group B. Conclusion: Both laparoscopic sac disconnection with internal ring closure and sac disconnection only are safe and effective treatments of PIH. However, the latter technique is not recommended for cases with IRD >10 mm because of the unacceptable high recurrence with rings >10 mm.

Laparoscopy in the management of impalpable testis (Series of 64 Cases).

BACKGROUND: The undescended testis represents one of the most common disorders of childhood. Laparoscopy has been widely used both in the diagnosis and treatment of non-palpable testis. In this study, we investigated and evaluated the usefulness of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of no palpable testis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2003 to January 2008, we used laparoscopy in the management of 64 patients with 75 impalpable testes. Their ages varied from 1 to 15 years (median age = 4.6 years). The site and the size of the testes were localised by abdominopelvic ultrasonography in all 64 children for accurate diagnosis. One stage laparoscopic orchiopexy was performed in 26 testes, staged Fowler-Stephens orchiopexy was underwent in 17 testes, while laparoscopic orchidectomy was done in 5 testes. Follow-up by clinical examination and colour Doppler ultrasound was performed in every patient who underwent orchiopexy. RESULTS: There were 11 patients with bilateral non-palpable testes. The overall diagnostic agreement of ultrasound with laparoscopy was seen in only 16 out of 75 testes (21.3%). The results of diagnostic laparoscopy were varied and showed various pathological. Conditions and positioned of the testes, such as 20 low intra-abdominal testes (26.6%), 17 testes were high intra-abdominal (22.7%), and 18 testes (24%) entered the inguinal canal. Associated inguinal hernia was present in 4 patients. After a mean follow-up period of 26 months (6 months - 5 years), all testes were in the bottom of the scrotum except 3 testes were retracted to the neck of the scrotum and atrophy of the testis occurred in 2 patients (2.7%). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy has proven to be the only diagnostic modality where the findings provide a clear dependable direction for the definitive management of impalpable testes, so it allows an accurate diagnosis and definitive treatment in the same sitting.

Parasitic infestations requiring surgical interventions.

Parasitic infestation is common in developing countries especially in Africa. Children are often more vulnerable to these infections. Many health problems result from these infestations, including malnutrition, iron-deficiency anemia, surgical morbidities, and even impaired cognitive function and educational achievement. Surgical intervention may be needed to treat serious complications caused by some of these parasites. Amoebic colitis and liver abscess caused by protozoan infections; intestinal obstruction, biliary infestation with cholangitis and liver abscess, and pancreatitis caused by Ascaris lumbricoides; biliary obstruction caused by Faschiola; hepatic and pulmonary hydatid cysts caused by Echinococcus granulosus and multilocularis are examples. Expenditure of medical care of affected children may cause a great burden on many African governments, which are already suffering from economic instability. The clinical presentation, investigation, and management of some parasitic infestations of surgical relevance in African children are discussed in this article.