Exploring US internal medicine resident career preferences: a Q-methodology study.

Career selection in medicine is a complex and underexplored process. Most medical career studies performed in the U.S. focused on the effect of demographic variables and medical education debt on career choice. Considering ongoing U.S. physician workforce shortages and the trilateral adaptive model of career decision making, a robust assessment of professional attitudes and work-life preferences is necessary. The objective of this study was to explore and define the dominant viewpoints related to career choice selection in a cohort of U.S. IM residents. We administered an electronic Q-sort in which 218 IM residents sorted 50 statements reflecting the spectrum of opinions that influence postgraduate career choice decisions. Participants provided comments that explained the reasoning behind their individual responses. In the final year of residency training, we ascertained participating residents' chosen career. Factor analysis grouped similar sorts and revealed four distinct viewpoints. We characterized the viewpoints as "Fellowship-Bound-Academic," "Altruistic-Longitudinal-Generalist," "Inpatient-Burnout-Aware," and "Lifestyle-Focused-Consultant." There is concordance between residents who loaded significantly onto a viewpoint and their ultimate career choice. Four dominant career choice viewpoints were found among contemporary U.S. IM residents. These viewpoints reflect the intersection of competing priorities, personal interests, professional identity, socio-economic factors, and work/life satisfaction. Better appreciation of determinants of IM residents' career choices may help address workforce shortages and enhance professional satisfaction.

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Hospital Admissions of Emergency Department COVID-19 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have found that among patients testing positive for COVID-19 within a health care system, non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients are more likely than non-Hispanic White patients to be hospitalized. However, previous studies have looked at odds of being admitted using all positive tests in the system and not only those seeking care in the emergency department (ED). OBJECTIVE: This study examined racial/ethnic differences in COVID-19 hospitalizations and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions among patients seeking care for COVID-19 in the ED. RESEARCH DESIGN: Electronic health records (n=7549) were collected from COVID-19 confirmed patients that visited an ED of an urban health care system in the Chicago area between March 2020 and February 2021. RESULTS: After adjusting for possible confounders, White patients had 2.2 times the odds of being admitted to the hospital and 1.5 times the odds of being admitted to the ICU than Black patients. There were no observed differences between White and Hispanic patients. CONCLUSIONS: White patients were more likely than Black patients to be hospitalized after presenting to the ED with COVID-19 and more likely to be admitted directly to the ICU. This finding may be due to racial/ethnic differences in severity of disease upon ED presentation, racial and ethnic differences in access to COVID-19 primary care and/or implicit bias impacting clinical decision-making.

Patient safety intervention to reduce unnecessary red blood cell utilization.

OBJECTIVES: To measure the impact of a local patient safety intervention and a national guideline to reduce unnecessary red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in the Department of Medicine of an academic medical center. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective, pre-post study. METHODS: In May 2013, a clinical practice guideline, modeled after the 2012 AABB recommendations for RBC use, was implemented with the goal of decreasing unnecessary RBC transfusions. This was done using a previously developed model for change management in the Department of Medicine that included academic safety conferences, e-mail safety alerts, and feedback to providers on global blood product utilization. Data regarding the utilization of RBC products were obtained for the time before the AABB guideline, after the AABB guideline but before the local intervention, and after the local intervention (January 2011 through March 2014). RESULTS: Blood product use started to decline after the AABB guideline, but dropped much further after the focused, local interventions were implemented. The proportion of patients receiving a transfusion decreased from 12.6% prior to the AABB guideline to 8.8% after the intervention (P < .001). The percent of total blood use with a hemoglobin level above 8 g/dL decreased from 20.2% to 12.4%; the total units of RBCs transfused per 100 discharges also decreased from 33.4 to 21.7. The direct RBC costs per discharge dropped from $61.60 to $39.70. CONCLUSIONS: Passive adoption of restrictive transfusion guidelines was shown to reduce blood product use on general medicine floors of an academic medical center, but the effect was greatly improved after a local, targeted intervention to improve patient safety was implemented.

An Interferon-Induced Digital Vasculitis-Like Syndrome: A Case Report.

This report describes a patient with chronic hepatitis C undergoing therapy with interferon (IFN) alpha who developed bilateral ischemia of his fingers. We present a 43-year-old man with a failed renal transplant and chronic hepatitis C. He was treated with 6 months of IFN therapy with good reduction of his viral load. He presented with 2 days of pain and swelling in the second digits of both hands. Workup for extrahepatic manifestations of hepatitis C was initiated including assessment for vasculitis because of cryoglobulin- and noncryoglobulin-related causes. Extensive assessment with invasive and noninvasive vascular testing was performed. His workup for vasculitis did not reveal any specific reasons for the ischemic changes. Angiography of his fingers showed mild stenotic changes but no evidence of systemic vasculitis. IFN therapy was stopped and over several weeks his symptoms resolved. The ischemic changes were attributed to IFN therapy. The patient in this report is unique because although IFN has been historically reported to cause a variety of vascular syndromes, the reported experience in hepatitis C patients is small. In addition, the likelihood of encountering vasculitis and vasculitis-like syndromes in patients with hepatitis C is significant, and the increasing use of IFN in this population makes drug-induced vascular changes an essential consideration in this subset of patients.

An exploratory analysis of the correlation of pain scores, patient satisfaction with relief from pain, and a new measure of pain control on the total dose of opioids in pain care.

OBJECTIVE: We explored the associations between opioid dose and multiple measures of pain. STUDY DESIGN AND MEASURES: Thirty-two consecutive patients admitted solely for an acute exacerbation of cancer-related pain or for surgery were followed for their entire hospital stay (115 days of pain). For each hospital day, we collected pain scores, the number of pain scores, trends in pain scores, the percentage of time patients had 100% acceptable relief from pain, and the number of times patients were asked about acceptable pain relief. Finally, we asked those who had 100% relief of pain whether they could have used more pain medicine. Linear regression models were fit to estimate the amount of variation explained (R) in dose of medication, by each pain measurement variable. RESULTS: Nineteen patients with cancer (74 days of pain) and 13 patients undergoing surgery (41 days of pain) were evaluated. Pain scores, the number of pain scores, trends in pain scores, and 100% acceptable relief scores poorly correlated with the use of medication in the linear regression models (R for all models ≤0.2). A question about needing more pain medicine explained the greatest amount of variation in opioid dose. CONCLUSIONS: Pain and acceptable relief scores do not adequately reflect the use of medication. A prospective study is needed to further assess the value of additional measures of the adequacy of pain care.

Diagnostic error in medicine: analysis of 583 physician-reported errors.

BACKGROUND: Missed or delayed diagnoses are a common but understudied area in patient safety research. To better understand the types, causes, and prevention of such errors, we surveyed clinicians to solicit perceived cases of missed and delayed diagnoses. METHODS: A 6-item written survey was administered at 20 grand rounds presentations across the United States and by mail at 2 collaborating institutions. Respondents were asked to report 3 cases of diagnostic errors and to describe their perceived causes, seriousness, and frequency. RESULTS: A total of 669 cases were reported by 310 clinicians from 22 institutions. After cases without diagnostic errors or lacking sufficient details were excluded, 583 remained. Of these, 162 errors (28%) were rated as major, 241 (41%) as moderate, and 180 (31%) as minor or insignificant. The most common missed or delayed diagnoses were pulmonary embolism (26 cases [4.5% of total]), drug reactions or overdose (26 cases [4.5%]), lung cancer (23 cases [3.9%]), colorectal cancer (19 cases [3.3%]), acute coronary syndrome (18 cases [3.1%]), breast cancer (18 cases [3.1%]), and stroke (15 cases [2.6%]). Errors occurred most frequently in the testing phase (failure to order, report, and follow-up laboratory results) (44%), followed by clinician assessment errors (failure to consider and overweighing competing diagnosis) (32%), history taking (10%), physical examination (10%), and referral or consultation errors and delays (3%). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians readily recalled multiple cases of diagnostic errors and were willing to share their experiences. Using a new taxonomy tool and aggregating cases by diagnosis and error type revealed patterns of diagnostic failures that suggested areas for improvement. Systematic solicitation and analysis of such errors can identify potential preventive strategies.

Computer-based simulation as a teaching tool for residents treating patients with cancer-related pain crises.

CONTEXT: Residents often fail to escalate narcotics to ensure pain relief in patients with cancer because of fear of overdose. A computer simulation of patients in pain may provide a way to improve management without fear of harm. We developed a pain care simulation to train residents. STUDY DESIGN/MEASURES: Thirty-one residents trained on 2 to 3 consecutive simulated patients. Simulated cases were assigned variable tolerances to narcotics and starting pain scores. The goals of training were as follows: (1) rapid induction of pain relief, (2) measurement of pain response at appropriate times, and (3) early institution and escalation in care long-acting pain medication to ensure stable pain control for 48 hours. Seven reviewers judged graphical summaries of care and assessed if pain improved, worsened, or stayed the same. RESULTS: Thirty-one residents participated: 25 completed 3 simulations; 6 completed only 2. Sixty-eight percent improved from case 1 to 2; 90% improved by 3. The average pain score declined from 2.5 in case 1 to 1.9 in case 3 (P = .04). Rescue medication use declined from 37% for the first case to 23% by the third (P = .18). Reviewers' intraclass correlation for improved pain care was 0.821 (95% CI, 0.721-0.895). CONCLUSIONS: Residents improved using a pain treatment simulator. A graphical representation of pain scores more than 48 hours of care that provides a useful way to assess pain control. Lessons learned may translate into improved patient care.

Effects of training on a simulator of pain care on the quality of pain care for patients with cancer-related pain.

CONTEXT: A computer simulator of pain care provided an environment for residents to learn to (1) rapidly induce pain relief; (2) measure pain scores at appropriate time intervals; (3) use induction doses to estimate, early in care, the long-acting pain medication requirements; and (4) escalate long-acting agents to ensure a smooth and nonvarying pain-control curve. We studied whether lessons learned on the simulator translated into improved pain control for patients with cancer-related pain crises. STUDY DESIGN AND MEASURES: We compared pain scores for 48 hours in 2 groups: 20 patients admitted consecutively, solely because of an acute exacerbation of pain, prior to training our residents on a simulator and 20 patients post-training. Training at the beginning of an oncology rotation consisted of education about pain control followed by practice on simulated cases of patients with cancer-related pain crises. Outcome measures were average pain scores compared using linear regression and the frequency of using long-acting agents early in a patient's care. RESULTS: Pain control in the first 48 hours of care improved in the postintervention period; the slope of the pain scores actually increased in the preintervention period and declined in the postintervention period (P < .0005). Residents used long-acting agents early in patients' care in 35% (7/20) in the preperiod and 90% (18/20) in the postperiod (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Residents developed pain care treatment skills on a computer-based simulator that translated into improved control of acute, cancer-related pain.

Organizational and cultural changes for providing safe patient care.

OBJECTIVE: To describe an approach and experience with fostering a culture of patient safety. METHODS: (1) Organizational Change-The Department of Medicine established a patient safety committee (PSC) and charged it with reviewing adverse events. (2) Cultural Change-PSC sponsors and participants work to promote a culture of collaboration, study, learning, and prevention versus a culture of blame. (3) Collaboration-The PSC includes chief residents and members from medical informatics, nursing, pharmacy, quality assurance, risk management, and utilization management. (4) Evolution-The duties of the PSC progressed from merely learning from adverse event reports to implementing patient safety and quality improvement projects. (5) Standardization-The PSC uses standard definitions and procedures when reviewing cases of adverse events, and when conducting patient safety and quality improvement projects. RESULTS: (1) Developed an online adverse event reporting system, shortening the average report collection time by 2 days and increasing the number of adverse events reported. (2) Established a model for change using (a) safety rounds with residents, (b) e-mail safety alerts, and, in some cases, (c) decision alerts using electronic order entry. These changes in culture and capability led to improvements in care and improved financial results. CONCLUSIONS: Senior management support of a culture of learning and prevention and an organizational structure that promotes collaboration has provided an environment in which patient safety initiatives can flourish by providing not only safer and higher quality patient care but also a positive financial return on investment.