Systemic lupus erythematosus diagnosed during hospitalization: Greater baseline disease activity, short-term damage, and death / Lupus eritematoso sistémico diagnosticado durante una internación: mayor actividad basal de la enfermedad, daño y muerte a corto plazo

ABSTRACT Objectives: To analyze initial and follow-up features of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) diagnosed during hospitalization. Methods: Retrospective analysis of medical records: two groups were studied, a) SLE diagnosed during hospitalization (SLEin), b) SLE diagnosed on an outpatient basis (SLEout). Results: 123 patients were assessed, 87% female, mean age at diagnosis was 34 years and 45 (37%) of them were SLEin. Patients in the SLEin group had a median of 144 days from the onset of symptoms to diagnosis of SLE vs. 287 days in the SLEout group (p = 0.04). Initially, SLEin had an average SLEDAI of 10 vs. 8 in SLEout (p = 0.004) and anti-dsDNA was positive in 71% vs. 53% in SLEout (p = 0.07). Within the first 6 months, the average cumulative glucocorticoid dose was 6493 mg in SLEin patients vs. 3563 mg in SLEout (p < 0.001) and immunosuppressant usage was higher in SLEin: 62% vs. 26% in SLEout (p<0.001). Within the first year, SLEin's kidney biopsies showed lupus nephritis III or IV in 31% vs. 12% in SLEout (p = 0.003, log-rank test). Within the first 2 years, 6 SLEin patients died vs. 1 SLEout patient (p = 0.02) and SLEin patients had more damage as measured by SLICC/ACR Damage Index (median 0, range 25%-75% 0-1 vs. median 0, range 25%-75% 0-0 in SLEout; p = 0.04). Conclusions: SLEin are initially more active, require higher doses of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants, have more significant kidney involvement, and present more damage and greater mortality in the short term.

RESUMEN Objetivo: Analizar las características de los pacientes con lupus eritematoso sistêmico (LES) diagnosticados durante una hospitalización. Métodos: Análisis retrospectivo de historias clínicas. Se estudiaron dos grupos: a) LES diagnosticado durante la hospitalización (SLEin) y b) LES diagnosticado de forma ambulatoria (SLEout). Resultados: Se evaluaron 123 pacientes (87% mujeres); edad promedio al diagnóstico 34 arios; el 37% de ellos era SLEin. Los pacientes del grupo SLEin tuvieron una mediana de 144 días desde el inicio de los síntomas hasta el diagnóstico, vs. 287 días en SLEout (p = 0,04). Inicialmente, los pacientes SLEin tenían un SLEDAI promedio de 10, vs. 8 en SLEout (p = 0,004) y anti-dsDNA positivo en el 71%, vs. el 53% en SLEout (p = 0,07). A los 6 meses, la dosis acumulada de glucocorticoides (promedio) fue de 6.493 mg en SLEin vs. 3.563 mg en SLEout (p<0,001), y el uso de inmunosupresores fue mayor en SLEin: 62% vs. 26% en SLEout (p< 0,001). Al año se halló nefritis lúpica clase III o IV en el 31% de SLEin vs. el 12% en SLEout (Log Rank Test: p = 0,003). A los 2 años, 6 pacientes de SLEin murieron, vs. un paciente de SLEout (p = 0,02). Los pacientes con SLEin tuvieron más daño (índice de daño SLICC/ACR: mediana 0, rango 25-75%: 0-1, vs. mediana 0, rango 25-75%: 0-0 en SLEout; p = 0,04). Conclusiones: Los pacientes SLEin fueron inicialmente más activos, requirieron mayores dosis de glucocorticoides e inmunosupresores, tuvieron una afectación renal más significativa y presentaron más daño y mayor mortalidad a corto plazo.

Assessment of the Sources of Information by Patients With Rheumatic Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to ascertain the frequency of use, search intent (SI), level of accessibility, and degree of reliability of sources of information (SOIs) in rheumatology. METHODS: A survey among adult outpatients with rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, and spondyloarthritis was conducted. They were asked if they had procured information from 12 selected SOIs during the past year. Search intent was defined as the source they would like to consult. Accessibility and reliability were assessed through 0-to-10 scales (minimum and maximum, respectively). RESULTS: Four hundred two patients were surveyed. They had consulted a median of 3 SOIs (interquartile range, 2-6) but described a higher SI: median of 5 SOIs (interquartile range 3-8); p = 0.001.The most consulted SOIs were the physician (83%), other patients (45%), and Facebook (36%). The main differences between SI and the searches actually performed were observed in community lectures by health care professionals (49%), scientific societies (48%), and associations of patients (27%); p < 0.001. These 3 sources showed low level of accessibility. Facebook, press, radio, and YouTube were the least reliable sources. CONCLUSIONS: Patients consulted a median of 3 SOIs but reported a significantly higher SI. Although patients demand more information, the request is leveled at SOIs with difficult accessibility but high reliability.

Lung Ultrasound as a Screening Method for Interstitial Lung Disease in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) undergo chest radiographs and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the thorax both for interstitial lung disease (ILD) detection and for disease progression monitoring. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess whether lung ultrasound (LUS) is a useful screening tool for ILD in patients with SSc in comparison with HRCT. METHODS: This was a longitudinal cohort study carried out from December 2015 to April 2016. An LUS was performed to examine B-lines in 67 consecutive patients who met the 2013 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for SSc and had a previous HRCT. B-lines were quantified and classified according to the score modified from Picano. Severity and extent of lung involvement on the HRCT were determined by means of the Warrick score. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients had both abnormal HRCT (Warrick score >7) and abnormal LUS, 2 had a mild score (6-15 B-lines), and 27 had either moderate or severe scores (≥16 B-lines). Of the 38 patients with negative HRCT, 25 presented some degree of lung involvement on the LUS. Thus, LUS has a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 34%. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed the analytic relation between the number of B-lines and the presence of ILD on the HRCT (area under the curve, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Lung ultrasound may be a method to detect abnormal lung findings in a noninvasive manner in patients with SSc. Because of its high sensitivity, a low score almost rules out the need for an HRCT.

Rituximab in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to describe the efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) as a remission induction and maintenance therapy in ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). RECENT FINDINGS: A PubMed search was carried out to track down articles published between February 2006 and February 2016. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that encompassed patients with AAV were included. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2014-2015 online abstracts were also reviewed whether they were RTCs or not. Ten PubMed RCTs were analyzed along with eight ACR and four EULAR abstracts. RTX was not inferior to cyclophosphamide (CYC) for remission induction in AAV; it was superior to CYC in patients with relapsing disease and superior for remission maintenance in comparison with azathioprine (AZA). Rituximab is a therapeutic option to induce and maintain remission in patients with AAV.