Molecular Taxonomy of Myelodysplastic Syndromes and its Clinical Implications.

Myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) are clonal hematologic disorders characterized by morphologic abnormalities of myeloid cells and peripheral cytopenias. While genetic abnormalities underlie the pathogenesis of these disorders and their heterogeneity, current classifications of MDS rely predominantly on morphology. We performed genomic profiling of 3,233 patients with MDS or related disorders to delineate molecular subtypes and define their clinical implications. Gene mutations, copy-number alterations (CNAs), and copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (cnLOH) were derived from targeted sequencing of a 152-gene panel, with abnormalities identified in 91, 43, and 11% of patients, respectively. We characterized 16 molecular groups, encompassing 86% of patients, using information from 21 genes, 6 cytogenetic events, and LOH at the TP53 and TET2 loci. Two residual groups defined by negative findings (molecularly not-otherwise specified, absence of recurrent drivers) comprised 14% of patients. The groups varied in size from 0.5% to 14% of patients and were associated with distinct clinical phenotypes and outcomes. The median bone marrow blast percentage across groups ranged from 1.5 to 10%, and the median overall survival from 0.9 to 8.2 years. We validated 5 well-characterized entities, added further evidence to support 3 previously reported subsets, and described 8 novel groups. The prognostic influence of bone marrow blasts depended on the genetic subtypes. Within genetic subgroups, therapy-related MDS and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) had comparable clinical and outcome profiles to primary MDS. In conclusion, genetically-derived subgroups of MDS are clinically relevant and may inform future classification schemas and translational therapeutic research.

Performance of MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 break-apart FISH in small biopsies with large B-cell lymphoma: a retrospective Cytopathology Hematopathology Interinstitutional Consortium study.

Introduction: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is an essential ancillary study used to identify clinically aggressive subsets of large B-cell lymphomas that have MYC, BCL2, or BCL6 rearrangements. Small-volume biopsies such as fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and core needle biopsy (CNB) are increasingly used to diagnose lymphoma and obtain material for ancillary studies such as FISH. However, the performance of FISH in small biopsies has not been thoroughly evaluated or compared to surgical biopsies. Methods: We describe the results of MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 FISH in a series of 222 biopsy specimens, including FNAB with cell blocks, CNBs, and surgical excisional or incisional biopsies from 208 unique patients aggregated from 6 academic medical centers. A subset of patients had FNAB followed by a surgical biopsy (either CNB or excisional biopsy) obtained from the same or contiguous anatomic site as part of the same clinical workup; FISH results were compared for these paired specimens. Results: FISH had a low hybridization failure rate of around 1% across all specimen types. FISH identified concurrent MYC and BCL2 rearrangements in 20 of 197 (10%) specimens and concurrent MYC and BCL6 rearrangements in 3 of 182 (1.6%) specimens. The paired FNAB and surgical biopsy specimens did not show any discrepancies for MYC or BCL2 FISH; of the 17 patients with 34 paired cytology and surgical specimens, only 2 of the 49 FISH probes compared (4% of all comparisons) showed any discrepancy and both were at the BCL6 locus. One discrepancy was due to necrosis of the CNB specimen causing a false negative BCL6 FISH result when compared to the FNAB cell block that demonstrated a BCL6 rearrangement. Discussion: FISH showed a similar hybridization failure rate in all biopsy types. Ultimately, MYC, BCL2, or BCL6 FISH showed 96% concordance when compared across paired cytology and surgical specimens, suggesting FNAB with cell block is equivalent to other biopsy alternatives for evaluation of DLBCL or HGBCL FISH testing.

A comparative analysis of the clinical and genetic profiles of blast phase BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm and acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplasia-related.

INTRODUCTION: The classic Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (Ph (-) MPNs), have variable potential for progression to the blast phase (MPN-BP) of the disease. Except initiated by distinct driver mutations, MPN-BP frequently carry similar genetic abnormalities defining acute myeloid leukemia myelodysplasia-related (AML-MR). Because of dissimilar initial pathogenesis, MPN-BP and AML-MR are retained under different disease categories. To determine if separately classifying these entities is justified, we compare MPN-BP with AML-MR patients based on mutational landscape and clinical parameters. METHODS: 104 MPN-BP patients and 145 AML-MR patients were identified with available clinical, cytogenetic, and genetic data. RESULTS: AML-MR patients presented with a higher blast count (median, 51% vs. 30%) while MPN-BP patients had higher WBC counts, platelet counts and bone marrow cellularity (all p<0.0001). Patients with MPN-BP showed similar genetic mutations with similar mutation pattern (functional domain, hotspot and locus involved by the mutations) but a different mutation rate from AML-MR, with more frequent JAK2, CALR, MPL, ASXL1, IDH2, SETBP1 and SRSF2 mutations and less frequent TP53 and DNMT3A mutations. The overall survival (OS) of MPN-BP (OS post-BP-progression) is comparable to that of AML-MR (median OS, 9.5 months vs. 13.1 months, p=0.20). In addition, the subgroups of MPN-BP show similar OS as AML-MR. When harboring certain mutation such as TP53, ASXL1, DNMT3A, TET2, RUNX1, IDH1, IDH2, EZH2, U2AF1, BCOR and SRSF2, MPN-BP and AML-MR patients carrying the same somatic mutation show no difference in OS. CONCLUSION: MPN-BP and AML-MR harbor similar somatic mutations and clinical outcomes, suggesting a unified clinical disease entity.

Predictors of clinical outcome in myeloproliferative neoplasm, unclassifiable: A Bone Marrow Pathology Group study.

OBJECTIVES: Myeloproliferative neoplasm, unclassifiable (MPN-U, revised to MPN, not otherwise specified in the fifth edition of the World Health Organization classification) is a heterogeneous category of primary marrow disorders with clinical, morphologic, and/or molecular features that preclude classification as a more specific MPN subtype due to stage at diagnosis, overlapping features between MPN subtypes, or the presence of coexisting disorders. Compared with other MPN subtypes, the contribution of the mutational landscape in MPN-U in conjunction with other clinical and morphologic biomarkers to prognosis has been less well investigated. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective study of MPN-U (94 cases) to better define the clinicopathologic features, genetic landscape, and clinical outcomes, including subgroups of early-stage, advanced-stage, and coexisting disorders. The Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) plus scoring system was applied to assess its relevance to MPN-U prognosis. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis demonstrated bone marrow blast count and DIPSS plus score as statistically significant in predicting overall survival. Univariate analysis identified additional potential poor prognostic markers, including abnormal karyotype and absence of JAK2 mutation. Secondary mutations were frequent in the subset analyzed by next-generation sequencing (26/37 cases, 70.3%) with a borderline association between high molecular risk mutations and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: This study, as one of the largest of MPN-U studies incorporating both clinicopathologic and molecular data, moves toward identification of biomarkers that better predict prognosis in this heterogeneous category.

Molecular and clinical presentation of UBA1-mutated myelodysplastic syndromes.

Mutations in UBA1, which are disease-defining for VEXAS syndrome, have been reported in patients diagnosed with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Here, we define the prevalence and clinical associations of UBA1 mutations in a representative cohort of patients with MDS. Digital droplet PCR profiling of a selected cohort of 375 male patients lacking MDS disease-defining mutations or established WHO disease classification identified 28 patients (7%) with UBA1 p.M41T/V/L mutations. Using targeted sequencing of UBA1 in a representative MDS cohort (n=2,027), we identified an additional 27 variants in 26 patients (1%), which we classified as likely/pathogenic (n=12) and unknown significance (n=15). Among the total 40 patients with likely/pathogenic variants (2%), all were male and 63% were classified by WHO2016 as MDS-MLD/SLD. Patients had a median of one additional myeloid gene mutation, often in TET2 (n=12), DNMT3A (n=10), ASXL1 (n=3), or SF3B1 (n=3). Retrospective clinical review where possible showed that 83% (28/34) UBA1-mutant cases had VEXAS-associated diagnoses or inflammatory clinical presentation. The prevalence of UBA1-mutations in MDS patients argues for systematic screening for UBA1 in the management of MDS.

Follicular Lymphoma Presenting With Symptomatic Bone Involvement: A Clinicopathologic and Molecular Analysis of 16 Cases.

Primary bone lymphoma (PBL) is rare and mostly represented by diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL). Follicular lymphoma (FL), albeit commonly disseminating to the bone marrow, rarely presents primarily as bone lesions. Here, we studied 16 patients (12 men:4 women, median age 60 years) who presented with bone pain and/or skeletal radiologic abnormalities revealing bone FL. Lesions were multifocal in 11 patients (spine ± appendicular skeleton), and unifocal in 5 patients (femoral, tibial, or vertebral). An infiltrate of centrocytes and centroblasts (CD20+ CD5- CD10+ BCL2+ BCL6+) with abundant reactive T cells and an increased reticulin fibrosis massively replaced the marrow spaces between preserved bone trabeculae. The pattern was diffuse ± nodular, often with paratrabecular reinforcement and/or peripheral paratrabecular extension. Ki-67 was usually <15%. Two cases had necrosis. BCL2 rearrangement was demonstrated in 14 of 14 evaluable cases (with concomitant BCL6 rearrangement in one). High-throughput sequencing revealed BCL2, KMT2D, and TNFRSF14 to be the most frequently mutated genes. After staging, 5 qualified for PBL (3 limited stage) and 11 had stage IV systemic FL. All patients received rituximab ± polychemotherapy as firstline treatment, and 7 received local therapy (6 radiotherapy and 2 surgery). Three patients experienced transformation to DLBCL. At the last follow-up (15/16, median 48 months), 11 patients achieved complete remission, including all cases with PBL and most patients with limited extraosseous disease (3-year progression-free survival 71%). One patient died of unrelated cause (3-year overall survival 91%). FL may manifest as a localized or polyostotic bone disease. A minority represent PBL, whereas most reveal systemic disease.

Cutaneous Manifestations of Myeloid Neoplasms Exhibit Broad and Divergent Morphologic and Immunophenotypic Features but Share Ancestral Clonal Mutations With Bone Marrow.

In this study, we performed a comprehensive molecular analysis of paired skin and peripheral blood/bone marrow (BM) samples from 17 patients with cutaneous myeloid or cutaneous histiocytic-dendritic neoplasms. The cutaneous manifestations included 10 patients with cutaneous acute myeloid leukemia (c-AML), 2 patients with full or partial Langerhans cell differentiation, 2 patients with blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasms (BPDCN), 1 patient with both Langerhans cell differentiation and BPDCN, and 2 patients with full or partial indeterminate dendritic cell differentiation. Seven of the 10 c-AML patients (70%) exhibited concurrent or subsequent marrow involvement by acute myeloid leukemia, with all 7 cases (100%) demonstrating shared clonal mutations in both the skin and BM. However, clonal relatedness was documented in one additional case that never had any BM involvement. Nevertheless, NPM1 mutations were identified in 7 of the 10 (70%) of these c-AML cases while one had KMT2A rearrangement and one showed inv(16). All 3 patients (100%) with Langerhans cell neoplasms, 2 patients with BPDCN (100%), and one of the 2 patients (50%) with other cutaneous dendritic cell neoplasms also demonstrated shared mutations between the skin and concurrent or subsequent myeloid neoplasms. Both BM and c-AML shared identical founding drivers, with a predominance of NPM1, DNMT3A, and translocations associated with monocytic differentiation, with common cutaneous-only mutations involving genes in the signal transduction and epigenetic pathways. Cutaneous histiocytic-dendritic neoplasms shared founding drivers in ASXL1, TET2, and/or SRSF2. However, in the Langerhans cell histiocytosis or histiocytic sarcoma cases, there exist recurrent secondary RAS pathway hits, whereas cutaneous BPDCN cases exhibit copy number or structural variants. These results enrich and broaden our understanding of clonally related cutaneous manifestations of myeloid neoplasms and further illuminate the highly diverse spectrum of morphologic and immunophenotypic features they exhibit.

STAT5B mutations in myeloid neoplasms differ by disease subtypes but characterize a subset of chronic myeloid neoplasms with eosinophilia and/or basophilia.

STAT5B has been reported as a recurrent mutation in myeloid neoplasms (MNs) with eosinophilia, but the overall frequency and importance across a spectrum of MNs are largely unknown. We conducted a multicenter study on a series of 82 MNs with STAT5B mutations detected by next-generation sequencing. The estimated frequency of STAT5B mutation in MNs was low.

Morphologic Characteristics of Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

Morphologic characterization remains a cornerstone in the diagnosis and classification of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in the updated International Consensus Classification (ICC) and 5th edition World Health Organization Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms (Arber, Orazi, & Hasserjian, 2022; Khoury & Solary, 2022). The presence of dysplasia is one of the key diagnostic criteria required for establishing a diagnosis of MDS, and the percentage of myeloblasts in the blood and bone marrow impacts both disease classification and prognostication. Morphologic features also aid in distinguishing MDS from a myriad of other myeloid neoplasms and non-neoplastic mimics. Additional key morphologic features that should be recorded in any MDS case are the bone marrow cellularity and the degree of reticulin fibrosis. In this review, the morphologic assessment of the bone marrow biopsy, bone marrow aspirate, and peripheral blood smear as it pertains to the diagnosis and up-to-date classification of MDS will be described. The implications of the findings on classification and prognosis will also be discussed.

Classification, risk stratification and response assessment in myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS): A state-of-the-art report on behalf of the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS).

The guidelines for classification, prognostication, and response assessment of myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) have all recently been updated. In this report on behalf of the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS) we summarize these developments. We first critically examine the updated World Health Organization (WHO) classification and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of MDS. We then compare traditional and molecularly based risk MDS risk assessment tools. Lastly, we discuss limitations of criteria in measuring therapeutic benefit and highlight how the International Working Group (IWG) 2018 and 2023 response criteria addressed these deficiencies and are endorsed by the icMDS. We also address the importance of patient centered care by discussing the value of quality-of-life assessment. We hope that the reader of this review will have a better understanding of how to classify MDS, predict clinical outcomes and evaluate therapeutic outcomes.

Diagnosis and classification of myelodysplastic syndromes.

ABSTRACT: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) are neoplastic myeloid proliferations characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis resulting in peripheral blood cytopenias. MDS is distinguished from nonneoplastic clonal myeloid proliferations by the presence of morphologic dysplasia and from acute myeloid leukemia by a blast threshold of 20%. The diagnosis of MDS can be challenging because of the myriad other causes of cytopenias: accurate diagnosis requires the integration of clinical features with bone marrow and peripheral blood morphology, immunophenotyping, and genetic testing. MDS has historically been subdivided into several subtypes by classification schemes, the most recent of which are the International Consensus Classification and World Health Organization Classification (fifth edition), both published in 2022. The aim of MDS classification is to identify entities with shared genetic underpinnings and molecular pathogenesis, and the specific subtype can inform clinical decision-making alongside prognostic risk categorization. The current MDS classification schemes incorporate morphologic features (bone marrow and blood blast percentage, degree of dysplasia, ring sideroblasts, bone marrow fibrosis, and bone marrow hypocellularity) and also recognize 3 entities defined by genetics: isolated del(5q) cytogenetic abnormality, SF3B1 mutation, and TP53 mutation. It is anticipated that with advancing understanding of the genetic basis of MDS pathogenesis, future MDS classification will be based increasingly on genetic classes. Nevertheless, morphologic features in MDS reflect the phenotypic expression of the underlying abnormal genetic pathways and will undoubtedly retain importance to inform prognosis and guide treatment.

Presence but not number of secondary type mutations influences outcome in de novo AML without MDS-associated or recurring cytogenetic abnormalities.

A group of gene mutations has been identified to be strongly associated with secondary acute myeloid leukemias (AML) arising from prior myeloid neoplasms. The International Consensus Classification (ICC) and proposed 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification differ by inclusion of RUNX1. A recent study suggested that having two or more secondary mutations is associated with a particularly poor prognosis. In a study of 294 de novo AML patients, we found that patients with at least one ICC-defined secondary mutation had shorter survival when compared to those without secondary mutations, and ICC/WHO groups of two or more mutations did not predict for worse outcomes.

Prognostic impact of secondary versus de novo ontogeny in acute myeloid leukemia is accounted for by the European LeukemiaNet 2022 risk classification.

Secondary AML (sAML), defined by either history of antecedent hematologic disease (AHD) or prior genotoxic therapy (tAML), is classically regarded as having worse prognosis than de novo disease (dnAML). Clinicians may infer a new AML diagnosis is secondary based on a history of antecedent blood count (ABC) abnormalities in the absence of known prior AHD, but whether abnormal ABCs are associated with worse outcomes is unclear. Secondary-type mutations have recently been incorporated into the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2022 guidelines as adverse-risk features, raising the question of whether clinical descriptors of ontogeny (i.e., de novo or secondary) are prognostically significant when accounting for genetic risk by ELN 2022. In a large multicenter cohort of patients (n = 734), we found that abnormal ABCs are not independently prognostic after adjusting for genetic characteristics in dnAML patients. Furthermore, history of AHD and tAML do not confer increased risk of death compared to dnAML on multivariate analysis, suggesting the prognostic impact of ontogeny is accounted for by disease genetics as stratified by ELN 2022 risk and TP53 mutation status. These findings emphasize the importance that disease genetics should play in risk stratification and clinical trial eligibility in AML.

The international consensus classification of eosinophilic disorders and systemic mastocytosis.

Based on new data and increased understanding of disease molecular genetics, the international consensus classification (ICC) has made several changes in the diagnosis and classification of eosinophilic disorders and systemic mastocytosis. Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia (M/LN-eo) and gene rearrangements have been renamed as M/LN-eo with tyrosine kinase gene fusions (M/LN-eo-TK). The category has been expanded to include ETV6::ABL1 and FLT3 fusions, and to accept PCM1::JAK2 and its genetic variants as formal members. The overlaps and differences between M/LN-eo-TK and BCR::ABL1-like B-lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)/de novo T-ALL sharing the same genetic lesions are addressed. Besides genetics, ICC for the first time has introduced bone marrow morphologic criteria in distinguishing idiopathic hypereosinophilia/hypereosinophilic syndrome from chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified. The major diagnostic criteria for systemic mastocytosis (SM) in the ICC remain largely based on morphology, but several minor modifications/refinements have been made in criteria related to diagnosis, subclassification, and assessment of disease burden (B- and C-findings). This review is to focus on the ICC updates related to these disease entities, illustrated through changes related to morphology, molecular genetics, clinical features, prognosis, and treatment. Two practical algorithms are provided in navigating through the diagnosis and classification systems of hypereosinophilia and SM.

Guide to the Diagnosis of Myeloid Neoplasms: A Bone Marrow Pathology Group Approach.

OBJECTIVES: The practicing pathologist is challenged by the ever-increasing diagnostic complexity of myeloid neoplasms. This guide is intended to provide a general roadmap from initial case detection, often triggered by complete blood count results with subsequent blood smear review, to final diagnosis. METHODS: The integration of hematologic, morphologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic features into routine practice is standard of care. The requirement for molecular genetic testing has increased along with the complexity of test types, the utility of different testing modalities in identifying key gene mutations, and the sensitivity and turnaround time for various assays. RESULTS: Classification systems for myeloid neoplasms have evolved to achieve the goal of providing a pathology diagnosis that enhances patient care, outcome prediction, and treatment options for individual patients and is formulated, endorsed, and adopted by hematologists/oncologists. CONCLUSIONS: This guide provides diagnostic strategies for all myeloid neoplasm subtypes. Special considerations are provided for each category of testing and neoplasm category, along with classification information, genetic testing requirements, interpretation information, and case reporting recommendations based on the experience of 11 Bone Marrow Pathology Group members.

Safety and efficacy of zinpentraxin alfa as monotherapy or in combination with ruxolitinib in myelofibrosis: stage I of a phase II trial.

Pentraxin 2 (PTX-2; serum amyloid P component), a circulating endogenous regulator of the inflammatory response to tissue injury and fibrosis, is reduced in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Zinpentraxin alfa (RO7490677, PRM-151) is a recombinant form of PTX-2 that has shown preclinical antifibrotic activity and no dose-limiting toxicities in phase I trials. We report results from stage 1 of a phase II trial of zinpentraxin alfa in patients with intermediate-1/2 or high-risk MF. Patients (n=27) received intravenous zinpentraxin α weekly (QW) or every 4 weeks (Q4W), as monotherapy or an additional therapy for patients on stable-dose ruxolitinib. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR; investigatorassessed) adapted from International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment criteria. Secondary endpoints included modified Myeloproliferative Neoplasm-Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score (MPN-SAF TSS) change, bone marrow (BM) MF grade reduction, pharmacokinetics, and safety. ORR at week 24 was 33% (n=9/27) and varied across individual cohorts (QW: 38% [3/8]; Q4W: 14% [1/7]; QW+ruxolitinib: 33% [2/6]; Q4W+ruxolitinib: 50% [3/6]). Five of 18 evaluable patients (28%) experienced a ≥50% reduction in MPN-SAF TSS, and six of 17 evaluable patients (35%) had a ≥1 grade improvement from baseline in BM fibrosis at week 24. Most treatment-emergent adverse events (AE) were grade 1-2, most commonly fatigue. Among others, anemia and thrombocytopenia were infrequent (n=3 and n=1, respectively). Treatment-related serious AE occurred in four patients (15%). Overall, zinpentraxin alfa showed evidence of clinical activity and tolerable safety as monotherapy and in combination with ruxolitinib in this open-label, non-randomized trial (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT01981850).