Robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery associated tympanic membrane perforation: A report of two cases and review of the literature.

Robotic gynecologic surgery is associated with the use of steep Trendelenburg positioning. Steep Trendelenburg is necessary to provide optimal exposure to the pelvis but is associated with an increased risk of non-surgical complications such as suboptimal ventilation, facial and laryngeal edema, increased intraocular and intracranial pressure as well as neurologic injury. Several case reports have described otorrhagia after robotic assisted surgery; however, there are limited reports on the risk of tympanic membrane perforation. To our knowledge, there are no published reports on tympanic membrane perforation in gynecologic nor gynecologic oncology surgery. We report two cases of perioperative tympanic membrane rupture and bloody otorrhagia associated with robot-assisted gynecologic surgery. In both cases otolaryngology/Ear Nose and Throat (ENT) was consulted, and the perforations resolved with conservative management.

Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Emergency Department Visits After Outpatient Gynecologic Surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify the prevalence of and risk factors for emergency department (ED) visits within 30 days of outpatient gynecologic surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary academic medical institution. PATIENTS: Adult patients who underwent outpatient surgery (≤1 midnight in the hospital) between January 2018 and September 2019 (N = 2373). INTERVENTIONS: Scheduled outpatient gynecologic surgery for a benign indication. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 109 patients (5%) visited the ED within 30 days of surgery. Patients who visited the ED were significantly younger (median age 37 years vs 42 years, p = .02) and had a higher prevalence of abdominal surgical history (67% vs 56%, p = .02) and cardiopulmonary comorbidities (53% vs 40%, p = .007). They were more likely to have undergone a hysterectomy (26% vs 20%) and less likely to have undergone prolapse surgery (4% vs 12%, p = .05). Pain related to the surgical site (42% of ED visits), nausea and/or vomiting (14%), and fever (12%) were the most common surgery-related reasons for ED visits. Medical issues not directly related to surgery accounted for 31% of ED visits. A total of 36% of ED visits resulted in admission. When adjusted for age, insurance status, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, chronic pain and cardiopulmonary comorbidities, abdominal surgical history, primary procedure performed, and surgical route, the following factors were associated with significantly increased risk of visiting the ED: decreasing age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-1.3, p <.001), history of abdominal surgery (aOR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.6, p = .017), cardiopulmonary comorbidities (aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.0, p = .003), undergoing hysterectomy (aOR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-3.8, p = .032), and a vulvovaginal surgical route as opposed to abdominal surgical route (aOR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2-5.1, p = .015). CONCLUSION: ED visits after outpatient gynecologic surgery were uncommon, although approximately one-third of visits resulted in admission. Strategies that target our identified risk factors of younger patient age and cardiopulmonary comorbidities may help reduce the ED burden generated by patients undergoing gynecologic surgery.

Post-ablation tubal sterilization syndrome: Does route of sterilization matter?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence of clinical post-ablation tubal sterilization syndrome among women who underwent abdominal (i.e., peripartum or laparoscopic) vs hysteroscopic permanent contraception in addition to endometrial ablation. STUDY DESIGN: This study was a retrospective cohort study conducted at an academic medical center. We included women (N = 188) who successfully underwent both endometrial ablation and permanent contraception between 2005 and 2017. Forty-one women underwent hysteroscopic permanent contraception and 147 underwent abdominal (i.e., peripartum or laparoscopic) permanent contraception. The primary outcome was the prevalence of clinical post-ablation tubal sterilization syndrome, as defined by new or worsening cyclic pelvic pain after completion of both procedures. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of the syndrome was 19.1% (34 of 178 women who followed up), with no detected difference between those who underwent hysteroscopic (6 of 38, 15.8%) vs abdominal permanent contraception (28 of 140, 20.0%, p = 0.55). In multivariate regression modeling, when adjusted for race, parity, gynecologic pathologies, hormonal medication use, and the presence of baseline pain (both pelvic and non-pelvic) only younger patient age was marginally associated with increased odds of the syndrome (aOR 1.85, 95% CI 1.01- 3.45, p = 0.05), while abdominal as compared to hysteroscopic permanent contraception was not (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 0.59-2.84, p = 0.53). Of the 28 patients with clinical post-ablation tubal sterilization syndrome who underwent hysterectomy and/or salpingectomy as treatment for their pain, none showed signs of hematosalpinx or hematometra at the time of surgery or on final pathology. CONCLUSION: We did not find evidence that route of permanent contraception affects the risk of post-ablation tubal sterilization syndrome development. Younger patients may be at higher risk of this syndrome.

Management of nonparasitic splenic cysts in children.

BACKGROUND: The management of nonparasitic splenic cysts in children is unclear. Options include observation, cystectomy, partial or total splenectomy and percutaneous aspiration with and without sclerotherapy. The aim of this study is to assess the outcomes of these interventions at a children's hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of patients aged <18 y with splenic cysts over 7 y was performed. Demographics, mode of intervention, and outcome data were collected. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were identified and their initial management was as follows: 32 patients were observed and 10 underwent intervention (four aspiration and sclerotherapy and six resection). Age (y) was higher for intervention patients than observation patients (P = 0.004), as was the cyst size (P < 0.001). Incidental finding was the most common presentation in observation patients (n = 30; 94%) and abdominal pain for intervention groups: aspiration and sclerotherapy (n = 3; 75%) and resection (n = 5; 83%). Two patients failed observation and required aspiration and sclerotherapy due to persistence of symptoms or size increase. Median number of aspiration with and without sclerotherapy interventions was three (range 1-5). All six patients had persistence, with two requiring surgical resection due to symptomatic persistence. Surgical procedures included laparoscopic cystectomy (n = 3), laparoscopic partial (n = 2) or complete splenectomy (n = 1), and/or open splenectomy (n = 2). One laparoscopic cystectomy patient had persistence but the other two had no follow-up imaging. Partial and total splenectomy patients had no recurrence and/or persistence. CONCLUSIONS: Observation is an appropriate management strategy for small asymptomatic splenic cysts. Aspiration with and without sclerotherapy and laparoscopic cystectomy are associated with higher rates of recurrence; thus, partial splenectomy may provide the best balance of recurrence and spleen preservation.