Growth outcomes in Hirschsprung disease patients following pull-through.

INTRODUCTION: Despite various definitive methods that are used for treating Hirschsprung's disease (HSCR), there are few studies comparing the effect of different pull-through methods on the growth outcomes of patients. We aimed to compare the effect of three different pull-through methods, namely Duhamel, Soave and transanal endorectal pullthrough (TEPT), on HSCR growth outcomes of patients. METHODS: Medical records of all HSCR patients who underwent pull-through at the Dr. Sardjito Hospital, Indonesia between January 2010 and August 2016 were reviewed for their growth outcomes before and after the surgery. RESULTS: We included 64 HSCR patients, 45 males and 19 females, of which 14, 17, and 33 patients underwent Duhamel, Soave, and TEPT respectively. There were no nutritional status differences in HSCR patients after Duhamel, Soave, and TEPT surgery (p=0.07, 0.17, and 0.79, respectively). Z-score average of weight-for-age did not differ between three surgical methods (p=0.77 and 0.15 for preoperative and postoperative, respectively). In addition, the improvement of nutritional status was achieved in 21.2% HSCR patients after TEPT, 14.3% post Duhamel and 5.9% following Soave procedure, but these differences did not reach a significant level (p=0.34). DISCUSSION: Our study shows no difference in effect on the growth outcomes in HSCR patients following Duhamel, Soave and TEPT procedure. Further study with a larger sample size is important to give valuable long-term growth outcomes for HSCR patients after pull-through.

Proposal of new body composition prediction equations from bioelectrical impedance for Indonesian men.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is one of the most affordable and feasible body composition assessment techniques for clinical and field settings. However, it is important to use an equation appropriate for the study population. This study aimed to propose and validate prediction equations to estimate body composition using BIA for Indonesian men. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Total body water (TBW), fat-free mass (FFM) and fat mass (FM) were determined using the deuterium dilution technique in 292 Indonesian males. Participants were divided equally into development and validation groups to develop prediction equations and to cross-validate the proposed prediction equations, respectively. In addition, selected prediction equations using BIA were cross-validated. RESULTS: The proposed BIA equations were valid in our cross-validation samples. The best performance equations obtained from the absolute measure of body composition (TBW, FFM and FM) showed that r ranged between 0.89 and 0.91 and standard error of the estimate=1.8-2.6 kg. Cross-validation analysis indicated that the proposed equations had a bias of 0.1-0.3 kg, pure error of 1.3-1.8 kg and limits of agreement (mean difference±1.96 s.d.) of -0.26 to 0.13±4.09 to 5.59 kg. Among existing prediction equations examined, those by Deurenberg et al. (1989) and Lukaski et al. (1987) significantly overestimated FM by 4.0 and 3.2 kg, respectively, whereas the equation by Deurenberg et al. (1991) significantly (P<0.001) underestimated FFM by 5.0 kg compared with the reference FFM. CONCLUSIONS: The new BIA prediction equations may provide more precise and accurate estimation of body composition in Indonesian men than the existing equations.