Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Public Health ; 6: 151, 2006 Jun 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16768792

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Commission on Health Research for Development concluded that "for the most vulnerable people, the benefits of research offer a potential for change that has gone largely untapped." This project was designed to assess low and middle income country capacity and commitment for equity-oriented research. METHODS: A multi-disciplinary team with coordinators from each of four regions (Asia, Latin America, Africa and Central and Eastern Europe) developed a questionnaire through consensus meetings using a mini-Delphi technique. Indicators were selected based on their quality, validity, comprehensiveness, feasibility and relevance to equity. Indicators represented five categories that form the Health Research Profile (HRP): 1) Research priorities; 2) Resources (amount spent on research); 3) Production of knowledge (capacity); 4) Packaging of knowledge and 5) Evidence of research impact on policy and equity. We surveyed three countries from each region. RESULTS: Most countries reported explicit national health research priorities. Of these, half included specific research priorities to address inequities in health. Data on financing were lacking for most countries due to inadequate centralized collection of this information. The five main components of HRP showed a gradient where countries scoring lower on the Human Development Index (HDI) had a lower capacity to conduct research to meet local health research needs. Packaging such as peer-reviewed journals and policy forums were reported by two thirds of the countries. Seven out of 12 countries demonstrated impact of health research on policies and reported engagement of stakeholders in this process. CONCLUSION: Only one out of 12 countries indicated there was research on all fronts of the equity debate. Knowledge sharing and management is needed to strengthen within-country capacity for research and implementation to reduce inequities in health. We recommend that all countries (and external agencies) should invest more in building a certain minimum level of national capacity for equity-oriented research.


Subject(s)
Developing Countries , Evidence-Based Medicine , Health Services Research , Vulnerable Populations , Africa , Asia , Consensus , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Delphi Technique , Europe, Eastern , Health Policy , Health Priorities , Humans , Latin America , Social Justice , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 11(4): 650-62, 1995.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8567197

ABSTRACT

Recent health reports, including the 1993 World Development Report, have emphasized the importance of integrating the needs of the population into technology assessment. This paper reviews previous approaches to technology assessment and identifies the missing link between technology and its impact on the physical, emotional, and social needs of the community, namely needs-based technology assessment. It stresses the key role played by issues of equity and community values in making technology decisions. A number of models for needs-based technology assessment are described.


Subject(s)
Community Health Planning , Health Services Needs and Demand , Models, Theoretical , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/methods , Cost of Illness , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Making, Organizational , Global Health , Health Policy , Humans , Organizational Innovation , Organizational Objectives , Social Justice , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...