Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 68
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29542844

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Non-coeliac gluten-sensitivity (NCGS) has been proposed as a new entity with unknown prevalence and mechanisms, and there is a need for a standardized procedure to confirm the diagnosis. The objective of this study was to characterize the response to an oral gluten-challenge in patients with a symptom-relief when following a gluten free-diet (GFD). METHODS: Twenty patients (14F/6M, age range: 21-62 years) with suspected NCGS, without coeliac disease and wheat-allergy, were included while on a gluten-free diet. All patients went through four periods of double-blinded provocation, two with gluten and two with placebo in randomized order. They consumed two muffins a day (11/0 g gluten) for 4 days, followed by a 3-day wash-out. Gastrointestinal symptoms were recorded with questionnaires at baseline and after each provocation. We also investigated whether patients were able to correctly identify periods with gluten-exposure. KEY RESULTS: Collectively the whole group reported the most severe symptoms after placebo (P = .012). Four out of twenty patients correctly identified the two periods when they received gluten, hence were diagnosed with NCGS. The diagnosed-group tended to show higher symptom scores than the not-diagnosed group both at baseline, after gluten exposure and after placebo, but no clear difference was seen between provocation with gluten and placebo. The not-diagnosed group showed more severe symptoms with placebo than with gluten (P = .029). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: The present study showed that the majority of patients with suspected NCGS are not able to identify when challenged with gluten in a double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge, indicating that gluten is not the cause of their symptoms.

2.
Neurogastroenterol Motil ; 30(4): e13252, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29144018

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In achalasia, muscle spasm may involve the proximal esophagus. When the muscle spasm is located in the proximal esophagus, conventional per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) may not be sufficient to relieve symptoms. In this paper, we describe retrograde endoscopic myotomy (REM) as a novel approach to perform myotomy of the proximal esophagus, with the application of a navigation tool for anatomical guidance during REM. We aim to evaluate the feasibility and safety of REM and usefulness of the navigation during REM. METHOD: A 42-year-old male with type III achalasia who was treated with laparoscopic myotomy with fundoplication, multiple pneumatic balloon dilations, Botox injections and anterior POEM of the middle and distal esophagus without symptomatic effect. Repeated high-resolution- manometry (HRM) revealed occluding contractions of high amplitude around and above the aortic arch. A probe-based real-time electromagnetic navigation platform was used to facilitate real-time anatomical orientation and to evaluate myotomy position and length during REM. RESULTS: The navigation system aided in identifying the major structures of the mediastinum, and position and length of the myotomy. Twelve weeks after REM, the Eckardt score fell from seven at baseline seven to two. We also observed improvement with reduction of the pressure at the level of previous spasms in the proximal esophagus from 124 mmHg to 8 mmHg on HRM. CONCLUSION: REM makes the proximal esophagus accessible for endoscopic myotomy. Potential indication for REM is motility disorders in the proximal esophagus and therapy failure after POEM.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Achalasia/surgery , Esophagoscopy/methods , Myotomy/methods , Adult , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Male , Treatment Outcome
3.
Neurogastroenterol Motil ; 30(4): e13249, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29119636

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gastric accommodation to a meal may be important in the pathogenesis of upper gastrointestinal disorders, but has been difficult to investigate in a minimally invasive fashion. METHODS: We studied gastric and lower esophageal physiology during food intake, combining transabdominal ultrasound, multichannel high-resolution impedance-manometry (HRIM) and a symptom questionnaire. A HRIM catheter was distally positioned at incisura angularis and 300 mL saline with 75 g glucose was ingested. Target variables were recorded for 30 min after fluid intake. KEY RESULTS: Fifteen healthy subjects' participated (11W/4M, median age 23.8 y) and all accepted the meal with few symptoms. At incisura angularis maximum change in pressure from pre-intake values was -7.4 mmHg after 60 s (P < .0001), rising to pre-intake values within 20 min. The corresponding area increased significantly from pre-intake values of 8.0 cm2 to 14.1 cm2 shortly after intake (P = .0012), peaked at 5 min and slowly decreased towards 30 min. The corresponding maximum change in stress from pre-intake pressure values was -59.2 mmHg shortly after (P < .0001), reaching pre-intake values within 20 min. Strain rose from 0 shortly before to 0.36 shortly after (P < .0001), peaking at 5 min. At incisura angularis, fullness was positively correlated with area and to strain, while fullness, area, and stress were negatively correlated with pressure. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The multimodal method enabled assessment of the gastric accommodation reflex, stress and strain in the stomach. It triggered few symptoms in healthy volunteers. We propose it to be a more physiological replacement of the barostat technique.


Subject(s)
Eating , Esophagus/physiology , Stomach/physiology , Adult , Esophagus/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Male , Manometry , Postprandial Period , Stomach/diagnostic imaging , Surveys and Questionnaires , Ultrasonography , Young Adult
5.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 45(10): 1339-1349, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28326569

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors and laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (LARS) offer long-term symptom control to patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). AIM: To evaluate the process of 'normalisation' of the squamous epithelium morphology of the distal oesophagus on these therapies. METHODS: In the LOTUS trial, 554 patients with chronic GERD were randomised to receive either esomeprazole (20-40 mg daily) or LARS. After 5 years, 372 patients remained in the study (esomeprazole, 192; LARS, 180). Biopsies were taken at the Z-line and 2 cm above, at baseline, 1, 3 and 5 years. A severity score was calculated based on: papillae elongation, basal cell hyperplasia, intercellular space dilatations and eosinophilic infiltration. The epithelial proliferative activity was assessed by Ki-67 immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: A gradual improvement in all variables over 5 years was noted in both groups, at both the Z-line and 2 cm above. The severity score decreased from baseline at each subsequent time point in both groups (P < 0.001, all comparisons), attaining a normal level by 5 years. Corresponding decreases in Ki-67 expression were observed (P < 0.001, all comparisons). No significant differences were found between esomeprazole treatment and LARS. Neither baseline severity score nor Ki-67 expression predicted the risk of treatment failure. CONCLUSIONS: Five years of treatment is generally required before squamous epithelial cell morphology and proliferation are 'normalised' in patients with chronic GERD, despite endoscopic and symptomatic disease control. Control of the acid component of the refluxate seems to play the predominant role in restoring tissue morphology.


Subject(s)
Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Mucous Membrane/physiopathology , Wound Healing , Adult , Biopsy , Esomeprazole/therapeutic use , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/physiopathology , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Mucous Membrane/drug effects , Mucous Membrane/pathology , Mucous Membrane/surgery , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Wound Healing/drug effects
6.
Rhinology ; 55(1): 27-33, 2017 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28214352

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The pathophysiology of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is unclear. It has been discussed for decades whether gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) may be a contributing factor for some patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the level of GOR in an unselected group of patients with CRS using multichannel impedance-pH monitoring. METHODS: Consecutive patients with CRS diagnosed using the EPOS2012 criteria, completed questionnaires on GOR symptoms and were offered 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII)-pH monitoring. The results were compared with a group of healthy controls. RESULTS: Forty-six patients completed MII-pH-monitoring and were compared with 45 control subjects, with comparable age and gender distributions. The median number of reflux episodes in the patients was 56.5 compared with 33 in controls, while, the numbers of proximal reflux episodes was 27.5 versus 3, respectively. Thirty nine patients had abnormal pH-impedance recordings compared with five controls. CONCLUSION: The CRS patients had significantly higher incidences of gastro-oesophageal reflux compared with asymptomatic controls. The results of this study suggest that GOR may be a causative or contributing factor of CRS.


Subject(s)
Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Rhinitis/complications , Rhinitis/physiopathology , Sinusitis/complications , Sinusitis/physiopathology , Body Mass Index , Case-Control Studies , Chronic Disease , Electric Impedance , Female , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Rhinitis/etiology , Sinusitis/etiology
7.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27747984

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A diet low in fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs) is increasingly recommended for patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We aimed to investigate the effects of a blinded low-FODMAP vs high-fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) diet on symptoms, immune activation, gut microbiota composition, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). METHODS: Twenty patients with diarrhea-predominant or mixed IBS were instructed to follow a low-FODMAP diet (LFD) throughout a 9-week study period. After 3 weeks, they were randomized and double-blindly assigned to receive a supplement of either FOS (FODMAP) or maltodextrin (placebo) for the next 10 days, followed by a 3-week washout period before crossover. Irritable bowel syndrome severity scoring system (IBS-SSS) was used to evaluate symptoms. Cytokines (interleukin [IL]-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor alpha) were analyzed in blood samples, and gut microbiota composition (16S rRNA) and SCFAs were analyzed in fecal samples. KEY RESULTS: Irritable bowel syndrome symptoms consistently improved after 3 weeks of LFD, and significantly more participants reported symptom relief in response to placebo (80%) than FOS (30%). Serum levels of proinflammatory IL-6 and IL-8, as well as levels of fecal bacteria (Actinobacteria, Bifidobacterium, and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii), total SCFAs, and n-butyric acid, decreased significantly on the LFD as compared to baseline. Ten days of FOS supplementation increased the level of these bacteria, whereas levels of cytokines and SCFAs remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Our findings support the efficacy of a LFD in alleviating IBS symptoms, and show changes in inflammatory cytokines, microbiota profile, and SCFAs, which may have consequences for gut health.


Subject(s)
Cytokines/blood , Dietary Carbohydrates/administration & dosage , Feces , Fermented Foods , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/blood , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diet therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Cellular Microenvironment/drug effects , Cellular Microenvironment/physiology , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Fatty Acids, Volatile/administration & dosage , Feces/microbiology , Female , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Oligosaccharides/administration & dosage , Young Adult
8.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 41(11): 1162-74, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25858519

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Control of chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease may be achieved either by anti-reflux surgery (ARS) or by long-term medical therapy with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). The primary efficacy results of the SOPRAN study, comparing long-term omeprazole use with open ARS, and the LOTUS study, comparing long-term esomeprazole use with laparoscopic ARS, have been reported. A secondary objective of these studies was to address the long-term safety of these respective therapeutic strategies and thereby provide a valid scientific platform for assessing long-term PPI safety. AIM: To assess the safety of long-term PPI therapy with omeprazole and esomeprazole through analyses of data from the randomised SOPRAN and LOTUS studies. METHODS: Safety data were collected from patients during the 12-year period of the SOPRAN study (n = 298) and the 5-year period of the LOTUS study (n = 514). Reported serious adverse events (SAEs) and changes in laboratory variables were analysed. RESULTS: Across both studies, SAEs were reported at a similar frequency in the PPI and ARS treatment groups. Taking the time frames into consideration, the number of fatal SAEs in the two studies was low in both treatment groups. Laboratory results, including routine haematology and tests for liver enzymes, electrolytes, vitamin D, vitamin B12 , folate and homocysteine, showed no clinically relevant changes over time. As expected, gastrin and chromogranin A were elevated in the PPI groups, with the greatest increases observed in the first year. CONCLUSION: No major safety concerns arose during 5-12 years of continuous PPI therapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00251927 and NCT00256737).


Subject(s)
Esomeprazole/adverse effects , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Omeprazole/adverse effects , Proton Pump Inhibitors/adverse effects , Aged , Chromogranin A/metabolism , Esomeprazole/therapeutic use , Female , Gastrins/metabolism , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Omeprazole/therapeutic use , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Young Adult
9.
Neurogastroenterol Motil ; 25(11): e718-27, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23965033

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Functional chest pain (FCP) of presumed esophageal origin is considered a common cause for chest pain in which central nervous system hyperexcitability is thought to play an important role. We aimed to compare cerebral responses with painful esophageal stimuli between FCP patients and healthy subjects (HS). METHODS: Thirteen patients with FCP (seven females, mean age 50.4 ± 7.5 years) and 15 HS (eight females, mean age 49.1 ± 12.9 years) were enrolled. Inclusion criteria consisted of typical chest pain, normal coronary angiogram, and normal upper gastrointestinal evaluation. Electrical stimulations evoking the pain threshold were applied in the distal esophagus, while cortical evoked potentials were recorded from the scalp. Pain scores, resting electroencephalogram (EEG), evoked potential characteristics and brain electrical sources to pain stimulation were compared between groups. KEY RESULTS: No differences were seen between patients and HS regarding (i) pain thresholds (patients: 20.1 ± 7.4 mA vs HS: 22.4 ± 8.3 mA, all P > 0.05), (ii) resting-EEG (P > 0.05), (iii) evoked brain potential latencies (N2: patients 181.7 ± 25.7 mS vs HS 182.2 ± 25.8 mS, all P > 0.05) and amplitudes (N2P2: patients 8.2 ± 7.2 µV vs HS: 10.1 ± 3.4 µV, all P > 0.05), (iv) topography (P > 0.05), and (v) brain source location (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: No differences in activation of brain areas to painful esophageal stimulation were seen in this group of well characterized patients with FCP compared with sex- and age-matched HS. The mechanism of pain in FCP and whether it originates in the esophagus remains unsolved.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Cortex/physiopathology , Chest Pain/physiopathology , Esophagus/physiopathology , Electric Stimulation , Electroencephalography , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement
10.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 37(5): 564-72, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23289763

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains a challenge as both invasive methods and symptom-based strategies have limitations. The symptom-based management of GERD in primary care may be further optimised with the use of a questionnaire. AIM: To assess the diagnostic validity of the GerdQ questionnaire in patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD. METHODS: Patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD without alarm features, underwent upper endoscopy, and if normal, pH-metry. Patients were followed for 4 weeks and GerdQ was completed blinded to the investigator at both visits. Reflux oesophagitis or pathological acid exposure was used as diagnostic references for GERD. The diagnostic accuracy for GERD on symptom response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) was assessed. RESULTS: Among the 169 patients, a GerdQ cutoff ≥9 gave the best balance with regard to sensitivity, 66% (95% CI: 58-74), and specificity, 64% (95% CI: 41-83), for GERD. The high prevalence of reflux oesophagitis (81%) resulted in a high proportion of true positives, but at the same time a high proportion of false-negatives. Consequently, GerdQ had a high positive predictive value, 92% (95% CI: 86-97), but a low negative predictive value, 22% (95% CI: 13-34), for GERD. Symptom resolution on PPI therapy had high sensitivity, 76% (95% CI: 66-84), but low specificity, 33% (95% CI: 17-53), for GERD. CONCLUSIONS: GerdQ is a useful complementary tool for the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care. The implementation of GerdQ could reduce the need for upper endoscopy and improve resource utilisation. Symptom resolution on proton pump inhibitor did not predict gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.


Subject(s)
Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Adult , Endoscopy/methods , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Gastroesophageal Reflux/psychology , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Male , Middle Aged
11.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 36(10): 959-71, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22998687

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sustained acid inhibition with PPI stimulates gastrin secretion, exerting a proliferative drive on enterochromaffin-like cells (ECL cells) of the oxyntic mucosa. It may also accelerate development of gastric gland atrophy in Helicobacter pylori-infected individuals. AIMS: To evaluate gastric exocrine and endocrine cell changes in GERD patients randomised to laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS, n = 288) or long-term (5 years) esomeprazole (ESO) treatment (n = 266). METHODS: Antral and corpus biopsies were taken at endoscopy and serum gastrin and chromogranin A levels were assayed, at baseline and after 1, 3 and 5 years' therapy. RESULTS: Biopsies were available at each time point for 158 LARS patients and 180 ESO patients. In H. pylori-infected subjects, antral mucosal inflammation and activity improved significantly (P < 0.001) and stabilised after 3 years on esomeprazole while no change in inflammation was observed after LARS. Oxyntic mucosal inflammation and activity remained stable on esomeprazole but decreased slightly over time after LARS. Neither intestinal metaplasia nor atrophy developed in the oxyntic mucosa. ECL cell density increased significantly after ESO (P < 0.001), corresponding with an increase in circulating gastrin and chromogranin A. After LARS, there was a significant decrease in ECL cell density (P < 0.05), accompanied by a marginal decrease in gastrin and chromogranin. CONCLUSIONS: Antral gastritis improved in H. pylori-infected GERD patients after 5 years on esomeprazole, with little change in laparoscopic antireflux surgery patients, who acted as a control. Despite a continued proliferative drive on enterochromaffin-like cells during esomeprazole treatment, no dysplastic or neoplastic lesions were found and no safety concerns were raised. NCT 00251927.


Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents/therapeutic use , Enterochromaffin-like Cells/pathology , Esomeprazole/therapeutic use , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy , Helicobacter pylori/isolation & purification , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Chromogranin A/blood , Enterochromaffin-like Cells/metabolism , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gastric Acid/metabolism , Gastric Mucosa/drug effects , Gastric Mucosa/metabolism , Gastrins/blood , Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications , Helicobacter Infections/complications , Humans , Laparoscopy , Male , Middle Aged , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
12.
Int J Clin Pract ; 66(9): 897-905, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22805293

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Response to treatment among primary care patients with gastro-oesophageal disease (GERD) is variable. AIM: The GERD Management Project (GMP) evaluated the effectiveness of a structured management approach to GERD vs. standard treatment (usual care). METHODS: Data from five cluster-randomised clinical trials in adult primary care patients with symptoms of GERD were pooled. The structured pathway was based on the self-administered GERD Questionnaire (GerdQ) and was compared with standard treatment. RESULTS: 1734 patients were enrolled (structured treatment, n=834; standard treatment, n=900). The difference in the mean GerdQ score change from baseline favoured the structured pathway (-0.61; 95% CI: -0.88, -0.34; p<0.001). The odds ratio for an indication for treatment revision at the end of follow-up (structured vs. standard treatment) was 0.39 (95% CI: 0.29, 0.52; p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Management of primary care patients with GERD can be improved by systematic stratification of patients using a patient management tool such as the GerdQ.


Subject(s)
Gastroesophageal Reflux/therapy , Cluster Analysis , Critical Pathways , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Surveys and Questionnaires
13.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 35(11): 1290-300, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22510027

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains challenging. An algorithm, facilitated by a questionnaire, may provide a more structured and cost-effective care of patients. AIM: To compare symptom control achieved with empirical therapy for GERD, in an algorithm based on the GerdQ (new structured pathway, NSP), with that of current care after endoscopy (ordinary clinical pathway, OCP). METHODS: Patients with symptoms of GERD, but without alarm features, were randomised in an open, parallel-group study and followed for 4-8 weeks. In the NSP, GerdQ score was used as a basis for both diagnosis and a treatment algorithm. Patients with high likelihood of GERD were treated empirically with a PPI whereas patients with low likelihood of GERD received therapy chosen by the clinician. In the OCP, diagnosis and treatment were based on endoscopy or pH-metry findings. The statistical hypothesis was non-inferiority of NSP to OCP. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients (86.5%) in the NSP and 133 patients (80.1%) in the OCP arm were responders. Overall, NSP was non-inferior to OCP, but not superior (P = 0.14). Patients with high likelihood of GERD had significantly better symptom relief in the NSP (P = 0.03), whereas those with low likelihood of GERD showed a numerical difference in favour of an endoscopy-based approach (OCP). NSP saved 146 € per patient. CONCLUSIONS: A symptom-based approach using GerdQ reduced health care costs without loss in efficacy. Patients with high likelihood GERD benefited from empirical treatment. An algorithm based on GerdQ may provide physicians with a tool for a more structured care of patients (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00842387).


Subject(s)
Endoscopy/methods , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Gastroesophageal Reflux/therapy , Severity of Illness Index , Adult , Algorithms , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/economics , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Male , Middle Aged , Statistics as Topic , Surveys and Questionnaires
14.
Int J Mol Med ; 29(5): 723-31, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22366773

ABSTRACT

Most patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) believe that diet plays a significant role in inducing IBS symptoms and desire to know what foods to avoid. It has been found that the intake of calories, carbohydrates, proteins and fat by IBS patients does not differ from that of the background population. IBS patients were found to avoid certain food items that are rich in fermentable oligo-, di- and monosacharides and polyols (FODMAPs), but they did have a high consumption of many other FODMAP-rich food items. The diet of IBS patients was found to consist of a low calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, vitamin B2 and vitamin A content. There is no consistent evidence that IBS patients suffer from food allergy, nor is there documented evidence that food intolerance plays a role in IBS symptoms. Abnormalities in gut hormones have been reported in IBS patients. As gut hormones control and regulate gastrointestinal motility and sensation, this may explain the abnormal gastrointestinal motility and visceral hypersensitivity reported in these patients. Guidance concerning food management which includes individually based restrictions of FODMAP-rich food items and individual evaluation of the effects of protein-, fat- and carbohydrate-rich/poor diets may reduce IBS symptoms.


Subject(s)
Colon/pathology , Diet/adverse effects , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diet therapy , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/etiology , Animals , Colon/metabolism , Food/adverse effects , Hormones/metabolism , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/metabolism , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/pathology
15.
Dig Dis Sci ; 57(4): 873-8, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22057239

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The gut hormones are important in regulating gastrointestinal motility. Disturbances in gastrointestinal motility have been reported in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Reduced endocrine cell density, as revealed by chromogranin A, has been reported in the colon of IBS patients. AIMS: To investigate a possible abnormality in the colonic endocrine cells of IBS patients. METHODS: A total of 41 patients with IBS according to Rome Criteria III and 20 controls were included in the study. Biopsies from the right and left colon were obtained from both patients and controls during colonoscopy. The biopsies were immunostained for serotonin, peptide YY (PYY), pancreatic polypeptide (PP), entroglucagon, and somatostatin cells. Cell densities were quantified by computerized image analysis. RESULTS: Serotonin and PYY cell densities were reduced in the colon of IBS patients. PP, entroglucagon, and somatostatin-immunoreactive cells were too few to enable reliable quantification. CONCLUSION: The cause of these observations could be primary genetic defect(s), secondary to altered serotonin and/or PYY signaling systems and/or subclinical inflammation. Serotonin activates the submucosal sensory branch of the enteric nervous system and controls gastrointestinal motility and chloride secretion via interneurons and motor neurons. PYY stimulates absorption of water and electrolytes, and inhibits prostaglandin (PG) E2, and vasoactive intestinal peptide, which stimulates intestinal fluid secretion and is a major regulator of the "ileal brake". Although the cause and effect relationship of these findings is difficult to elucidate, the abnormalities reported here might contribute to the symptoms associated with IBS.


Subject(s)
Colon/metabolism , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/metabolism , Peptide YY/metabolism , Serotonin/metabolism , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Colon/pathology , Constipation/etiology , Constipation/metabolism , Constipation/pathology , Diarrhea/etiology , Diarrhea/metabolism , Diarrhea/pathology , Female , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/complications , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
16.
Neurogastroenterol Motil ; 22(11): 1170-6, e309-11, 2010 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20618835

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Functional chest pain is commonly reproduced by bag distension in the esophageal body. It is unknown whether such pain is primarily associated with mechanical stress and strain (force-deformation) or with changes in mucosal perfusion. METHODS: Fourteen patients (6M, 8F, average age 55.9 years) underwent ramp bag distension before and after injection of 20 mg butylscopolamine bromide (BS) using a novel bag catheter incorporating endosonography and laser Doppler perfusion monitoring. Healthy subjects served as controls. Mucosal perfusion was evaluated and stress and strain were computed and related to the sensation. KEY RESULTS: The symptom score increased with bag volume (P < 0.001). Volume as a function of pressure was higher in patients than in controls (P < 0.001), both before and during BS. The stress-strain relationship was exponential and indicated a stiffer esophageal wall in patients especially before BS (P < 0.01). The stress-strain curves indicate increased muscle tone in the functional chest pain patients. The perfusion decreased with increasing symptom score from visual analog scale 1-7 during BS. The decrease was on average 18.9% in patients and 19.7% in controls (P = ns). Multiple regression analysis from distensions during BS showed that the discomfort/pain sensations depended on stress and strain (P < 0.001) and with stress as the largest contributor. Perfusion did not contribute. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Pain evoked by bag distension in patients with functional chest pain is stress-dependent rather than dependent on mucosal perfusion. Furthermore, the esophagus of the patients was characterized by more pronounced muscle tone during the distensions.


Subject(s)
Chest Pain/physiopathology , Esophagus/blood supply , Esophagus/physiology , Ischemia/physiopathology , Stress, Mechanical , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Catheterization , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Esophagus/diagnostic imaging , Female , Hemodynamics/physiology , Humans , Laser-Doppler Flowmetry , Male , Manometry , Middle Aged , Mucous Membrane/blood supply , Pain Measurement , Physical Stimulation , Regional Blood Flow/physiology , Ultrasonography , Young Adult
17.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 12(10): 1646-54; discussion 1654-5, 2008 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18709511

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The long-term management of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) is not well supported by an evidence-based consensus. We compare treatment outcome in patients with and without BE submitted to standardized laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) or esomeprazole treatment. METHODS: In the Long-Term Usage of Acid Suppression Versus Antireflux Surgery trial (a European multicenter randomized study), LARS was compared with dose-adjusted esomeprazole (20-40 mg daily). Operative difficulty, complications, symptom outcomes [Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD)], and treatment failure at 3 years and pH testing (after 6 months) are reported. RESULTS: Of 554 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, 60 had BE-28 randomized to esomeprazole and 32 to LARS. Very few BE patients on either treatment strategy (four of 60) experienced treatment failure during the 3-year follow-up. Esophageal pH in BE patients was significantly better controlled after surgical treatment than after esomeprazole (p = 0.002), although mean GSRS and QOLRAD scores were similar for the two therapies at baseline and at 3 years. Although operative difficulty was slightly greater in patients with BE than those without, there was no difference in postoperative complications or level of symptomatic reflux control. CONCLUSION: In a well-controlled surgical environment, the success of LARS is similar in patients with or without BE and matches optimized medical therapy.


Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents/therapeutic use , Barrett Esophagus/therapy , Esomeprazole/therapeutic use , Fundoplication , Gastroesophageal Reflux/therapy , Barrett Esophagus/etiology , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications , Humans , Laparoscopy , Male , Middle Aged
18.
Gut ; 57(9): 1207-13, 2008 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18469091

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: With the introduction of laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) along with the increasing efficacy of modern medical treatment, a direct comparison is warranted. The 3-year interim results of a randomised study comparing both the efficacy and safety of LARS and esomeprazole (ESO) are reported. METHODS: LOTUS is an open, parallel-group multicentre, randomised and controlled trial conducted in dedicated centres in 11 European countries. LARS was completed according to a standardised protocol, comprising a total fundoplication and a crural repair. Medical treatment comprised ESO 20 mg once daily, which could be increased stepwise to 40 mg once daily and then 20 mg twice daily in the case of incomplete GORD control. The primary outcome variable was time to treatment failure (Kaplan-Meier analysis). Treatment failure was defined on the basis of symptomatic relapse requiring treatment beyond that stated in the protocol. RESULTS: 554 patients were randomised, of whom 288 were allocated to LARS and 266 to ESO. The two study arms were well matched. The proportions of patients who remained in remission after 3 years were similar for the two therapies: 90% of surgical patients compared with 93% medically treated for the intention to treat population, p = 0.25 (90% vs 95% per protocol). No major unexpected postoperative complications were experienced and ESO was well tolerated. However, postfundoplication complaints remain a problem after LARS. CONCLUSIONS: Over the first 3 years of this long-term study, both laparoscopic total fundoplication and continuous ESO treatment were similarly effective and well-tolerated therapeutic strategies for providing effective control of GORD.


Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents/therapeutic use , Esomeprazole/therapeutic use , Fundoplication/methods , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Adult , Anti-Ulcer Agents/adverse effects , Chronic Disease , Esomeprazole/adverse effects , Female , Fundoplication/adverse effects , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
19.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 28(1): 107-26, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18384662

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The development of well-tolerated acid suppressant drugs has stimulated substantial growth in the number of trials assessing therapy options for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). AIM: To develop consensus statements to inform clinical trial design in adult patients with GERD. METHODS: Draft statements were developed employing a systematic literature review. A modified Delphi process including three rounds of voting was used to reach consensus. Between voting, statements were revised based on feedback from the Working Group and additional literature reviews. The final vote was at a face-to-face meeting that included discussion time. Voting was conducted using a six-point scale. RESULTS: At the last vote, 93% of the final 102 statements achieved consensus (defined a priori as being supported by >or=75% of the votes). The Working Group strongly supported the development of validated patient-reported outcome instruments. Symptom assessments carried out by the investigator were considered unacceptable. There was agreement that exclusion from clinical trials should be minimized to improve generalizability, that prospective evaluation ideally requires electronic timed/dated methods and that endoscopists should be blinded to patient symptom status. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the consensus statements will improve the quality and comparability of trials, and make them compatible with regulatory requirements.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic/standards , Gastroesophageal Reflux/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Middle Aged
20.
Br J Surg ; 94(2): 198-203, 2007 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17256807

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This randomized clinical trial compared long-term outcome after antireflux surgery with acid inhibition therapy in the treatment of chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). METHODS: Patients with chronic GORD and oesophagitis verified at endoscopy were allocated to treatment with omeprazole (154 patients) or antireflux surgery (144). After 7 years of follow-up, 119 patients in the omeprazole arm and 99 who had antireflux surgery were available for evaluation. The primary outcome variable was the cumulative proportion of patients in whom treatment failed. Secondary objectives were evaluation of the treatment failure rate after dose adjustment of omeprazole, safety, and the frequency and severity of post-fundoplication complaints. RESULTS: The proportion of patients in whom treatment did not fail during the 7 years was significantly higher in the surgical than in the medical group (66.7 versus 46.7 per cent respectively; P=0.002). A smaller difference remained after dose adjustment in the omeprazole group (P=0.045). More patients in the surgical group complained of symptoms such as dysphagia, inability to belch or vomit, and rectal flatulence. These complaints were fairly stable throughout the study interval. The mean daily dose of omeprazole was 22.8, 24.1, 24.3 and 24.3 mg at 1, 3, 5 and 7 years respectively. CONCLUSION: Chronic GORD can be treated effectively by either antireflux surgery or omeprazole therapy. After 7 years, surgery was more effective in controlling overall disease symptoms, but specific post-fundoplication complaints remained a problem. There appeared to be no dose escalation of omeprazole with time.


Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents/therapeutic use , Esophagitis/therapy , Fundoplication/methods , Gastroesophageal Reflux/therapy , Omeprazole/therapeutic use , Proton Pump Inhibitors , Aged , Anti-Ulcer Agents/adverse effects , Esophagitis/complications , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Omeprazole/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Reoperation , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...