Differential centiloid scale normalization techniques: comparison between hybrid PET/MRI and independently acquired MRI.

OBJECTIVE: Centiloid (CL) scales play an important role in semiquantitative analyses of amyloid-ß (Aß) PET. CLs are derived from the standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR), which needs Aß positron emission tomography (PET) normalization processing. There are two methods to collect the T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) for normalization: (i) anatomical standardization using simultaneously acquired T1WI (PET/MRI), usually adapted to PET images from PET/MRI scanners, and (ii) T1WI from a separate examination (PET + MRI), usually adapted to PET images from PET/CT scanners. This study aimed to elucidate the correlations and differences in CLs between when using the above two T1WI collection methods. METHODS: Among patients who underwent Aß PET/MRI (using 11C-Pittuberg compound B (11C-PiB) or 18F-flutemetamol (18F-FMM)) at our institution from 2015 to 2023, we selected 49 patients who also underwent other additional MRI examinations, including T1WI for anatomic standardization within 3 years. Thirty-one of them underwent 11C-PiB PET/MRI, and 18 participants underwent 18F-FMM PET/MRI. Twenty-five of them, additional MRI acquisition parameters were identical to simultaneous MRI during PET, and 24 participants were different. After normalization using PET/MRI or PET + MRI method each, SUVR was measured using the Global Alzheimer's Association Initiative Network cerebral cortical and striatum Volume of Interest templates (VOI) and whole cerebellum VOI. Subsequently, CLs were calculated using the previously established equations for each Aß PET tracer. RESULTS: Between PET/MRI and PET + MRI methods, CLs correlated linearly in 11C-PiB PET (y = 1.00x - 0.11, R2 = 0.999), 18F-FMM PET (y = 0.97x - 0.12, 0.997), identical additional MRI acquisition (y = 1.00x + 0.33, 0.999), different acquisition (y = 0.98x - 0.43, 0.997), and entire study group (y = 1.00x - 0.24, 0.999). Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed no significant differences: 11C-PiB (p = 0.49), 18F-FMM (0.08), and whole PET (0.46). However, significant differences were identified in identical acquisition (p = 0.04) and different acquisition (p = 0.02). Bland-Altman analysis documented only a small bias between PET/MRI and PET + MRI in 11C-PiB PET, 18F-FMM PET, identical additional MRI acquisition, different acquisition, and whole PET (- 0.05, 0.67, - 0.30, 0.78, and 0.21, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical standardizations using PET/MRI and using PET + MRI can lead to almost equivalent CL. The CL values obtained using PET/MRI or PET + MRI normalization methods are consistent and comparable in clinical studies.

[Oculomotor nerve palsy with preserved pupillary reaction in two cases of neurolymphomatosis].

Case 1: A 64-year-old woman with acute ptosis and diplopia was admitted to our hospital. She had right oculomotor nerve palsy with preserved pupillary reaction without any other neurological deficits. MRI showed abnormal enhancement in the right oculomotor nerve. An ovarian tumor was detected on CT examination, and was pathologically diagnosed as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Cerebrospinal fluid cytology disclosed malignant lymphoma cells. Based on the above findings, we concluded that she had neurolymphomatosis (NL) of the right oculomotor nerve. Case 2: A 63-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital due to weakness of the bilateral lower extremities and gait disturbance. Lumbar MRI showed enhanced lesions in the cauda equina, and we diagnosed her as having DLBCL based on bone marrow aspiration study. She later developed right oculomotor nerve palsy with preserved pupillary reaction together with the right abducens and hypoglossal nerve palsies, which were caused by NL. Our cases suggest that oculomotor nerve palsy with preserved pupillary reaction can be a clinical feature of NL. Although NL mainly affects the subperinerium, as parasympathetic fibers are located in the periphery of the oculomotor nerve and supplied by pia matar blood vessels, patients with NL may shows this clinical feature.

Acute retrobulbar optic neuritis with anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease complicated with microscopic polyangiitis: A case report.

RATIONALE: Anti-myelin oligodendrocyte protein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) is a new disease entity with various clinical phenotypes. MOGAD often present with recurrent optic neuritis (ON), and it can also develop as a compartment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Moreover, multiple autoantibodies such as an anti-myeloperoxidase antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (MPO-ANCA) had been reported in the serum of patients with NMOSD. PATIENT CONCERNS: We report an 86-year-old woman with a 2-year history of microscopic polyangiitis (MPA). The patient had a rapid loss of vision in her left eye. No abnormal findings were observed on her left fundus, and she tested negative for MPO-ANCA upon admission. However, anti-MOG antibodies were observed in the patient's serum and cerebrospinal fluid. DIAGNOSIS: A diagnosis of MOGAD complicated with MPA was made. INTERVENTIONS: The patient received twice steroid pulse therapy and oral azathioprine as maintenance therapy. OUTCOMES: Her vision rapidly recovered, and no subsequent relapse was observed during the 8-month observation period. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of MOGAD complicated with MPA, and steroid pulse therapy and azathioprine therapy were effective for ON caused by MOGAD.

Pitfalls in clinical diagnosis of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis.

OBJECTIVES: To report pitfalls in the clinical diagnosis of anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical information of 221 patients with clinically suspected autoimmune neurological disorders who underwent testing for autoantibodies against neuronal cell-surface antigens between January 1, 2007 and September 10, 2017. Forty-one patients met the diagnostic criteria for probable anti-NMDAR encephalitis (probable criteria), but one was excluded because neither serum nor CSF was examined at the active stage. Thus, in 220 patients, sensitivity and specificity of the probable criteria were assessed. RESULTS: NMDAR-antibodies were detected in 34 of 40 patients (85%) with the probable criteria; however, 2 of the 6 antibody-negative patients had ovarian teratoma. The median age at onset was higher in antibody-negative patients than those with antibodies (49 vs. 27 years, p = 0.015). The age at onset was associated with the probability of antibody detection (p = 0.014); the probability was less than 50% in patients aged 50 years or older. NMDAR-antibodies were also detected in 5 of 180 patients who did not fulfill the probable criteria; these patients presented with isolated epileptic syndrome (n = 2), atypical demyelinating syndrome (n = 2; one with aquaporin 4 antibodies), and autoimmune post-herpes simplex encephalitis (post-HSE) (n = 1). Sensitivity and specificity of the probable criteria was 87.2 and 96.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The probable criteria are valid, but the diversity of clinical phenotype should be taken into account in diagnosing anti-NMDAR encephalitis particularly in patients aged 50 years or older, or with isolated epileptic syndrome, atypical demyelinating syndrome, or post-HSE.

[A case of leptomeningeal melanomatosis with acute paraplegia and multiple cranial nerve palsies].

A 62-year-old man with acute paraplegia was transferred to our hospital. He had flaccid paraplegia and multiple cranial nerve palsies, such as mydriasis of the left pupil, abduction palsy of the left eye, hoarseness and dysphagia, but no meningeal irritation signs. MRI of the spinal canal showed swellings of the conus medullaris and the cauda equine, and also contrast enhancement of the spinal meninges. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) showed pleocytosis and protein increment. The lymph node was swollen in his right axilla. The biopsy specimen from the right axillary lymph node revealed metastasis of malignant melanoma histologically. Careful check-up of his whole body found a malignant melanoma in the subungual region of the right ring finger. Repeated cytological examination revealed melanoma cells in the CSF, confirming the diagnosis of leptomeningeal melanomatosis. His consciousness was gradually deteriorated. His family members chose supportive care instead of chemotherapy or surgical therapy after full information about his conditions. Finally, he died 60 days after transfer to our hospital. This is a rare case of leptomenigeal melanomatosis presenting with acute paraplegia and multiple cranial nerve palsies. Careful follow-up and repeated studies are vital for the early diagnosis of leptomenigeal melanomatosis in spite of atypical clinical presentation.