Monitoring of timely and delayed vaccinations: a nation-wide registry-based study of Norwegian children aged < 2 years.

BACKGROUND: Delayed vaccinations increase the risk for vaccine preventable diseases (VPDs). Monitoring of delayed vaccinations by using a national immunisation registry has not been studied in countries recommending a two-dose (3 and 5 months of age) primary series of e.g., pertussis vaccine. Surveillance/monitoring of all vaccinations may improve vaccination programmes functioning. METHODS: We obtained information from the Norwegian immunisation registry (SYSVAK) on all programme vaccinations received at age up to 730 days in children born in 2010 (n = 63,382). Timely vaccinations were received up to 7 days after the recommended age. Vaccinations were considered delayed if they were received more than one month after the recommended age in the schedule. RESULTS: In vaccinated children, timely administration of the subsequent three doses of pertussis and one dose of measles occurred in 73.8, 47.6, 53.6 and 43.5 % respectively. Delay for one or more programme vaccinations (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, Haemophilus influenza type B, invasive pneumococcal disease, measles, mumps or rubella) was present in 28,336 (44.7 %) children. Among those who were delayed the mean duration was 139 days. The proportion of children that had vaccinations delayed differed among counties (range 37.4 %-57.8 %). Immigrant children were more frequently delayed 52.3 % vs. 43.1 %, RR 1.21 (95 % CI 1.19, 1.24). Children scheduled for vaccines in the summer holiday month (July) were more frequently delayed than others (1(st) dose pertussis vaccine 6.5 % vs. 3.9 % RR 1.65 (95 % CI 1.48, 1.85). Priming against pertussis (2(nd) dose), pneumococcal (2(nd) dose) and measles (1(st) dose) was delayed in 16.8, 18.6 and 29.3 % respectively. CONCLUSION: Vaccinations were frequently delayed. Delayed vaccinations differed among counties and occurred more frequently during the summer vacation (July) and in the immigrant population. Monitoring improves programme surveillance and may be used on an annual basis.

Intranasal administration of a therapeutic HIV vaccine (Vacc-4x) induces dose-dependent systemic and mucosal immune responses in a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Vacc-4x, a Gag p24-based therapeutic HIV vaccine, has been shown to reduce viral load set-points after intradermal administration. In this randomized controlled pilot study we investigate intranasal administration of Vacc-4x with Endocine as adjuvant. METHODS: Safety and immunogenicity were tested in patients on effective ART. They were randomized to low, medium or high dose Vacc-4x or adjuvant alone, administered four times at weekly intervals with no booster. Vacc-4x-specific T cell responses were measured in vitro by proliferation and in vivo by a single DTH skin test at the end of study. Nasal and rectal mucosal secretions were analyzed for Vacc-4x-specific antibodies by ELISA. Immune regulation induced by Vacc-4x was assessed by functional blockade of the regulatory cytokines IL-10 and TGF-ß. RESULTS: Vacc-4x proliferative T cell responses increased only among the vaccinated (p ≤ 0.031). The low dose group showed the greatest increase in Vacc-4x CD8+T cell responses (p = 0.037) and developed larger DTH (p = 0.005) than the adjuvant group. Rectal (distal) Vacc-4x IgA and IgG antibodies also increased (p = 0.043) in this group. In contrast, the high dose generated higher nasal (local) Vacc-4x IgA (p = 0.028) and serum IgG (p = 0.030) antibodies than the adjuvant. Irrespective of dose, increased Vacc-4x CD4+T cell responses were associated with low proliferation (r = -0.82, p < 0.001) and high regulation (r = 0.61, p = 0.010) at baseline. CONCLUSION: Intranasal administration of Vacc-4x with Endocine was safe and induced dose-dependent vaccine-specific T cell responses and both mucosal and systemic humoral responses. The clinical significance of dose, immune regulation and mucosal immunity warrants further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01473810.

A non-living nasal influenza vaccine can induce major humoral and cellular immune responses in humans without the need for adjuvants.

Twenty-eight healthy adult volunteers were immunized intranasally with an inactivated whole-virus influenza vaccine based on the strain A/New Caledonia/20/99 (H1N1), either in saline or mixed with formaldehyde-inactivated Bordetella pertussis as a mucosal adjuvant, or in a thixotropic vehicle with mucoadhesive properties. After four doses, all groups of vaccinees developed significant IgG- and IgA-antibody responses, measured by ELISA, in respectively serum and nasal secretions. None of the volunteers had demonstrable hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) antibodies in serum before being immunized, whereas more than 80% of them reached HAI titers>or=40, considered protective, after immunizations. In addition, cellular immune responses, measured as significant increases in CD4+ T-cell proliferation and granzyme B-producing cytotoxic T-cells, were detected against the vaccine strain as well as against heterologous virus strains (H3N2). However, no additive effect on these responses could be demonstrated with use of B. pertussis or the thixotropic substance in the present vaccines. It appeared, actually, that the mucoadhesive vehicle containing the thixotropic substance was less efficient than were the two other formulations. An influenza vaccine made as a simple particulate formulation of inactivated virus, and given repeatedly onto the nasal mucosa, may thus be an attractive alternative to currently available vaccines.

Immunisation schedules for non-replicating nasal vaccines can be made simple by allowing time for development of immunological memory.

Mice immunised intranasally with multiple doses of outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) from group B meningococci developed antibody responses that depended on the interval between doses. High levels of antibodies in saliva and extracts of faeces were induced within 4 weeks after an OMV vaccine had been given at weekly intervals, whereas the antibody responses in these samples were negligible when given four times at 1-day or 1-h intervals, or as one large dose. Only modest responses were obtained in serum after 4 weeks, however, whether the vaccine had been given repeatedly at any schedule, including the 1-week interval, or as one dose. On the other hand, two large doses given 8 weeks apart induced booster antibody responses in both serum and secretions that matched the responses from a second series of the four smaller doses. Intranasal immunisations may thus stimulate immunological memory more rapidly in secretions than in serum. In order to secure adequate systemic responses by a minimum of doses, nasal vaccines should therefore be given at intervals longer than 4 weeks, in harmony with the intervals recommended for injectable vaccines.

Bordetella pertussis can act as adjuvant as well as inhibitor of immune responses to non-replicating nasal vaccines.

In mice immunised intranasally with an inactivated whole-virus influenza (INV) vaccine, or ovalbumin (OVA), formalin-inactivated Bordetella pertussis (Bp) augmented antibody responses to the same degree as did cholera toxin (CT) when simply being mixed with INV or OVA. In order to study possible non-carrier effects of mucosal adjuvants, mice were given Bp or CT intranasally 1 day before or 1 day after the INV vaccines. At high antigen doses, both Bp and CT had an adjuvant effect on antibodies in serum also when given 1 day after the vaccine. However, Bp and CT inhibited such antibody responses in serum and saliva when given 1 day ahead of the vaccine. This inhibitory effect was most marked at low antigen doses, i.e. when the adjuvant effect was less obvious. In that event, Bp also inhibited responses in serum and saliva when given 1 day after the INV vaccine. The inhibition of these responses may thus depend on Bp and CT themselves being strongly immunogenic, and competing with INV for the functional capacity of the mucosal immune system.

Influence of intravenous anesthesia on mucosal and systemic antibody responses to nasal vaccines.

Inhalation of antigens may stimulate the immune system by way of the upper as well as the lower airways. We have shown that at least 1,000 times more live pneumococci were recovered from pulmonary tissue after being presented as drops of a liquid suspension onto the nares of anesthetized mice compared to the number of bacteria recovered from animals that were not anesthetized in the course of the challenge. Mice that were similarly immunized intranasally by inhalation of three different nonreplicating particulate vaccine formulations, i.e., a meningococcal outer membrane vesicle (OMV) vaccine, a formalin-inactivated whole-virus influenza (INV) vaccine, and the INV vaccine with OMVs as a mucosal adjuvant, during general intravenous anesthesia developed concentrations of vaccine-specific serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies that were four to nine times higher than in mice that were fully awake during immunizations. The concentrations of IgA antibodies in serum were also higher in anesthetized than in nonanesthetized mice and correlated positively with the corresponding levels of serum IgG antibodies in the anesthetized but not in the nonanesthetized mice. In saliva and feces, however, the concentrations of IgA antibodies were equally high whether or not the animals were dormant during immunizations. The results indicate that intrapulmonary antigen presentation, as a part of an intranasal immunization strategy, is of importance for systemic but not for mucosal antibody responses. A major portion of IgA antibodies in serum may thus be derived from nonmucosal sites.