Phase II study of weekly docetaxel and capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of weekly docetaxel and capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with metastatic breast cancer received 30 mg/m2 of docetaxel on days 1, 8, and 15 in combination with capecitabine 800 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-21, repeated every 28 days. RESULTS: The median number of treatment cycles was 4 (range, 1-20 cycles). Grade 3 toxicities per patient were asthenia (n = 7; 18%), diarrhea (n = 7; 18%), nausea/vomiting (n = 5; 13%), stomatitis (n = 5; 13%), neutropenia (n = 5; 13%), and hand-foot syndrome (n = 4; 10%). There were only 2 grade 4 toxicities, febrile neutropenia and pulmonary embolism. The overall response rate was 44% (95% confidence interval (CI), 28%-60%), median duration of response was 9.1 months (95% CI, 6.2-12 months), and median time to progression was 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.7-7.3 months). CONCLUSION: Weekly docetaxel with capecitabine was active with acceptable toxicities. Additional trials to define the optimal schedule of docetaxel and capecitabine are justified.

Phase II trial of bevacizumab in combination with weekly docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab and weekly docetaxel as first- or second-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven MBC patients received i.v. bevacizumab at 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 15 in combination with i.v. docetaxel 35 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Primary end points were to assess toxicity, overall response rate, and progression-free survival. A secondary end point was to assess the relationship between plasma endothelial and cell adhesion markers and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: One-hundred fifty-eight treatment cycles were administered with a median of six cycles (range 1-15 cycles) per patient. The most common grade 4 toxicities per patient were as follows: 2 (7%)-pulmonary embolus, 1 (4%)-febrile neutropenia, and 1 (4%)-infection; grade 3 toxicities were 4 (15%)-neutropenia, 4 (15%)-fatigue, 2 (7%)-neuropathy, 2 (7%)-athralgias, 2 (7%)-stomatitis, 1 (7%)-pleural effusion, and 1 (4%)-hypertension. The overall response rate was 52% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 32-71%], median response duration was 6.0 months (95% CI, 4.6-6.5 months), and the median progression-free survival was 7.5 months (95% CI, 6.2-8.3 months). In hypothesis-generating univariate and limited multivariate analyses, E-selectin was statistically significantly associated with response to the combination. CONCLUSION: Bevazicumab in combination with weekly docetaxel is active with acceptable toxicities in MBC. Additional studies evaluating E-selectin as a marker of response to bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy are warranted.

Phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel followed by epirubicin in stage II/III breast cancer.

PURPOSE: In most neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens, the taxane is administered either in combination with an anthracycline or after an anthracycline-containing regimen. We sought to test the feasibility, safety, and determine the pathological complete response (pCR) rate of administering docetaxel first followed by epirubicin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with clinical stage II, III breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five women with newly diagnosed clinical stage IIB (n = 10), IIIA (n = 5), or IIIB (n = 10) received 3 cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/M2 intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks followed by 3 cycles of epirubicin 100 mg/M2 IV every 3 weeks. pCR was defined as the absence of invasive cancer in the breast at definitive surgery. RESULTS: The median primary tumor size was 6 cm (range 1-12 cm), and 13 (52%) women had clinically palpable axillary lymph nodes. Patients received 149 of the 150 planned cycles of docetaxel and epirubicin without treatment delays, and only 3 (12%) patients had a dose reduction of docetaxel. Seven (28%) patients experienced febrile neutropenia, and 9 (36%) patients had grade 3 non-hematological toxicities with diarrhea being the most frequent in 3 (12%) patients. Six (24%) patients had pCR in the breast. Analysis of pre- and post-docetaxel biopsies from a subset of patients documented taxane-induced activation of mitogen-activated and stress-activated protein kinase pathways. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant docetaxel followed by epirubicin is well tolerated and active in breast cancer. To our knowledge, this is first description of docetaxel-induced activation of mitogen-activated and stress-activated protein kinase pathways in human breast cancer.

Age-dependent levels of plasma neuropeptides in normal children.

Several neuropeptides are secreted in high amounts in pediatric tumors such as neuroblastoma and have been used as markers of residual or recurrent disease. Plasma levels of neuropeptides might be expected to change during development, but have not been determined in normal children. We have obtained fresh plasma from cord blood of six full-term infants and from peripheral blood in 41 healthy children, ages 1 month to 21 years. Levels of six neuropeptides, vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), somatostatin, gastrin releasing peptide (GRP), substance P, pancreastatin and neuropeptide Y (NPY) were measured by radioimmunoassay along with insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) whose plasma levels are known to vary during development. A child with neuroblastoma was treated with the somatostatin analogue, octreotide, and the effect on plasma neuropeptides quantified. Octreotide doses of 2-3 microg/kg daily resulted in a 40-60% decrease in plasma levels of IGF-1, pancreastatin and GRP. These results are the first publication of plasma neuropeptide levels in normal children.

Pharmacobiologically based scheduling of capecitabine and docetaxel results in antitumor activity in resistant human malignancies.

PURPOSE: Capecitabine and docetaxel have demonstrated preclinical antitumor synergy. This synergy is thought to occur from docetaxel-mediated upregulation of thymidine phosphorylase (dThdPase), an enzyme responsible for the relative tumor selectivity of capecitabine. On the basis of the time-dependency and transiency for this upregulation, we performed a phase I study of capecitabine in combination with weekly docetaxel. We hypothesized that weekly docetaxel would result in sustained dThdPase expression and that capecitabine administration at times of maximum dThdPase upregulation would increase the therapeutic index for this combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancies received docetaxel on days 1, 8, and 15, and capecitabine bid on days 5 to 18, every 4 weeks. Docetaxel was fixed at 36 mg/m(2)/wk, whereas capecitabine was escalated in successive patients cohorts. RESULTS: Sixteen patients received 77 courses at capecitabine doses from 950 to 1,500 mg/m(2)/d. The most common toxicities were hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, and asthenia. Grades 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities were infrequent and no treatment-related hospitalizations occurred. Three of three patients treated at 1,500/36 mg/m(2) capecitabine/docetaxel developed grade 3 hand-foot syndrome or diarrhea during either their first or second course, whereas only two of 13 patients at 1,250/36 mg/m(2) doses developed significant toxicity. Antitumor responses (n = 7) occurred in patients with hepatocellular, non-small-cell lung, and chemotherapy-refractory breast, bladder, and colorectal carcinomas. Prolonged stabilizations occurred in patients with metastatic mesothelioma (n = 2), chemorefractory non-small-cell lung carcinoma, and bronchioloalveolar carcinoma. CONCLUSION: Capecitabine in combination with weekly docetaxel is well tolerated. Recommended doses are capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2)/d (625 mg/m(2) bid) with docetaxel 36 mg/m(2)/wk. The acceptable toxicity profile in this dose schedule, and the antitumor activity observed, warrant further evaluation of this regimen.