ABSTRACT
Risankizumab, a fully human IgG monoclonal antibody inhibitor of IL-23, is a therapeutic agent currently in late stage development for use in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. It is a biologic agent similar to guselkumab and tildrakizumab which targets IL-23 specifically, and has been primarily developed for use in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. USA-based pharmaceutical company Abbvie submitted it for a Biologics License Application to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in April 2018. Risankizumab is the result of a collaboration between the German company Boehringer Ingelheim and Abbvie, which together are leading the future development and commercialization of risankizumab globally. The results from Phase I to Phase III clinical trials of risankizumab show it is highly effective and its FDA-approval in 2018 is likely. In this article we provide an independent expert opinion on the efficacy and safety of risankizumab in psoriasis based on a full review of the literature.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Interleukin-23/immunology , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Psoriasis/immunology , Antigen-Antibody Reactions , HumansABSTRACT
We report the first case of atopic dermatitis successfully treated with the oral Janus kinase-1 (JAK1) inhibitor oclacitinib. A man in his 70s, with a 6-year history of skin disease refractory to topical and biologic therapies, self-prescribed this veterinary medication with rapid remission of symptoms. He has remained in remission for 7 months with no reported adverse side effects or infections. JAK1 plays a central role in expression of proinflammatory cytokines IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13, which play an important role in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis. Ruxolitinib and tofacitinib are JAK inhibitors currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of myelofibrosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and psoriatic arthritis in humans. Oclacitinib is not currently indicated for use in humans.
ABSTRACT
Given the recent National Institutes of Health proposal for balanced use of male and female cells and animals in preclinical studies, we explored whether sex bias exists in skin research. We surveyed 802 dermatological research articles from 2012 through 2013. No information about the sex of studied cells or animals was provided in 60% of papers. Among keratinocytes of known sex, 70% were male. Few studies compared male versus female cells or animals. Disclosure of sex and comparative studies contribute to our understanding of the biologic basis of sex differences. Addressing sex-speciï¬c differences in preclinical research informs subsequent clinical trial design and promotes individualized therapy.
Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , Sexism , Skin/cytology , Animals , Cells, Cultured , Cricetinae , Disease Models, Animal , Female , Fibroblasts/cytology , Humans , Keratinocytes/cytology , Male , Melanocytes/cytology , Mice , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/standards , Rabbits , Rats , Sheep , Swine , United States , ZebrafishABSTRACT
Children with atopic dermatitis (AD) experience significant sleep disruption, and clinically, the disease is noted to worsen in a circadian manner at night. Epidemiologic findings highlight many negative consequences of AD, such as impaired linear growth, which is uniquely related to disturbed sleep. Clinical guidelines currently recommend assessing sleep in patients with AD as a crucial parameter of disease control with appropriate treatment. In this review we describe our current understanding of the roles of sleep cycles and circadian rhythms in the nighttime exacerbation of AD (nocturnal eczema). We present a schematic to explain the mechanism of nocturnal eczema. Treatment options for sleep disturbance and future directions for research are discussed in the context of AD.
