Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 108(4): 1082-1090, 2020 11 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32629080

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Emerging evidence suggests that the heart is more radiosensitive than previously assumed; therefore, accounting for heart motion in radiation therapy planning is becoming more critical. In this study, we determined how much heart delineations based on 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT), 4-dimensional (4D) average projection (AVG), and maximum intensity projection (MIP) images should be extended to represent the full extent of heart motion during 4D imaging acquisition. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The 3D and 4D CT scans of 10 lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic ablative radiation therapy were used. Median surfaces were derived from heart delineations of 3 observers on the 3D CT, AVG, MIP, and 25% exhale scans. Per patient, the 25% exhale contour was propagated on every phase of the 4D scan. The union of all 4D phase delineations (U4D) represented the full extent of heart motion during imaging acquisition. Surface distances from U4D to 3D, AVG, and MIP volumes were calculated. Distances in the most extreme surface points (1.5 cm most superoinferior, 10% most right/left/anteroposterior) were used to derive margins accounting only for systematic (delineation) errors. RESULTS: Heart delineations on the MIP were the closest to the full extent of motion, requiring only ≤2.5-mm margins. Delineations on the AVG and 3D scans required margins up to 3.4 and 7.1 mm, respectively. The largest margins were for the inferior, right, and anterior aspects for the delineations on the 3D, AVG, and MIP scans, respectively. CONCLUSION: Delineations on 3D, AVG, or MIP scans required extensions for representing the heart's full extent of motion, with the MIP requiring the smallest margins. Research including daily imaging to determine the random components for the margins and dosimetric measurements to determine the relevance of creating a planning organ at risk volume of the heart is required.


Subject(s)
Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography/methods , Heart/diagnostic imaging , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Organ Motion , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiosurgery/methods , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Heart/physiology , Heart/radiation effects , Humans , Observer Variation , Organs at Risk/diagnostic imaging , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Radiation Tolerance , Respiration
2.
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med ; 34(3): 361-6, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21710233

ABSTRACT

The study aimed to assess the suitability of linear array metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor detectors (MOSFETs) as in vivo dosimeters to measure rectal dose in high dose rate brachytherapy treatments. The MOSFET arrays were calibrated with an Ir192 source and phantom measurements were performed to check agreement with the treatment planning system. The angular dependence, linearity and constancy of the detectors were evaluated. For in vivo measurements two sites were investigated, transperineal needle implants for prostate cancer and Fletcher suites for cervical cancer. The MOSFETs were inserted into the patients' rectum in theatre inside a modified flatus tube. The patients were then CT scanned for treatment planning. Measured rectal doses during treatment were compared with point dose measurements predicted by the TPS. The MOSFETs were found to require individual calibration factors. The calibration was found to drift by approximately 1% ±0.8 per 500 mV accumulated and varies with distance from source due to energy dependence. In vivo results for prostate patients found only 33% of measured doses agreed with the TPS within ±10%. For cervix cases 42% of measured doses agreed with the TPS within ±10%, however of those not agreeing variations of up to 70% were observed. One of the most limiting factors in this study was found to be the inability to prevent the MOSFET moving internally between the time of CT and treatment. Due to the many uncertainties associated with MOSFETs including calibration drift, angular dependence and the inability to know their exact position at the time of treatment, we consider them to be unsuitable for in vivo dosimetry in rectum for HDR brachytherapy.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy/instrumentation , Radiometry/instrumentation , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Body Burden , Brachytherapy/methods , Calibration , Equipment Design , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Iridium Radioisotopes , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Radiometry/methods , Rectum , Reproducibility of Results , Transistors, Electronic , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/radiotherapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...