Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
West J Emerg Med ; 19(1): 66-74, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29383058

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Clinical assessment of medical students in emergency medicine (EM) clerkships is a highly variable process that presents unique challenges and opportunities. Currently, clerkship directors use institution-specific tools with unproven validity and reliability that may or may not address competencies valued most highly in the EM setting. Standardization of assessment practices and development of a common, valid, specialty-specific tool would benefit EM educators and students. METHODS: A two-day national consensus conference was held in March 2016 in the Clerkship Directors in Emergency Medicine (CDEM) track at the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine (CORD) Academic Assembly in Nashville, TN. The goal of this conference was to standardize assessment practices and to create a national clinical assessment tool for use in EM clerkships across the country. Conference leaders synthesized the literature, articulated major themes and questions pertinent to clinical assessment of students in EM, clarified the issues, and outlined the consensus-building process prior to consensus-building activities. RESULTS: The first day of the conference was dedicated to developing consensus on these key themes in clinical assessment. The second day of the conference was dedicated to discussing and voting on proposed domains to be included in the national clinical assessment tool. A modified Delphi process was initiated after the conference to reconcile questions and items that did not reach an a priori level of consensus. CONCLUSION: The final tool, the National Clinical Assessment Tool for Medical Students in Emergency Medicine (NCAT-EM) is presented here.


Subject(s)
Clinical Clerkship/standards , Clinical Competence/standards , Consensus , Educational Measurement/standards , Emergency Medicine/education , Students, Medical , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Delphi Technique , Education, Medical , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Leadership , Models, Organizational , Physician Executives , United States
3.
West J Emerg Med ; 14(5): 411-4, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24106528

ABSTRACT

Dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) is a common presentation in the emergency department and has a wide differential. Most presentations of DUB are in hemodynamically stable patients and can be evaluated as an outpatient. Uterine arteriovenous malformation (AVM) is one presentation that can result in a life-threatening medical emergency with unexpected sudden and massive vaginal bleeding. We describe a case of a 24-year-old female with sudden heavy vaginal bleeding requiring a blood transfusion, ultrasound evidence of uterine AVM, and a treatment method of expectant management using an intrauterine device in an attempt to preserve fertility.

4.
Sex Transm Dis ; 36(4): 207-10, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19265735

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Many of the individuals most at risk for HIV infection (i.e., minority populations, women, adolescents) are also the most marginalized by our health care system. Lacking primary care providers, they rely on the Emergency Department (ED) for their health care needs and education. In this prospective randomized controlled trial, we compared the educational effectiveness of a 15-minute posttest counseling video with the normal practice of a session with an HIV counselor. The study population was composed of ambulatory patients recruited for rapid HIV testing in the ED. METHODS: The RAs (research assistants) recruited a convenience sample of stable patients presenting to the walk-in section of an inner-city adult ED for rapid HIV testing. Eligible patients for this study included patients who consented for the rapid HIV test and completed measures on condom intention and condom use self-efficacy. Before receiving their results, participants who consented to be in this study were randomized to either a 15-minute HIV posttest educational video available in English/Spanish or to a posttest educational session with an HIV counselor. Afterwards, both groups completed an assessment tool concerning HIV prevention and transmission. RESULTS: Of the 128 participants, 61 and 67 patients were randomized to the video and counselor groups, respectively. The groups were similar with respect to gender, ethnicity and experience with prior HIV testing. Mean knowledge scores were higher in the video group (76.20% vs. 69.3%; 90% CI for the difference, 2.8, 11.2). As the lower bound of the CI for the difference was higher than the lower equivalence boundary (-5%), we infer that the video was at least as effective as the counselor educational session. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an educational counseling video is a valid alternative for providing posttest education and prevention information during the waiting period associated with the 20-minute HIV rapid test. Without disruption in clinical flow, both testing and education can be accomplished in a meaningful way in a busy ED.


Subject(s)
Counseling/methods , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Patient Education as Topic , Videotape Recording , AIDS Serodiagnosis , Adult , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Female , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/transmission , Health Education , Humans , Male , Process Assessment, Health Care , Time Factors , Young Adult
5.
Sex Transm Dis ; 34(12): 1025-9, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18032992

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To test a model designed to increase willingness of patients presenting to the emergency department off hours to be tested for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) by using a pretest counseling video as a substitute for face-to-face counseling. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing the rate of testing in patients randomized to receive video counseling with immediate testing (video group) versus standard care, which was referral to counseling and testing the next day (standard referral group). RESULTS: Fifty percent of 805 eligible patients consented to participate in the study, indicating willingness to be tested. The HIV testing rate was higher in the video group 92.6% (187 of 202) than in the standard referral group 4.5% (9 of 202) (difference = 88.1%, 95% confidence interval: 83.5%-92.7%). Thirty percent of 187 patients in the video group who were tested returned for their results; 8 of 9 patients in standard care returned to be tested and to get their results. CONCLUSION: Half of the patients who were solicited for HIV testing agreed to be tested. When testing was immediate the patient was more likely to have the test completed.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , HIV Infections/diagnosis , Informed Consent/statistics & numerical data , Videotape Recording , Adult , Counseling , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Education as Topic , Treatment Outcome
6.
Ann Emerg Med ; 48(1): 21-7, 2006 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16781919

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Multiple barriers to traditional pretest HIV counseling make HIV testing difficult to accomplish in the emergency department setting in off hours. This study compares the educational effectiveness of a 10-minute pretest counseling video with the usual practice of a session with an HIV counselor. METHODS: This was a prospective randomized controlled trial of adult patients presenting to the urgent care area of a busy inner-city hospital. Patients either viewed an HIV educational video or spoke with an HIV counselor for pretest counseling. The video was developed by 2 of the investigators (YC, MH) and covered essential educational elements for HIV testing, as required by the New York State Department of Health. All participants completed a measure of HIV knowledge after their intervention. An equivalence analysis was performed to assess whether the video was at least as good as counseling in terms of overall mean knowledge score. RESULTS: Of 129 patients recruited for the study, 65 patients were randomized to the intervention and 64 patients to the control group. Five patients were unable to complete the study. The final analysis was based on 124 patients. Mean knowledge scores were higher in the intervention (85.3% versus 79.7%; 90% confidence interval for the difference 2.6% to 8.7%). CONCLUSION: We conclude that the use of an educational video with an inner-city adult population was at least as effective as in-person pretest counseling in conveying information related to HIV testing.


Subject(s)
Counseling/methods , Emergency Service, Hospital , HIV Infections/diagnosis , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Videotape Recording , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Poverty Areas , Prospective Studies , Urban Population
7.
Acad Emerg Med ; 12(12): 1221-6, 2005 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16293899

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare a brief screening tool with physicians' usual practice in detecting depressive symptoms in patients presenting with somatic complaints to an inner-city emergency department. Depression is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Underprivileged patients who rely on emergency departments for primary care remain at risk for undetected depression. METHODS: This prospective observational study included all patients older than 18 years presenting to an urgent care clinic staffed by emergency physicians in an urban public hospital during an eight-week period. Clinically unstable patients and those with a chief complaint of depression were excluded. After consenting, patients completed a previously validated two-question screening tool for depression. Patients identified as having depressive symptoms were referred to social workers for evaluation for possible psychiatric intervention. RESULTS: Of the 226 patients enrolled, 55% (124/226; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 48% to 61%) screened positive for depressive symptoms. Physicians identified 14% (31/226; 95% CI = 10% to 19%) as having depressive symptoms. The kappa value was 0.22 (95% CI = 0.14 to 0.29). All patients but one identified as positive by the physicians screened positive on the screening tool. Patients who screened positive were referred to social workers. The physicians failed to identify 19 of the patients who needed further psychiatric care. CONCLUSIONS: Depressive symptoms are common among patients in urgent care settings with somatic complaints. A simple screening tool identified more patients for further evaluation than does physicians' usual practice.


Subject(s)
Depression/diagnosis , Emergency Medicine/instrumentation , Emergency Medicine/methods , Mass Screening/instrumentation , Mass Screening/methods , Urban Population , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Female , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , New York City/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...