Modifier-assisted differential mobility-tandem mass spectrometry method for detection and quantification of amphetamine-type stimulants in urine.

An advantage of differential mobility spectrometry (DMS) is it provides an orthogonal mechanism to mass spectrometry (MS). The DMS-MS/MS detects analytes in the gas phase on the basis of differences in ion mobility in low and high electric fields, which makes DMS-MS/MS an alternative to chromatographic separation-MS. One drawback of DMS is its limited resolution and sensitivity, especially for detecting small molecules when using a nonpolar inert gas as the carrier gas. The present work has evaluated the effects on peak capacity of adding chemical modifiers to inert carrier gases (nitrogen, helium, argon and carbon dioxide). Use of a methanol-helium mixture gave improvements in both separation and sensitivity. Nine structurally similar amphetamine-type stimulants were determined in urine without pretreatment of the samples before analysis. After optimization of carrier gas, nature and concentration of chemical modifier, and DMS temperature, limits of detection ranging from 1.1 to 2.7 ng mL-1, with a linear range of three orders of magnitude (5-5000 ng mL-1) were achieved. Precision was <15% and the accuracy of the quality control samples was 87.6-113.7%. For the quantitation of urine samples from drug abusers, data obtained using DMS-MS/MS showed reasonable agreement (within ±19.5%) with that obtained using LC-MS/MS. The analysis time for DMS-MS/MS was only 1.1 min and a paired sample t-test between the two methods gave a p-value of 0.0894, which indicates that DMS-MS/MS is a reliable method, with comparable precision and sensitivity to LC-MS/MS.

Analysis of triazine herbicides using an up-and-down-shaker-assisted dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

In dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, a few hundred microliters to a few milliliters of water-miscible dispersive solvent are commonly used to assist emulsification in aqueous samples. In the present study, a consistent and automatic up-and-down-shaker-assisted dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (UDSA-DLLME) that does not require a dispersive solvent was developed. The enrichment factors (EFs) of the targets obtained using the automatic shaker were 361-1391 for UDSA-DLLME, 51-77 for ultrasonication, and 298-922 for vortexing. The linearity of the method was in the range 0.2-200µgL(-1), and its limit of detections was within 0.02-0.04µgL(-1). The intraday and interday relative standard deviations ranged from 5.7 to 10.0% and 5.5 to 10.3%, respectively. The relative recoveries of river and lake samples spiked with 2.0µgL(-1) of triazines were 94.2-102.2% and 98.5-104.1%, respectively. The technique provided high repeatability and recovery. No matrix interference from river and lake water was observed. The method also achieved high EFs compared with those obtained through other emulsification methods such as vortexing and ultrasonication. UDSA-DLLME is an alternative sample preparation technique with good performance.