ABSTRACT
The minimally invasive implantation of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) leads to excellent functional results, but due to the reduced intraoperative visibility the removal of excessive cement may be difficult. In a retrospective study we assessed radiologically the incidence of loose and excess bone cement in 120 UKAs and correlated it to the thickness of the tibial cement layer. In 25 cases loose or attached excess cement was seen. Two of these patients with loose cement bodies required revision surgery. An additional 2 patients not operated at our institution required revision because of pain and loss of motion. The average thickness of the tibial cement layer was 3.1 (1.7-5.0) mm in all the patients. But it was significantly higher in the group with excess cement bodies [3.3 (2.3-5.0) mm] compared to the group without excess cement [3.0 (1.7-4.1) mm] (P < 0.05). Symptomatic free cement bodies need to be removed immediately, if necessary arthroscopically, in order to avoid damage to the implants. To avoid this problem in minimally invasive UKA, intraoperative fluoroscopy, a dental mirror or a nerve hook seem to be useful tools to identify and remove loose or excess cement.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Bone Cements , Foreign Bodies/pathology , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Foreign Bodies/surgery , Humans , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Knee Joint/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Failure , Radiography , Reoperation , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
The implantation of a knee arthroplasty is still a demanding operation. There is still no "golden standard" available, although a lot of guidelines have been declared. Because of this fact this article should provide the radiologist with an overview of and some background knowledge for the radiological evaluation of knee arthroplasty.
Subject(s)
Knee Prosthesis , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Failure , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Osteoarthritis, Knee/diagnostic imaging , Radiography , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral osteoarthritis is generally considered a contraindication for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Therefore, even with an intact lateral compartment, bicondylar surface replacement is preferred when patellofemoral osteoarthritis is present, despite comparatively worse functional results. In the present study, the influence of patellofemoral osteoarthritis on the outcome of the Oxford III unicondylar implant was investigated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The HSS and the patella score according to Turba were used to retrospectively evaluate the outcome of 44 Oxford III unicondylar implants at an average follow-up of 35 months. The degree of patellofemoral osteoarthritis was radiographically graded according to the Sperner score. RESULTS: The HSS score improved to an average of 92.3 points (68-99; p<0.001 vs preoperative score). With the patella score, only good and very good results were observed. At follow-up examination almost 70% of the knees showed patellofemoral osteoarthritis of degree III-IV. No correlation was found between the functional scores and the degree of patellofemoral osteoarthritis. CONCLUSION: Radiographic patellofemoral osteoarthritis seems to have no influence on the functional outcome of the Oxford III unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Therefore, unicondylar surface replacement is indicated even with radiographic evidence of patellofemoral osteoarthritis, provided that it is clinically asymptomatic.
