Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ophthalmologe ; 113(12): 1051-1057, 2016 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27272632

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hygiene regulations must be taken into consideration for all diagnostic and therapeutic measures in order to avoid transfer of pathogens and infections. The Infection Protection Act assigns the responsibility for prevention of infections to managers of medical institutions, i.e. the owners of a practice and public health authorities are obligated to counsel and monitor medical institutions with respect to hygiene and prevention of infections. This article presents the results of the surveillance of all ophthalmological practices in Frankfurt am Main in 2012-2015, which are assessed and discussed against the background of the valid recommendations of the Committee for Hospital Hygiene (KRINKO). METHODS: Based on a checklist, all 35 ophthalmological practices in Frankfurt am Main received counseling and were monitored by an official from the Public Health Office. RESULTS: The basic principles of hygiene organization as well as the prerequisites for appropriate hand hygiene and surface disinfection were present in the majority of practices. In 11 practices (31.4 %) disposable medical products were exclusively utilized but medical products were prepared in-house in 24 practices (68.6 %). Contact pads for tonometry were prepared in-house in 13 (37.1 %) practices of which 6 were deficient so that improvements had to be implemented. In 6 out of the 7 practices where even critical medical products were prepared, this preparation was prohibited due to significant errors and the practices had to switch to disposable materials. DISCUSSION: In total, the practices could be certified as having a good general level of hygiene; however, in some cases major errors were found in the preparation of medical products, which had to be immediately corrected.


Subject(s)
Checklist/standards , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Hand Hygiene/standards , Infection Control/standards , Ophthalmologists/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Checklist/statistics & numerical data , Disinfection/standards , Disinfection/statistics & numerical data , Germany , Guideline Adherence/standards , Hand Hygiene/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Surveys , Infection Control/statistics & numerical data , Ophthalmologists/standards , Ophthalmology/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data
2.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25862417

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In addition to hand hygiene and reprocessing of medical products, cleaning and disinfection of surfaces is also an important issue in the prevention of germ transmission and by implication infections. Therefore, in 2014, the quality of the structure, process and result of surface preparation of all hospitals in Frankfurt am Main, Germany, was monitored. METHODS: All 17 hospitals transferred information on the quality of structure. Process quality was obtained through direct observation during cleaning and disinfection of rooms and their plumbing units. Result quality was gained using the fluorescent method, i.e. marking surfaces with a fluorescent liquid and testing if this mark has been sufficiently removed by cleaning. RESULTS: Structure quality: in all hospitals the employees were trained regularly. In 12 of them, the foremen had the required qualifications, in 6 hospitals unclarity as to the intersection of the cleaning and care services remained. In 14 hospitals only visible contamination was cleaned on the weekends, whereas complete cleaning was reported to take place in 12 hospitals on Saturdays and in 2 hospitals on Sundays. The contractually stipulated cleaning (observations specified in brackets) averaged 178 m(2)/h (148 m(2)/h) per patient room and 69 m(2)/h (33 m(2)/h) for bathrooms. Process quality: during process monitoring, various hand contact surfaces were prepared insufficiently. Result quality: 63 % of fluorescent markings were appropriately removed. CONCLUSION: The need for improvement is given especially in the area of the qualification of the foremen and a in a clear definition of the intersection between cleaning and care services, as well as in the regulations for weekends and public holidays.


Subject(s)
Disinfection/statistics & numerical data , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/microbiology , Hospitals, Urban/statistics & numerical data , Process Assessment, Health Care , Sterilization/statistics & numerical data , Disinfection/standards , Equipment Failure Analysis/methods , Equipment Failure Analysis/standards , Germany , Hospitals, Urban/standards , Quality Control , Sterilization/standards , Surface Properties
3.
Z Gastroenterol ; 52(12): 1402-7, 2014 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25474279

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Endoscopy is an important part of modern medical diagnostics and therapy. The invasive procedures are however associated with a risk to transmit infections. Against this background the KRINKO has published the "Hygienic requirements for the reprocessing of flexible endoscopes and endoscopic accessories" in 2002 and has updated these recommendations in 2012. In 2003 and 2013 all gastroenterological facilities in Frankfurt am Main using flexible endoscopes were monitored for compliance with the recommendations. METHODS: The inspections were performed after prior notice by a staff member of the health authority using a checklist which had been developed on the basis of the current KRINKO recommendations. RESULTS: In both years all institutions performing endoscopic procedures were visited: 2003 15 hospitals and 23 practices; 2013 14 clinics and 10 practices. In 2013 (data for 2003 in brackets) 100 % (93 %) of the hospitals and 60 % (22 %) of practices reprocessed their endoscopes by automated methods. The appropriate reprocessing and filling of water bottles for rinsing the scope channels with sterile water and the sterilisation of accessories were satisfactorily performed in 2003 and 2013 by all hospitals. However in 2013 only 90 % (2003: 74 %) of the practices correctly reprocessed water bottles and 80 % (52 %) used sterile water for filling the bottle. In 2013 100 % (2003: 57 %) of the practices correctly sterilised accessory instruments, while 2 practices used disposable, i. e., single-use materials. In 2013 all institutions performed microbiological tests according to KRINKO recommendations, while in 2003 all hospitals but only 43 % of the practices could present such tests. DISCUSSION: While the gastroenterological departments of Frankfurt hospitals already complied with the KRINKO recommendations in 2003, the inspection of several practices in 2003 had revealed considerable shortcomings in the implementation of these recommendations. Subsequently the practices have improved their hygiene management.


Subject(s)
Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal/microbiology , Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal/statistics & numerical data , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Equipment Contamination/statistics & numerical data , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Hygiene/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Endoscopes, Gastrointestinal/standards , Endoscopy , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Gastroenterology/standards , Germany , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Process Assessment, Health Care/methods , Sterilization
4.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23114448

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: : The German Commission on Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention has published several recommendations regarding hygiene in the intensive care unit. Compliance with these recommendations was surveyed. METHODS: In 2005 and 2011, the intensive care units of all hospitals in Frankfurt am Main, Germany, were examined by members of the public health department, using a checklist based on the respective recommendations. RESULTS: Recommendations on the architecture and function of intensive care wards were almost fully complied with, except for the stipulated amount of space and nursing personnel. Compliance with recommendations for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia and for prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections was excellent, with only some minor exceptions. Regarding hand hygiene, in 2011 fewer faults were documented than in 2005. All hospitals took part in the German project of the world-wide campaign "clean care is safer care." In 2005, device-associated infections were surveyed in 92% intensive care units, and in 2011 in all of them. By 2011, screening of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus had been established in all intensive care units. CONCLUSION: Most problems that were observed regarded a scarcity of space and of facilities for isolation of patients and of nursing personnel. Improvements were seen in hand hygiene and in screening for multidrug resistant organisms (MDRO).


Subject(s)
Communicable Disease Control/methods , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Hygiene/standards , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/standards , Intensive Care Units/standards , Bacteremia/prevention & control , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Checklist , Communicable Disease Control/organization & administration , Cross Infection/transmission , Germany , Guideline Adherence/organization & administration , Hand Disinfection/standards , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/organization & administration , Mass Screening/organization & administration , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , Staphylococcal Infections/transmission
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...