Mechanism of awareness of hypoglycemia. Perception of neurogenic (predominantly cholinergic) rather than neuroglycopenic symptoms.

We sought 1) to determine which symptoms of hypoglycemia are reproducible, 2) to pharmacologically distinguish neurogenic (autonomic) from neuroglycopenic symptoms, and 3) to test the hypothesis that awareness of hypoglycemia is the result of perception of neurogenic rather than neuroglycopenic symptoms. Awareness of hypoglycemia and 19 symptoms were quantitated in 10 normal, young adults, each studied on four occasions in random sequence, during 1) clamped euglycemia (approximately 5 mM), 2) clamped hypoglycemia (approximately 2.5 mM), 3) clamped hypoglycemia with combined alpha- and beta-adrenergic blockade (phentolamine and propranolol), and 4) clamped hypoglycemia with pan-autonomic blockade (phentolamine, propranolol and atropine). Significant (ANOVA, P < 0.001) treatment effects on the awareness of hypoglycemia ("blood sugar low") were noted. No change occurred in the score for this during euglycemia, but the mean +/- SE increase was 2.1 +/- 0.4 during hypoglycemia. This increase was not reduced significantly by adrenergic blockade (1.6 +/- 0.5), but was reduced significantly and substantially (approximately 70%) by pan-autonomic blockade (0.6 +/- 0.3). Significant neurogenic symptoms included shaky/tremulous (P < 0.001), heart pounding (P < 0.001), and nervous/anxious (P = 0.002), all adrenergic; and sweaty (P < 0.001), hungry (P < 0.001), and tingling (P = 0.009), all cholinergic. Significant neuroglycopenic symptoms, those produced by hypoglycemia but not reduced by pan-autonomic blockade, included warm (P < 0.001), weak (P = 0.011), difficulty thinking/confused (P = 0.004), and tired/drowsy (P = 0.003). We conclude that muscarinic cholinergic mechanisms mediate an important and previously uncharacterized component of the neurogenic symptoms of hypoglycemia and awareness of hypoglycemia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Failure of nocturnal hypoglycemia to cause daytime hyperglycemia in patients with IDDM.

To test the hypothesis that nocturnal hypoglycemia causes postprandial hyperglycemia the next day (the Somogyi phenomenon) in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), we studied 10 moderately well controlled patients, who were on their usual therapeutic regimens, from 2000 to 2000 on three occasions. On a control day, samples were obtained without intervention. On another day, nocturnal hypoglycemia was prevented (by intravenous infusion of glucose, if necessary, from 2200 to 0400 to keep plasma glucose levels at greater than 5.6 mM). On another day, nocturnal hypoglycemia was induced (by stepped intravenous insulin infusions between 2200 and 0200 to reduce plasma glucose levels to less than 2.8 mM). After nocturnal hypoglycemia (1.9 +/- 0.2 mM), fasting (0800), morning (0800-1100), afternoon (1200-1500), evening (1600-2000), and entire-day (0800-2000) plasma glucose concentrations were no higher than those after prevention of nocturnal hypoglycemia or sampling only. On the control day, fasting and daytime plasma glucose levels were directly related to the preceding 2200 (r = 0.723, P less than 0.02, and r = 0.762, P = 0.01, respectively) and nocturnal nadir (r = 0.714, P less than 0.02, and r = 0.728, P less than 0.02) plasma glucose concentrations. Daytime plasma glucose levels were unrelated to peak nocturnal plasma glucagon, epinephrine, norepinephrine, growth hormone, or cortisol concentrations. We conclude that nocturnal hypoglycemia does not appear to cause clinically important daytime hyperglycemia in patients representative of most patients with IDDM.

Failure of nocturnal hypoglycemia to cause fasting hyperglycemia in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

To test the hypothesis that nocturnal hypoglycemia causes fasting hyperglycemia (the Somogyi phenomenon) in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, we studied 10 patients, who were on their usual therapeutic regimens, from 10 p.m. through 8 a.m. on three nights. On the first night, only a control procedure was performed (blood sampling only); on the second night, hypoglycemia was prevented (by intravenous glucose infusion, if necessary, to keep plasma glucose levels above 100 mg per deciliter [5.6 mmol per liter]); and on the third night, hypoglycemia was induced (by stepped intravenous insulin infusions between midnight and 4 a.m. to keep plasma glucose levels below 50 mg per deciliter [2.8 mmol per liter]). After nocturnal hypoglycemia was induced (36 +/- 2 mg per deciliter [2.0 +/- 0.1 mmol per liter] [mean +/- SE] from 2 to 4:30 a.m.), 8 a.m. plasma glucose concentrations (113 +/- 18 mg per deciliter [6.3 +/- 1.0 mmol per liter]) were not higher than values obtained after hypoglycemia was prevented (182 +/- 14 mg per deciliter [10.1 +/- 0.8 mmol per liter]) or those obtained after blood sampling only (149 +/- 20 mg per deciliter [8.3 +/- 1.1 mmol per liter]). Indeed, regression analysis of data obtained on the control night indicated that the 8 a.m. plasma glucose concentration was directly related to the nocturnal glucose nadir (r = 0.761, P = 0.011). None of the patients was awakened by hypoglycemia. Scores for symptoms of hypoglycemia, which were determined at 8 a.m., did not differ significantly among the three studies. We conclude that asymptomatic nocturnal hypoglycemia does not appear to cause clinically important fasting hyperglycemia in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus on their usual therapeutic regimens.

Nocturnal hypoglycemia does not commonly result in major morning hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes mellitus.

We analyzed 216 overnight blood glucose profiles (samples at 2100, 0300, and 0700 h) in 75 consecutive patients with diabetes mellitus primarily to assess the impact of nocturnal hypoglycemia on morning hyperglycemia and secondarily to assess the frequency and magnitude of a night-to-morning increase in glucose levels in a clinical context. A dawn phenomenon (an 0300 to 0700 h increment in blood glucose) was rather uncommon in our patients (about one-third of profiles), was readily demonstrable in groups of patients only when nocturnal glucose levels were low (less than or equal to 50 mg/dl) or normal (51-100 mg/dl), and was generally not of great magnitude (mean 0700 h glucose levels of 114 mg/dl after 0300 h values of less than or equal to 100 mg/dl). Nocturnal hypoglycemia (0300 h blood glucose of less than or equal to 50 mg/dl, 7% of profiles) was followed by significant increments in blood glucose. However, the 0700 h glucose values averaged only 113 mg/dl and ranged up to only 172 mg/dl. Clearly, the magnitude of this Somogyi phenomenon was not great. Mean glucose levels were not higher at 1100, 1600, or 2100 h the day after nocturnal hypoglycemia than those at the same times the day before hypoglycemia. Thus, nocturnal hypoglycemia does not commonly result in major morning, or daytime, hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes mellitus sampled while using their usual therapeutic regimens.