Complication rates of resident-performed cataract surgery: Impact of early introduction of cataract surgery training.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of the early introduction of cataract surgery training on the complication rates of resident-performed cataract surgery. SETTING: University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: Two classes of ophthalmology residents were examined, one class with a late introduction of cataract surgery and one with an early introduction of cataract surgery. All cataract cases in which residents acted as primary surgeon were included. Patient charts were reviewed to collect data on patient characteristics, surgical details, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The late-introduction cohort comprised 3 residents who performed 540 cataract cases, all during their final year of residency. The early-introduction cohort comprised 4 residents who performed 780 cataract cases beginning in the first year of residency. The late-introduction cohort had higher rates of major intraoperative complications than the early-introduction cohort (8.5% versus 3.1%) and of anterior vitrectomy (7.6% versus 2.1%) (both P < .001). Examination of the anterior vitrectomy rate as a function of experience showed the early-introduction cohort had a stable anterior vitrectomy rate of 1% to 2% throughout training, while the late-introduction cohort had a peak anterior vitrectomy rate of 12% at approximately case 20. Multivariable regression analysis showed the early-introduction cohort was independently associated with a lower rate of anterior vitrectomy (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.66) after adjusting for differences in patient characteristics and surgical complexity. CONCLUSIONS: Early introduction of cataract surgery training significantly decreased the rate of major intraoperative complications, specifically anterior vitrectomy, in resident-performed cataract surgeries.

Optimizing outcomes of multifocal intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To update the readers on recent research for further optimizing outcomes and improving the patient satisfaction with multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies provide few novel approaches on surgical interventions to improve the postoperative outcomes. The use of capsular tension rings can improve preoperative predictability, whereas femtosecond laser cataract surgery was not shown to provide significant benefit to postoperative visual acuity. Other studies broaden and reinforce the previously reported results, such as patient education with blurred vision and dysphotopsia, utilizing an add power of +3.00 to improve intermediate visual acuity, and minimizing the lens decentration and tilt. SUMMARY: Multifocal IOLs are currently a popular lens choice for motivated patients who would like to achieve spectacle independence. However, recent research has not provided significant improvements in optimizing outcomes. Newer lens technologies may be required to resolve the current problems of blurred vision and dysphotopsias.

Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (Lasik) versus wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (Prk): a prospective randomized eye-to-eye comparison (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and efficacy of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) vs photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in a prospective randomized clinical trial. METHODS: A cohort of 68 eyes of 34 patients with -0.75 to -8.13 diopters (D) of myopia (spherical equivalent) were randomized to receive either wavefront-guided PRK or LASIK in the fellow eye using the VISX CustomVue laser. Patients were evaluated at 1 day, 1 week, and months 1, 3, 6, and 12. RESULTS: At 1 month, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), 5% and 25% contrast sensitivity, induction of higher-order aberrations (HOAs), and subjective symptoms of vision clarity, vision fluctuation, ghosting, and overall self-assessment of vision were worse (P<0.05) in the PRK group. By 3 months, these differences had resolved (P>0.05). At 1 year, mean spherical equivalent was reduced 94% to -0.27 ± 0.31 D in the LASIK group and reduced 96% to -0.17 ± 0.41 D in the PRK group. At 1 year, 91% of eyes were within ±0.50 D and 97 % were within ±1.0 D in the PRK group. At 1 year, 88% of eyes were within ±0.50 D and 97% were within ±1.0 D in the LASIK group. At 1 year, 97% of eyes in the PRK group and 94% of eyes in the LASIK group achieved an UCVA of 20/20 or better (P=0.72). Refractive stability was achieved in both PRK and LASIK groups after 1 month. There were no intraoperative or postoperative flap complications in the LASIK group. There were no instances of corneal haze in the PRK group. CONCLUSIONS: Wavefront-guided LASIK and PRK are safe and effective at reducing myopia. At 1 month postoperatively, LASIK demonstrates an advantage over PRK in UCVA, BSCVA, low-contrast acuity, induction of total HOAs, and several subjective symptoms. At postoperative month 3, these differences between PRK and LASIK results had resolved.

Laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement for consecutive hyperopia after myopic overcorrection.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy, predictability, and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for the treatment of consecutive hyperopia after myopic LASIK. SETTING: Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA. METHODS: In a retrospective study, 36 eyes of 30 patients with consecutive hyperopia after myopic LASIK had LASIK retreatment using the VISX S2 excimer laser. Primary outcome variables including uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction, complications, and vector analysis were evaluated preoperatively and 1 day and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean spherical equivalent decreased from +1.52 diopters (D) +/- 0.55 (SD) (range +0.63 to +2.63 D) preoperatively to -0.10 +/- 0.52 D (range -1.25 to +1.50 D) 3 months after retreatment. The UCVA was 20/20 or better in 24 eyes (66.7%) and 20/40 or better in 34 eyes (94.4%). Twenty eyes (55.5%) were within +/-0.5 D of the intended correction and 34 eyes (94.4%), within +/-1.0 D. No eye lost 2 or more lines of BSCVA. One eye (2.8%) developed diffuse lamellar keratitis that resolved without sequelae, and 2 eyes (5.6%) developed nonprogressive epithelial ingrowth that did not require removal. CONCLUSIONS: Laser in situ keratomileusis retreatment for consecutive hyperopia following myopic LASIK was an effective, predictable, and safe procedure. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess stability.