Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Pain ; 26(4): 771-785, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35090077

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Evidence for perioperative methods to prevent persistent postsurgical pain (PPP) is uncertain, in part because few treatments have been directly compared. Here we have used component network meta-analysis (cNMA) to incorporate both direct and indirect evidence in the evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological and neural block treatments. DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT: We searched the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, Embase, MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry up to January 2021 for randomized, double-masked, controlled trials that reported the prevalence of PPP. We assessed trial quality with the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2.0). We analysed the results with frequentist cNMA models. The primary outcome was the relative risk (RR) of PPP. We assessed efficacy in relation to a clinically important effect size of RR = 0.9, which is a 10% improvement with treatment. RESULTS: The analysis included 107 trials (13,553 participants) of 13 treatments. The effects of complex interventions were the multiplicative effects of their components. Compared with placebo, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), neural block alone, or in combination with NMDA receptor blockers or gabapentanoids were effective. Treatments with benefit in the immediate post-operative period predicted a reduced risk of PPP. CONCLUSIONS: Several treatments and treatment combinations effectively reduce PPP prevalence. Pain outcomes in the immediate postoperative period are an important mediator of PPP. Multimodal interventions can be analysed using cNMA. SIGNIFICANCE: Systematic reviews of PPP prevention usually focus on the efficacy of specific treatments in comparison with control interventions. In this study we used component network meta-analysis to compare interventions to each other, including both pharmacological and neural block techniques, and multimodal interventions. Interventions that are not effective alone may improve the efficacy of multimodal interventions that include neural block techniques. Immediate postoperative benefit was an important mediator for reduction of PPP. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42018085570 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.


Subject(s)
Nerve Block , Pain, Postoperative , Humans , Nerve Block/methods , Network Meta-Analysis , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors
2.
Neurosurgery ; 85(2): 189-198, 2019 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30265333

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the potential for faster postoperative recovery and the ease of direct intraoperative injection, intrathecal morphine is rarely provided in lumbar spine surgery. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intrathecal morphine following lumbar fusion. METHODS: We randomly assigned 150 patients undergoing elective instrumented lumbar fusion to receive a single intrathecal injection of morphine (0.2 mg) or placebo (normal saline) immediately prior to wound closure. The primary outcome was pain on the visual-analogue scale during the first 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included respiratory depression, treatment-related side effects, postoperative opioid requirements, and length of hospital stay. An intention-to-treat, repeated-measures analysis was used to estimate outcomes according to treatment in the primary analysis. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were similar. Intrathecal morphine reduced pain both at rest (32% area under the curves [AUCs] difference, P < .01) and with movement (22% AUCs difference, P < .02) during the initial 24 h after surgery. The risk of respiratory depression was not increased by intrathecal morphine (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.44 to 1.68; P = .66). Although postoperative opioid requirements were reduced with intrathecal morphine (P < .03), lengths of hospital stay were similar (P = .32). Other than a trend towards increased intermittent catheterization among patients assigned to intrathecal morphine (P = .09), treatment-related side effects did not significantly differ. The early benefits of intrathecal morphine on postoperative pain were no longer apparent after 48 h. CONCLUSION: A single intrathecal injection of 0.2 mg of morphine safely reduces postoperative pain following lumbar fusion.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Morphine/administration & dosage , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Injections, Spinal , Male , Middle Aged , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...