Routine laboratory testing in hemodialysis: how frequently is it needed?

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis patients are followed by routine laboratory testing. There is uncertainty whether these tests always lead to a change in decision-making. This study aims to discover the number of yearly interventions/changes in prescription based on these tests and depict the group of patients who would benefit from reduced or increased laboratory blood tests. METHODS: This is a multi-center retrospective study that included patients on hemodialysis for more than one year. Laboratory data collected included yearly average of hemoglobin, urea reduction ratio (URR), serum phosphate, calcium, potassium, parathormone (PTH), ferritin and transferrin saturation (TSAT); changes in prescription of erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs), intravenous (IV) iron, alfacalcidol, phosphate binders and dialysis parameters were retrieved from medical records. A multivariate regression analysis assessed factors associated with high number of interventions. RESULTS: A total of 210 hemodialysis patients were included: 62.4% males, 47.1% diabetics. Their median age was 72 (62,78.5) years. Their laboratory parameters were within KDIGO targets. The median number of yearly interventions was 5 (3,7) for ESAs, 4 (2,6) for IV iron, 1 (0,2.25) for phosphate binders, 0 (0,1) for alfacalcidol. Based on the multivariate analysis, patients with higher ferritin, frequent changes in ESA, more changes in alfacalcidol and higher PTH had higher number of prescription's changes in ESA, IV iron, phosphate binders and alfacalcidol respectively. CONCLUSION: While maintaining KDIGO targets, therapeutic interventions following routine laboratory testing did not exceed six times yearly for all parameters. This suggests that a reduced testing frequency in hemodialysis patients is possible without any impact on quality of care. A personalized approach remains safe for hemodialysis patients while reducing the cost. This is very relevant in low-resource settings and during economic crises and needs to be evaluated in prospective studies.

Factors predictive of anti-spike antibody titers after COVID-19 vaccination in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis (HD) patients have a high prevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and mortality, but they may have a weak response to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate factors predictive of humoral response in HD patients vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 infection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a 2-center observational study including HD patients who received the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine followed by serological measurements 20 days and 4 weeks after the 1st and 2nd dose, respectively. Healthy controls were included. Anti-spike antibody was measured using the chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) method. The quantile regression analysis was performed to assess factors associated with anti-spike antibody titers. RESULTS: Seventy-two HD patients and 22 healthy controls were included. Mean age of dialysis patients and controls was 72.5 ±11.5 years and 45.7 ±17.4 years, respectively. In the HD group, median levels of anti-spike antibody were 3 (interquartile range (IQR): 0.5-26) UI/mL and 391 (IQR: 55-1642) UI/mL after the 1st and 2nd dose, respectively, with response rates of 62.5% and 96.7%. The median level of the anti-spike antibody after the 1st dose in previously infected patients was 8571 (IQR: 2586-19147) UI/mL. There was a significant correlation between anti-spike antibody levels after the 2nd dose and age and anti-hepatitis B surface (HBs) antibody and serum albumin levels (Spearman's rho: r = -0.289, p < 0.001; r = 0.357, p = 0.027; r = 0.317; p = 0.026, respectively). The regression analysis showed a significant association of previous infection and anti-Hbs antibody level with anti-spike antibody level after the 1st dose of vaccine (p < 0.001). After a 5-month follow-up, 2 vaccinated patients contracted COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a response rate of 96.7% to 2 doses of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in HD patients and 100% to a single dose in previously infected patients. The level of anti-spike antibody can be predicted by age, anti-Hbs antibodies, serum albumin, and previous infection. Despite the immunization of patients, preventive measures should be maintained in all dialysis units.

Erythropoietin in Acute Kidney Injury (EAKI): a pragmatic randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with erythropoietin is well established for anemia in chronic kidney disease patients but not well studied in acute kidney injury. METHODS: This is a multicenter, randomized, pragmatic controlled clinical trial. It included 134 hospitalized patients with anemia defined as hemoglobin < 11 g/dL and acute kidney injury defined as an increase of serum creatinine of ≥ 0.3 mg/dL within 48 h or 1.5 times baseline. One arm received recombinant human erythropoietin 4000 UI subcutaneously every other day (intervention; n = 67) and the second received standard of care (control; n = 67) during the hospitalization until discharge or death. The primary outcome was the need for transfusion; secondary outcomes were death, renal recovery, need for dialysis. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in transfusion need (RR = 1.05, 95%CI 0.65,1.68; p = 0.855), in renal recovery full or partial (RR = 0.96, 95%CI 0.81,1.15; p = 0.671), in need for dialysis (RR = 11.00, 95%CI 0.62, 195.08; p = 0.102) or in death (RR = 1.43, 95%CI 0.58,3.53; p = 0.440) between the erythropoietin and the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Erythropoietin treatment had no impact on transfusions, renal recovery or mortality in acute kidney injury patients with anemia. The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03401710, 17/01/2018).

Analysis of Survival of Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Imatinib in the Last 15 Years in Lebanon.

BACKGROUND: In the 2000s, the introduction of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), imatinib, improved the survival outcomes of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In Lebanon, we rapidly adopted this treatment strategy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study reporting the survival rates of Lebanese CML patients. We examined the rates of major molecular response (MMR) and complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and analyzed the overall survival, progression-free survival, and event-free survival of CML patients treated with front-line imatinib in 3 university hospitals in Lebanon. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 46 patients diagnosed with CML and treated with front-line imatinib 400 mg/day from 2000 and followed up to 2015. In all patients, initially, 2 diagnostic tests were performed: cytogenetic analysis and qualitative molecular testing of the BCR-ABL transcript. The male-to-female sex ratio was 3:1. The median age at diagnosis was 49 years, and the mean age was 44.52 years. At diagnosis, 46 patients were in the chronic phase. All patients started imatinib 400 mg/day. Of the 46 patients, 35 had a typical karyotype, 8 an atypical karyotype, and 3 hypoploidism. RESULTS: The MMR rate at 18 months was 58.69%. The cumulative CCyR rate at 18 months of therapy with imatinib at the standard dose was 67.39%. The event-free survival rate was 75.86% and 74.14% at 5 and 8 years, respectively. The progression-free survival rate was 77.59% and 75.86% at 5 and 8 years, respectively. The overall survival rate was 98.27% and 98.27% at 5 and 8 years, respectively. Of the 46 patients, 12 developed disease progression and were salvaged by second-generation TKIs. These 12 patients were still alive with a MMR. CONCLUSION: In our study population, the achievement of a MMR and CCyR and overall survival, progression-free survival, and event-free survival were similar to previous published data. Reaching high survival rates with a first-generation TKI in a country with limited resources is a reasonable treatment approach for CML patients.

Adherence to Monitoring Tests in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Lebanon.

The present study was performed to determine whether the adherence to regular follow-up assessments using standardized real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and/or cytogenetic tests in Lebanese patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) meet the European LeukemiaNet recommendations. The present study was a retrospective analysis of 34 patients diagnosed with chronic phase CML who had been treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and monitored with regular cytogenetic tests and/or measurement of the BCR-ABL transcript level at 3, 6, and 12 months from 2006 until 2015 in 3 university hospitals in Lebanon. All patients were included and monitored in an adherence program (SAWA program). The male/female ratio was 3:1. The median age was 50 years, and the mean age was 50 years. As frontline treatment, 29 patients started imatinib and 5 patients received second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We defined compliance to the monitoring tests as regulary realizing the qPCR at 3, 6, and 12 months. Of the 36 patients, 15 underwent the recommended tests at 3, 6, and 12 months, representing a compliance rate of 41.6%; 28 of the 34 patients underwent the recommended tests only twice in the first follow-up year. Only 14 patients underwent qPCR at 3 months. We believe that despite the inclusion of our patients in an adherence program, the compliance rate is still low. We also believe that greater effort is required to improve the adherence to regular follow-up examinations.