An international study of the quality of national-level guidelines on driving with medical illness.

BACKGROUND: Medical illnesses are associated with a modest increase in crash risk, although many individuals with acute or chronic conditions may remain safe to drive, or pose only temporary risks. Despite the extensive use of national guidelines about driving with medical illness, the quality of these guidelines has not been formally appraised. AIM: To systematically evaluate the quality of selected national guidelines about driving with medical illness. DESIGN: A literature search of bibliographic databases and Internet resources was conducted to identify the guidelines, each of which was formally appraised. METHODS: Eighteen physicians or researchers from Canada, Australia, Ireland, USA and UK appraised nine national guidelines, applying the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. RESULTS: Relative strengths were found in AGREE II scores for the domains of scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement and clarity of presentation. However, all guidelines were given low ratings on rigour of development, applicability and documentation of editorial independence. Overall quality ratings ranged from 2.25 to 5.00 out of 7.00, with modifications recommended for 7 of the guidelines. Intra-class coefficients demonstrated fair to excellent appraiser agreement (0.57-0.79). CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first systematic evaluation of national-level guidelines for determining medical fitness to drive. There is substantive variability in the quality of these guidelines, and rigour of development was a relative weakness. There is a need for rigorous, empirically derived guidance for physicians and licensing authorities when assessing driving in the medically ill.

Medical education on fitness to drive: a survey of all UK medical schools.

AIM: To identify the extent to which medical aspects of fitness to drive (FTD) are taught within UK medical schools. METHODS: A survey of all 32 UK medical schools. In-depth interviews with a range of staff at two medical schools; telephone survey of 30 schools. RESULTS: Two thirds of schools reported specific teaching on medical aspects of FTD but few covered it in any depth or in relation to specific medical conditions. Only one school taught FTD in relation to elderly medicine. FTD was an examination topic at only 12 schools. CONCLUSION: Teaching on FTD is inconsistent across UK medical schools. Many new doctors will graduate with limited knowledge of medical aspects of FTD.

Severe head injury in children: emergency access to neurosurgery in the United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the scale of acute neurosurgery for severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in childhood, and whether surgical evacuation for haematoma is achieved within four hours of presentation to an emergency department. METHODS: A 12 month audit of emergency access to all specialist neurosurgical and intensive care services in the UK. Severe TBI in a child was defined as that necessitating admission to intensive care. RESULTS: Of 448 children with severe head injuries, 91 (20.3%) underwent emergency neurosurgery, and 37% of these surgical patients had at least one non-reactive and dilated pupil. An acute subdural or epidural haematoma was present in 143/448 (31.9%) children, of whom 66 (46.2%) underwent surgery. Children needing surgical evacuation of haematoma were at a median distance of 29 km (interquartile range (IQR) 11.8-45.7) from their neurosurgical centre. One in four children took longer than one hour to reach hospital after injury. Once in an accident and emergency department, 41% took longer than fours hours to arrive at the regional centre. The median interval between time of accident and arrival at the surgical centre was 4.5 hours (IQR 2.23-7.73), and 79% of inter-hospital transfers were undertaken by the referring hospital rather than the regional centre. In cases where the regional centre undertook the transfer, none were completed within four hours of presentation-the median interval was 6.3 hours (IQR 5.1-8.12). CONCLUSIONS: The system of care for severely head injured children in the UK does not achieve surgical evacuation of a significant haematoma within four hours. The recommendation to use specialist regional paediatric transfer teams delays rather than expedites the emergency service.

Saint or sinner? Teacher perceptions of a child with traumatic brain injury.

PURPOSE: To examine influences on classroom performance and behaviour following traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: A case-study of one child who suffered a moderate TBI, with frontal brain damage, aged 8, followed up at ages 12 and 13 years. Parents and child were interviewed to establish pre- and post-injury behaviour and functioning. All 19 teachers who taught the child reported on classroom performance, behaviour and educational achievement in each of their subjects. The child completed a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment battery including the Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-III(UK)), Children's Memory Scale (CMS) and Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scales (VABS). RESULTS: This child demonstrated above-average intelligence and good attention/concentration on the CMS. However, he was unable to focus or maintain attention in most classroom situations. His behaviour was erratic and disruptive in class and at home. At 5-year follow-up, his behaviour had deteriorated in both home and school situations, particularly in less structured environments. CONCLUSIONS: Teachers of more structured subjects (maths and science) perceived the child as excitable but performing at average or above-average levels, whereas teachers of less structured subjects (art, drama, music) perceived him to be 'attention-seeking' and very disruptive in class. The influences of environmental factors are discussed.

Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in children receiving intensive care in the UK.

AIMS: To describe the epidemiology of children with traumatic brain injury (TBI) admitted to paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in the UK. METHODS: Prospective collection of clinical and demographic information from paediatric and adult intensive care units in the UK and Eire between February 2001 and August 2003. RESULTS: The UK prevalence rate for children (0-14 years) admitted to intensive care with TBI between February 2001 and August 2003 was 5.6 per 100,000 population per year (95% Poisson exact confidence intervals 5.17 to 6.05). Children admitted to PICUs with TBI were more deprived than the population as a whole (mean Townsend score for TBI admissions 1.19 v 0). The commonest mechanism of injury was a pedestrian accident (36%), most often occurring in children over 10. There was a significant summer peak in admissions in children under 10 years. Time of injury peaked in the late afternoon and early evening, a pattern that remained constant across the days of the week. Injuries involving motor vehicles have the highest mortality rates (23% of vehicle occupants, 12% of pedestrians) compared with cyclists (8%) and falls (3%). In two thirds of admissions (65%) TBI was an isolated injury. CONCLUSIONS: TBI in children requiring intensive care is more common in those from poorer backgrounds who have been involved in accidents as pedestrians. The summer peak in injury occurrence for 0-10 year olds and late afternoon timing give clear targets for community based injury prevention.

Outcomes following childhood head injury: a population study.

OBJECTIVES: To identify outcomes following head injury (HI) among a population of children admitted to one hospital centre and to compare outcomes between different severity groups. METHODS: A postal follow up of children admitted with HI to one National Health Service Trust, between 1992 and 1998, was carried out. Children were aged 5-15 years at injury (mean 9.8), followed up at a mean of 2.2 years post-injury. Parents of 526 injured children (419 mild, 58 moderate, 49 severe) and 45 controls completed questionnaires. Outcomes were assessed using the King's Outcome Scale for Childhood Head Injury (KOSCHI). RESULTS: Frequent behavioural, emotional, memory, and attention problems were reported by one third of the severe group, one quarter of the moderate, and 10-18% of the mild. Personality change since HI was reported for 148 children (28%; 21% mild HI, 46% moderate, 69% severe). There was a significant relationship between injury severity and KOSCHI outcomes. Following the HI, 252 (48%) had moderate disability (43% mild HI, 64% moderate, 69% severe), while 270 (51%) made a good recovery (57% mild HI, 36% moderate, 22% severe). There was a significant association between social deprivation and poor outcome (p = 0.002). Only 30% (158) of children received hospital follow up after the HI. All children with severe disability received appropriate follow up, but 64% of children with moderate disability received none. No evidence was found to suggest a threshold of injury severity below which the risk of late sequelae could be safely discounted. CONCLUSIONS: Children admitted with mild HI may be at risk of poor outcomes, but often do not receive routine hospital follow up. A postal questionnaire combined with the KOSCHI to assess outcomes after HI may be used to identify children who would benefit from clinical assessment. Further research is needed to identify factors that place children with mild HI at risk of late morbidity.

Return to school after brain injury.

AIMS: To examine return to school and classroom performance following traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: This cross-sectional study set in the community comprised a group of 67 school-age children with TBI (35 mild, 13 moderate, 19 severe) and 14 uninjured matched controls. Parents and children were interviewed and children assessed at a mean of 2 years post injury. Teachers reported on academic performance and educational needs. The main measures used were classroom performance, the Children's Memory Scale (CMS), the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-third edition UK (WISC-III) and the Weschler Objective Reading Dimensions (WORD). RESULTS: One third of teachers were unaware of the TBI. On return to school, special arrangements were made for 18 children (27%). Special educational needs were identified for 16 (24%), but only six children (9%) received specialist help. Two thirds of children with TBI had difficulties with school work, half had attention/concentration problems and 26 (39%) had memory problems. Compared to other pupils in the class, one third of children with TBI were performing below average. On the CMS, one third of the severe group were impaired/borderline for immediate and delayed recall of verbal material, and over one quarter were impaired/borderline for general memory. Children in the severe group had a mean full-scale IQ significantly lower than controls. Half the TBI group had a reading age > or =1 year below their chronological age, one third were reading > or =2 years below their chronological age. CONCLUSIONS: Schools rely on parents to inform them about a TBI, and rarely receive information on possible long-term sequelae. At hospital discharge, health professionals should provide schools with information about TBI and possible long-term impairments, so that children returning to school receive appropriate support.

Return to driving after head injury.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether patients who return to driving after head injury can be considered safe to do so and to compare the patient characteristics of those who return to driving with those who do not. METHODS: In a multicentre qualitative study 10 rehabilitation units collectively registered 563 adults with traumatic brain injury during a 2.5 year period. Recruitment to the study varied from immediately after hospital admission to several years after injury. Patients and their families were interviewed around 3 to 6 months after recruitment. A total of 383 (67.5%) subjects were interviewed within 1 year of injury, of whom 270 (47.6%) were interviewed within 6 months of injury. Main outcome measures were the presence or absence of driving related problems reported by drivers and ex-drivers, and scores on driving related items of the functional independence/functional assessment measure (FIM+FAM). RESULTS: Of the 563 patients 381 were drivers before the injury and 139 had returned to driving at interview. Many current drivers reported problems with behaviour (anger, aggression, irritability; 67 (48.2%)), memory ( 89 (64%)), concentration and attention (39 (28.1%)), and vision (39 (28.1%)). Drivers reported most driving related problems as often as ex-drivers, main exceptions were epilepsy and community mobility. Current drivers scored significantly higher on the FIM+FAM (were more independent), than ex-drivers. The driving group had sustained less severe head injuries than ex-drivers; nevertheless, 78 (56.2%) current drivers had received a severe head injury. Few (61 (16%)) previous drivers reported receiving formal advice about driving after injury. CONCLUSIONS: The existence of problems which could significantly affect driving does not prevent patients returning to driving after traumatic brain injury. Patients should be assessed for both mental and physical status before returning to driving after a head injury, and systems put in place to enable clear and consistent advice to be given to patients about driving.

Use of the functional assessment measure (FIM+FAM) in head injury rehabilitation: a psychometric analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The drive to measure outcome during rehabilitation after brain injury has led to the increased use of the functional assessment measure (FIM+FAM), a 30 item, seven level ordinal scale. The objectives of the study were to determine the psychometric structure, internal consistency, and other characteristics of the measure. METHODS: Psychometric analyses including both traditional principal components analysis and Rasch analysis were carried out on FIM+FAM data from 2268 assessments in 965 patients from 11 brain injury rehabilitation programmes. RESULTS: Two emergent principal components were characterised as representing physical and cognitive functioning respectively. Subscales based on these components were shown to have high internal consistency and reliability. These subscales and the full scale conformed only partially to a Rasch model. Use of raw item ratings, as opposed to transformed ratings, to produce summary scores for the two subscales and the full scale did not introduce serious distortion. CONCLUSION: The full FIM+FAM scale and two derived subscales have high internal reliability and the use of untransformed ratings should be adequate for most clinical and research purposes in comparable samples of patients with head injury.