Intermittent treatment of BRAFV600E melanoma cells delays resistance by adaptive resensitization to drug rechallenge.

Patients with melanoma receiving drugs targeting BRAFV600E and mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase kinases 1 and 2 (MEK1/2) invariably develop resistance and face continued progression. Based on preclinical studies, intermittent treatment involving alternating periods of drug withdrawal and rechallenge has been proposed as a method to delay the onset of resistance. The beneficial effect of intermittent treatment has been attributed to drug addiction, where drug withdrawal reduces the viability of resistant cells due to MAP kinase pathway hyperactivation. However, the mechanistic basis of the intermittent effect is incompletely understood. We show that intermittent treatment with the BRAFV600E inhibitor, LGX818/encorafenib, suppresses growth compared with continuous treatment in human melanoma cells engineered to express BRAFV600E, p61-BRAFV600E, or MEK2C125 oncogenes. Analysis of the BRAFV600E-overexpressing cells shows that, while drug addiction clearly occurs, it fails to account for the advantageous effect of intermittent treatment. Instead, growth suppression is best explained by resensitization during periods of drug removal, followed by cell death after drug readdition. Continuous treatment leads to transcriptional responses prominently associated with chemoresistance in melanoma. By contrast, cells treated intermittently reveal a subset of transcripts that reverse expression between successive cycles of drug removal and rechallenge and include mediators of cell invasiveness and the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. These transcripts change during periods of drug removal by adaptive switching, rather than selection pressure. Resensitization occurs against a background of sustained expression of melanoma resistance genes, producing a transcriptome distinct from that of the initial drug-naive cell state. We conclude that phenotypic plasticity leading to drug resensitization can underlie the beneficial effect of intermittent treatment.

Complex of human Melanotransferrin and SC57.32 Fab fragment reveals novel interdomain arrangement with ferric N-lobe and open C-lobe.

Melanotransferrin (MTf) is an iron-binding member of the transferrin superfamily that can be membrane-anchored or secreted in serum. On cells, it can mediate transferrin-independent iron uptake and promote proliferation. In serum, it is a transcytotic iron transporter across the blood-brain barrier. MTf has been exploited as a drug delivery carrier to the brain and as an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) target due to its oncogenic role in melanoma and its elevated expression in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). For treatment of TNBC, an MTf-targeting ADC completed a phase I clinical trial (NCT03316794). The structure of its murine, unconjugated Fab fragment (SC57.32) is revealed here in complex with MTf. The MTf N-lobe is in an active and iron-bound, closed conformation while the C-lobe is in an open conformation incompatible with iron binding. This combination of active and inactive domains displays a novel inter-domain arrangement in which the C2 subdomain angles away from the N-lobe. The C2 subdomain also contains the SC57.32 glyco-epitope, which comprises ten protein residues and two N-acetylglucosamines. Our report reveals novel features of MTf and provides a point of reference for MTf-targeting, structure-guided drug design.

Structure of human DPEP3 in complex with the SC-003 antibody Fab fragment reveals basis for lack of dipeptidase activity.

Dipeptidase 3 (DPEP3) is one of three glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored metallopeptidases potentially involved in the hydrolytic metabolism of dipeptides. While its exact biological function is not clear, DPEP3 expression is normally limited to testis, but can be elevated in ovarian cancer. Antibody drug conjugates targeting DPEP3 have shown efficacy in preclinical models with a pyrrolobenzodiazepine conjugate, SC-003, dosed in a phase I clinical trial (NCT02539719). Here we reveal the novel atomic structure of DPEP3 alone and in complex with the SC-003 Fab fragment at 1.8 and 2.8 Å, respectively. The structure of DPEP3/SC-003 Fab complex reveals an eighteen-residue epitope across the DPEP3 dimerization interface distinct from the enzymatic active site. DPEP1 and DPEP3 extracellular domains share a conserved, dimeric TIM (ß/α)8-barrel fold, consistent with 49% sequence identity. However, DPEP3 diverges from DPEP1 and DPEP2 in key positions of its active site: a histidine to tyrosine variation at position 269 reduces affinity for the ß zinc and may cause substrate steric hindrance, whereas an aspartate to asparagine change at position 359 abolishes activation of the nucleophilic water/hydroxide, resulting in no in vitro activity against a variety of dipeptides and biological substrates (imipenem, leukotriene D4 and cystinyl-bis-glycine). Hence DPEP3, unlike DPEP1 and DPEP2, may require an activating co-factor in vivo or may remain an inactive, degenerate enzyme. This report sheds light on the structural discriminants between active and inactive membrane dipeptidases and provides a benchmark to characterize current and future DPEP3-targeted therapeutic approaches.