Activity of cabazitaxel after docetaxel and abiraterone acetate therapy in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cabazitaxel and AA have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use after docetaxel in mCRPC. Recently, CAB appeared to be active when given after AA. AA is capable of inducing AR splice variants that confer ligand-independent AR transactivation. Because microtubule-targeting agents impair AR nuclear transport and activity, we raised concerns about CAB efficacy after AA failure in mCRPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty mCRPC patients received AA after docetaxel treatment in compassionate programs. Of them, 24 (18.4%) subsequently received CAB. We retrospectively reviewed their data using conventional methods. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients received a median of 4 (range, 1-13) CAB cycles. Nineteen (79.1%) of them received primary prophylaxis with growth factors. Median patient characteristics were: age 65 (range, 57-85) years; Gleason score: 8 (range, 6-10); and PSA: 128.1 (range, 0.01-1700) ng/mL. A PSA response (≥ 50% decrease from baseline) occurred in 6 (31.5%) of 19 evaluable patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.8-54.2%). CAB therapy obtained a partial response in 2 of the 13 (15.3%) evaluable patients (95% CI, 2.9-45.4%). Median survival from initiation of CAB was 8.2 (95% CI, 3.34-13.05) months, from AA 16.1 (95% CI, 11.56-20.64) and from docetaxel 32.0 (95% CI, 11.56-39.69). CONCLUSION: A limited number of patients with mCRPC received CAB after docetaxel and AA treatment. In this selected population, CAB was active.

Experience with sunitinib treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in a large cohort of Israeli patients: outcome and associated factors.

BACKGROUND: The VEGFR/PDGFR inhibitor sunitinib was approved in Israel in 2008 for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), based on an international trial. However, the efficacy of sunitinib treatment in Israeli mRCC patients has not been previously reported. OBJECTIVES: To report the outcome and associated factors of sunitinib treatment in a large cohort of Israeli mRCC patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of an unselected cohort of mRCC patients who were treated with sunitinib during the period 2006-2013 in six Israeli hospitals. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the association between treatment outcome and clinicopathologic factors. RESULTS: We identified 145 patients; the median age was 65 years, 63% were male, 80% had a nephrectomy, and 28% had prior systemic treatment. Seventy-nine percent (n = 115) had clinical benefit (complete response 5%, n = 7; partial response 33%, n = 48; stable disease 41%, n = 60); 21% (n = 30) were refractory to treatment. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12 months and median overall survival 21 months. Factors associated with clinical benefit were sunitinib-induced hypertension: [odds ratio (OR) 3.6, P = 0.042] and sunitinib dose reduction or treatment interruption (OR 2.4, P = 0.049). Factors associated with PFS were female gender [hazard ratio (HR) 2, P = 0.0041, pre-sunitinib treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio < or = 3 (HR 2.19, P = 0.002), and active smoking (HR 0.19, P < 0.0001). Factors associated with overall survival were active smoking (HR 0.25, P < 0.0001) and sunitinib-induced hypertension (HR 0.48, P = 0.005). To minimize toxicity, the dose was reduced or the treatment interrupted in 39% (n = 57). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of sunitinib treatment for mRCC among Israeli patients is similar to that in international data.

Active smoking may negatively affect response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib.

BACKGROUND: Obesity, smoking, hypertension, and diabetes are risk factors for renal cell carcinoma development. Their presence has been associated with a worse outcome in various cancers. We sought to determine their association with outcome of sunitinib treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). METHODS: An international multicenter retrospective study of sunitinib-treated mRCC patients was performed. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine the association between outcome and the pretreatment status of smoking, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, and other known prognostic factors. RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2013, 278 mRCC patients were treated with sunitinib: 59 were active smokers, 67 were obese, 73 were diabetic, and 165 had pretreatment hypertension. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9 months, and overall survival (OS) was 22 months. Factors associated with PFS were smoking status (past and active smokers: hazard ratio [HR]: 1.17, p = .39; never smokers: HR: 2.94, p < .0001), non-clear cell histology (HR: 1.62, p = .011), pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio >3 (HR: 3.51, p < .0001), use of angiotensin system inhibitors (HR: 0.63, p = .01), sunitinib dose reduction or treatment interruption (HR: 0.72, p = .045), and Heng risk (good and intermediate risk: HR: 1.07, p = .77; poor risk: HR: 1.87, p = .046). Factors associated with OS were smoking status (past and active smokers: HR: 1.25, p = .29; never smokers: HR: 2.7, p < .0001), pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio >3 (HR: 2.95, p < .0001), and sunitinib-induced hypertension (HR: 0.57, p = .002). CONCLUSION: Active smoking may negatively affect the PFS and OS of sunitinib-treated mRCC. Clinicians should consider advising patients to quit smoking at initiation of sunitinib treatment for mRCC.

Bisphosphonates combined with sunitinib may improve the response rate, progression free survival and overall survival of patients with bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates are used to prevent skeletal events of bone metastases, and may exhibit antitumour effects. We aimed to evaluate whether bisphosphonates can bring a response rate (RR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefit to patients with bone metastasis from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) that is treated with sunitinib. METHODS: We performed a multicentre retrospective study of patients with bone metastases from RCC that was treated with sunitinib. The effect of bisphosphonates on RR, PFS and OS was tested with adjustment for known prognostic factors using a chi-square test from contingency table and partial likelihood test from Cox regression model. RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2011, 209 patients with metastatic RCC were treated with sunitinib, 76 had bone metastases, 35 bisphosphonates users and 41 non-users. The groups of bisphosphonates users and non-users were balanced regarding known prognostic factors. Objective response was partial response/stable disease 86% (n = 30) versus 71% (n = 29), and progressive disease 14% (n = 5) versus 29% (n = 12) (p = 0.125, OR 2.48) in users versus non-users, respectively. Median PFS was 15 versus 5 months (HR = 0.55, p<0.0001), and median OS was not reached (with a median follow-up time of 45 months) versus 14 months (HR = 0.4, p = 0.029), in favour of users. In multivariate analysis of the entire patient cohort (n = 76), factors associated with PFS were bisphosphonates use (HR = 0.58, p = 0.035), and pre-treatment neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio >3 (HR = 3.5, p = 0.009). Factors associated with OS were bisphosphonates use (HR = 0.5, p = 0.008), elevated pre-treatment alkaline phosphatase (HR = 2.9, p = 0.003) and sunitinib induced HTN (HR = 0.63, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Bisphosphonates may improve the RR, PFS and OS of sunitinib treatment in RCC with bone metastases.

Heavily pretreated ovarian cancer patients treated by single-agent gemcitabine. A retrospective outcome comparison between platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant patients.

To assess activity and toxicity of gemcitabine treatment in heavily pretreated epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients and compare the outcome between platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant patients. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 43 women with EOC treated with gemcitabine on Days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days. Response was evaluated by physical examination and serial CA 125 measurements. The patients (median age 62 years, range 29-87) were previously exposed to a median of 3 (2-8) chemotherapy regimens. A median of 3.5 (1-14) gemcitabine cycles were administered. Eleven (25.6%) patients showed partial response, 19 (44.2%) had stable disease and 13 (30.2%) progressed. Among 22 platinum-sensitive and 21 platinum-resistant patients, the response rate was 45.5% and 4.7% respectively (p = 0.001), and the median time to progression was 5.0 and 2.8 months, respectively (p = 0.0006). The respective median survival was 16.5 and 6.3 months (p = 0.0001). Grade III-IV hematological toxicities included anemia in four (9.3%) patients, thrombocytopenia in four (9.3%) and leucopenia in two (4.7%). The main non-hematological toxicities were grade III fatigue in two patients (4.7%) and nausea and vomiting in two (4.7%). Single agent gemcitabine is an attractive option for heavily pretreated EOC patients. The significant difference between platinum-sensitive and resistant patients' warrants further investigation.

Combined systemic chronotherapy and hepatic artery infusion for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer confined to the liver.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer is still a clinical challenge. We describe the use of combined hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of irinotecan (CPT-11) in conjunction with systemic chronotherapy infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5FU), folinic acid and carboplatin in patients with colorectal liver metastases. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with colorectal cancer and isolated liver metastases were enrolled in this trial. Intraoperative insertion of an intra-arterial catheter into the hepatic artery was accomplished during the colon operation (in cases of synchronous tumor) or as a separate procedure in colorectal cancer patients with newly diagnosed liver metastases. A systemic double-lumen double-chamber port was inserted via the subclavian vein as a separate procedure. The treatment plan included irinotecan given by intra-arterial infusion at 150 mg/m2 for 1 h. After 2 weeks of rest chronomodulated 5FU (700 mg/m(2); peak delivery rate at 04:00 h), leucovorin (175 mg/m2; peak delivery rate at 04:00 h) and carboplatin (40 mg/m2; peak delivery rate at 16:00 h) for 4 days was followed by 10 days' rest and then given again. After 10 days' rest another HAI was introduced using the same method. Each cycle of therapy included 2 HAI courses and 2 chronotherapy courses in between. After 2 complete cycles, patients were evaluated for their response with weekly accessed toxicity recording. RESULTS: Seven women, 8 men, median age 61 years (range 46-72). Eight patients had synchronous colon and hepatic disease and 7 patients had metachronous disease. Ten patients had previously been treated with 5FU and leucovorin while 5 patients were chemonaive. The mean number of cycles were 11.6 per patient (range 8-19). Partial response was achieved in 6 patients (40%) and was followed by laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation in 5 patients (33%). Disease stabilization was observed in 2 patients (13%) and disease progression in 7 patients (47%) mainly after previous chemotherapy failure. Side effects were infrequent and mild including grade 2 GIT complaints (5 patients), RUQ pain during HAI (9 patients) and grade 2 hematological complaints in 2 patients. CONCLUSION: A combined chemotherapy protocol (HAI and chronotherapy) with irinotecan (CPT-11) together with chronomodulated infusion of 5FU, folinic acid and carboplatin can be used in metastatic colorectal patients with a high efficacy rate and minor side effects especially in pretreated patients.