Diaphyseal forearm fractures treated with and without bone graft.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the acute bone grafting of diaphyseal forearm fractures decreases the incidence of nonunion and reduces the time to union. Although the traditional treatment of comminuted radius and/or ulnar shaft fractures involves bone graft, a recent report called into question this practice. PATIENTS: A database search was used to identify all acute diaphyseal forearm fractures presenting to an urban Level I trauma center between 1988 and 1996. All radius and/or ulnar shaft fractures, as well as all Monteggia and Galeazzi fracture-dislocations, in patients with closed physes were included. The charts and operative reports were available for 64 diaphyseal forearm fractures in 49 patients. Fifty-six fractures were followed for at least 1 year beyond clinical and radiographic union. The injuries were treated with open reduction and plate fixation by experienced orthopedic traumatologists. All noncomminuted fractures were treated without bone graft. For the comminuted fractures, the decision to use bone graft was left to the discretion of the operating surgeon. RESULTS: Overall, 55 of 56 fractures (98%) achieved union at a mean of 49 days (range, 19-123 days), with the only nonunion occurring in a patient with a closed, noncomminuted Galeazzi injury. Among the 20 noncomminuted fractures, all of which were treated without bone graft, 19 (95%) achieved union at a mean of 50 days (range, 19-102 days). Among the 36 comminuted fractures, all 25 treated without bone graft achieved fusion at an average of 50 days (range, 20-123 days) and all 11 treated with bone graft achieved union at an average of 45 days (range, 22-67 days). No statistically significant difference in the incidence of nonunion or time to union was noted between fractures that were treated with and without bone graft. CONCLUSION: Acute bone grafting of diaphyseal forearm fractures did not affect the union rate or the time to union.

Pathophysiology of delayed healing.

Delayed union represents an ongoing failure of initial fracture management. It still occurs partly because the precise reason why a patient's fracture does not heal frequently is unknown. This article aims to outline the limited material available on the pathophysiology of delayed healing. The systemic status of the patient, local limb status before injury, the nature of the traumatic injury, local host response to the injury, potential negative impact of orthopaedic fracture care, and pharmacologic variables are considered.

The effect of tourniquet use in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A prospective, randomized study.

To evaluate the effect of tourniquet use during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, 40 consecutive patients were randomized into two groups: Group I (tourniquet) and Group II (no tourniquet). Preoperative evaluation included electromyography, measurement of thigh and calf girth, and determination of serum creatinine phosphokinase levels. Initial postoperative evaluations included serial creatinine phosphokinase determinations. At 1 and 6 months postoperatively, the electromyographic examination was repeated and thigh and calf girth measurements were obtained. At 6 months and 1 year after surgery, the following evaluations were made: thigh and calf girth, KT-1000 arthrometric testing, isokinetic testing of quadriceps and hamstring muscles, single-legged hop test for time, single-legged hop test for distance, and the Lysholm knee score. In Group I, the tourniquet was inflated for an average of 87 minutes, with an average pressure of 269 mm Hg. At 1 month postoperatively, 6 of 20 patients in Group I had positive electromyographic recordings (compared with 2 of 20 in Group II, P = 0.08). At 1 month, thigh girths measured 10 cm proximal to the medial joint line suggested more atrophy in the tourniquet group (P = 0.07). At 6 months, all electromyographic recordings had returned to normal. At 6 months and 1 year postoperatively, girth measurements, isokinetic strength testing, functional testing, KT-1000 arthrometer evaluation, and the Lysholm knee scores were similar for both groups.

Effect of metatarsal pads and their positioning: a quantitative assessment.

Many conditions of the foot have been related to pressure maldistribution. Alteration of plantar pressure through improvements of shoe fit, orthoses, and surgery are presumed to correct pressure maldistribution. We evaluated 10 volunteers with normal, asymptomatic feet. With the use of an ultrathin in-shoe sensor, plantar pressures were measured within the shoe at the shoe/foot interface. Test conditions included three pad types: large foam, large felt, and small felt. They were evaluated in three positions: normal (at the metatarsal head base) and 5 mm proximal and 5 mm distal to the normal position. When compared with the control condition without the pad, each pad type and position caused a variable effect upon plantar pressure. On average, the small felt pad caused the greatest and most consistent decrease in pressure at the metatarsal heads (19.15%). Distal positioning tended to cause the greatest decreases in pressure for all pad types. A pad type and position was found to decrease metatarsal pad pressure in each subject. Metatarsal pads can effectively decrease plantar pressures within the shoe.