ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Understanding the decision factors that drive harmful alcohol use among young adults is of practical and theoretical importance. We apply fuzzy-trace theory (FTT) to investigate a potential danger that may arise from the arguably correct notion that a single drink carries no meaningful risk. Decisions that are mentally represented as one drink at a time could contribute to excessive drinking. METHODS: College students (N = 351) made a series of decisions to take or decline eight hypothetical drinks presented one at a time. Outcome measures included each decision, recent alcohol consumption (weekly drinks, peak blood alcohol content, and binges), and alcohol-related harms (scores on the Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire and Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test). Linear regression models predicted each outcome from sex, perceived risk of a single drink, perceived risk of heavy drinking, perceived consequences of drinking, and general health-related risk sensitivity. RESULTS: Consistent with FTT, decisions to have a first drink and up to four additional drinks in short succession were each associated with lower perceived risk of one drink-a "just-one drink" effect-independent of perceived risks of heavy drinking, perceived consequences of drinking, and general risk sensitivity. Similarly, all measures of recent alcohol consumption and consequent harms were associated with perceived risk of one drink. Participants reporting "zero risk" of a single drink had worse outcomes on all measures than those reporting at least "low risk." CONCLUSIONS: Results are consistent with the theoretically informed premise that consumption decisions are typically made one drink at a time rather than by deciding the total number of drinks to be consumed in a sitting. When decisions about alcohol use proceed one drink at a time, a perception of zero risk in a single drink may contribute to heavy drinking.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Receiving specialty substance treatment or general mental health treatment during remission from substance use disorders (SUD) may reduce odds of SUD recurrence, but little is known about prevalence of treatment or perceptions of treatment need among remitted people in the United States. SAMPLE: Participants in the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, years 2018-2020, were considered remitted if they ever had an SUD (i.e., self-reported history of "problems with alcohol or drugs", or lifetime history of treatment for SUD) but did not meet DSM-IV criteria for substance abuse or dependence during the prior year (n = 9,295). ANALYSES: Annual prevalence was estimated for any SUD treatment (e.g., mutual-help groups), any mental health (MH) treatment (e.g., private therapy), self-reported perceived need for SUD treatment, and self-reported unmet need for MH treatment. Generalized linear models examined effects of socio-demographics, mental illness, past-year substance use, and self-identified recovery status on outcomes. FINDINGS: MH treatment was more common than SUD treatment (27.2% [25.6%, 28.8%] v. 7.8% [7.0%, 8.6%], respectively). Unmet need for mental health treatment was reported by 9.8% [8.8%, 10.9%], but only 0.9% [0.6%, 1.2%] perceived need for substance treatment. Age, sex, marital status, education, health insurance, mental illness, and prior year alcohol use were among the factors associated with variation in outcomes. CONCLUSION: Most people who maintained clinical remission from substance use disorders in the U.S. during the prior year did so without treatment. Remitted people report substantial unmet need for mental health treatment, but not specialized substance use treatment.
