Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 13(8): e0202315, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30092061

ABSTRACT

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198033.].

2.
PLoS One ; 13(7): e0198033, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29995889

ABSTRACT

Altmetric indicators are increasingly present in the research landscape. Among this ecosystem of heterogeneous indicators, social reference managers have been proposed as indicators of broader use of scholarly work. However, little work has been done to understand the data underlying this indicator. The present work uses a large-scale survey to study the users of two prominent social reference managers-Mendeley and Zotero. The survey examines demographic characteristics, usage of the platforms, as well as attitudes towards key issues in scholarly communication, such as open access, peer review, privacy, and the reward system of science. Results show strong differences between platforms: Mendeley users are younger and more gender-balanced; Zotero users are more engaged in social media and more likely to come from the social sciences and humanities. Zotero users are more likely to use the platform's search functions and to organize their libraries, while Mendeley users are more likely to take advantage of some of the discovery and networking features-such as browsing papers and groups and connecting with other users. We discuss the implications of using metrics derived from these platforms as impact indicators.


Subject(s)
Demography/statistics & numerical data , Interdisciplinary Communication , Peer Review, Research/methods , Social Media/statistics & numerical data , Social Networking , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bibliometrics , Humans , Information Dissemination/ethics , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
J Med Entomol ; 49(6): 1485-94, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23270180

ABSTRACT

Results of an environmental assessment conducted in a newly emergent focus of murine typhus in southern California are described. Opossums, Didelphis virginiana Kerr, infested with cat fleas, Ctenocephalides felis Buché, in the suburban area were abundant. Animal and flea specimens were tested for the DNA of two flea-borne rickettsiae, Rickettsia typhi and Rickettsia felis. R. felis was commonly detected in fleas collected throughout this area while R. typhi was found at a much lower prevalence in the vicinity of just 7 of 14 case-patient homes identified. DNA of R. felis, but not R. typhi, was detected in renal, hepatic, and pulmonary tissues of opossums. In contrast, there were no hematologic polymerase chain reaction findings of R. felis or R. typhi in opossums, rats, and cats within the endemic area studied. Our data suggest a significant probability of human exposure to R. felis in the area studied; however, disease caused by this agent is not recognized by the medical community and may be misdiagnosed as murine typhus using nondiscriminatory serologic methods.


Subject(s)
Rickettsia felis/isolation & purification , Rickettsia typhi/isolation & purification , Siphonaptera/microbiology , Typhus, Endemic Flea-Borne/microbiology , Animals , California/epidemiology , Cats , Endemic Diseases , Female , Humans , Male , Mice , Opossums , Rats , Typhus, Endemic Flea-Borne/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...