Advantage of a residualizing iodine radiolabel in the therapy of a colon cancer xenograft targeted with an anticarcinoembryonic antigen monoclonal antibody.

PURPOSE: A disadvantage of conventionally radioiodinated monoclonal antibodies (mAb) for cancer therapy is the short retention time of the radionuclide within target cells. To address this issue, we recently developed a method in which radioiodine is introduced onto antibodies using an adduct consisting of a nonmetabolizable peptide attached to the aminopolycarboxylate diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, designated IMP-R4. This adduct causes the radioiodine to become trapped in lysosomes following antibody catabolism. Clinical-scale production of 131I-IMP-R4-labeled antibodies is possible using a recently developed facile method. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The properties of 131I-IMP-R4-labeled anticarcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) humanized mAb hMN-14 were compared with the directly radioiodinated hMN-14 (131I-hMN-14) in CEA-expressing human colon cancer cell lines, LoVo and LS174T, and in nude mice bearing established LoVo tumor xenografts. RESULTS: 125I-IMP-R4-hMN-14 retention in the cell lines was significantly increased (61.5% after 3 days) compared with 125I-hMN-14. In vivo, a significant improvement in tumor accretion of radiolabel was obtained using 131I-IMP-R4-hMN-14, which led to a marked improvement in therapeutic efficacy. Eight weeks post-treatment, mean tumor volumes were 0.16 +/- 0.19 and 1.99 +/- 1.35 cm3 in mice treated with 131I-IMP-R4-hMN-14 and 131I-hMN-14, respectively, with complete remissions observed in 27% of mice treated with 131I-IMP-R4-hMN-14 and none using 131I-hMN-14. CONCLUSION: 131I-IMP-R4-hMN-14 provides a significant therapeutic advantage in comparison to the conventionally 131I-labeled antibody. The ability of this labeling method to lend itself to clinical-scale labeling, the broad applicability of a humanized anti-CEA mAb for CEA-expressing cancers, and the clinical benefits of radioimmunotherapy with anti-CEA mAb shown recently for small-volume and minimal residual disease combine to make 131I-IMP-R4-hMN-14 a promising new agent for radioimmunotherapy.

Carcinoembryonic antigen antibody inhibits lung metastasis and augments chemotherapy in a human colonic carcinoma xenograft.

PURPOSE: In addition to its use as a blood marker for many carcinomas, elevated expression of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA, CD66e, CEACAM5) has been implicated in various biological aspects of neoplasia, especially tumor cell adhesion, metastasis, the blocking of cellular immune mechanisms, and having antiapoptosis functions. However, it is not known if treatment with anti-CEA antibodies can affect tumor metastasis or alter the effects of cytotoxic drugs. METHODS: In vitro, human colon cancer cell lines were treated with anti-CEA MAb IgG1, hMN-14 (labetuzumab), to assess direct effects on proliferation, as well as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). In vivo studies were undertaken in nude mice bearing s.c. (local growth) or i.v. (metastatic model) GW-39 and LS174T human colon cancer grafts, to evaluate the MAb alone and in combination with either CPT-11 or 5-fluorouracil (5FU). RESULTS: In vitro, labetuzumab did not induce apoptosis, nor did it affect tumor cell proliferation directly or by CDC, but it did inhibit tumor cell proliferation by ADCC. In vivo, labetuzumab did not increase median survival in the GW-39 metastatic model unless the mice were pretreated with GM-CSF to increase their peripheral WBC counts; GM-CSF alone was ineffective. Also, if GW-39 tumors were pretreated with IFN-gamma to up-regulate CEA expression threefold prior to i.v. injection, labetuzumab significantly increased median survival of the mice. When nude mice received labetuzumab with CPT-11 or 5FU, median survival increased significantly as compared to the drug or antibody alone. CONCLUSIONS: Labetuzumab, a CEA-specific MAb, induces effector-cell function in vitro against CEA-positive colonic tumor cells, and also inhibits growth of lung metastasis when CEA expression is up-regulated or if peripheral WBCs are increased. The MAb also shows chemosensitizing properties.

Characterization of a new humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, IMMU-106, and Its use in combination with the humanized anti-CD22 antibody, epratuzumab, for the therapy of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

PURPOSE: A new humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (MAb), IMMU-106, was evaluated to elucidate its action as an antilymphoma therapeutic, as a single agent, and in combination with the anti-CD22 MAb, epratuzumab. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Antiproliferative effects, apoptotic effects, and the ability of IMMU-106 to mediate complement-mediated cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity on a panel of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) cell lines were compared with the chimeric anti-CD20 MAb, rituximab, and evaluated in light of the various levels of antigen expression by the cell lines. In vivo therapy studies were performed in SCID mice bearing disseminated Raji lymphoma. RESULTS: The mechanisms of cytotoxicity of IMMU-106 were found to be similar to rituximab, and include direct apoptosis, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, and complement-mediated cytotoxicity. IMMU-106 was also found to be very similar to rituximab in terms of antigen-binding specificity, binding avidity, and dissociation constant. Treatment of Raji-bearing SCID mice with IMMU-106 yielded median survival increases of up to 4.2-fold compared with control mice. Survival in mice treated with IMMU-106 plus epratuzumab was compared with IMMU-106 treatment alone. Although the combined treatment did not improve median survival, an increased proportion of long-term survivors was observed. An enhanced antiproliferative effect was also observed in vitro in SU-DHL-6 cells when IMMU-106 was combined with epratuzumab. These findings are consistent with the up-regulation of CD22 expression observed after pretreatment of NHL cells in vitro with CD20 MAb (IMMU-106). CONCLUSIONS: It is expected that in humans IMMU-106 should be at least as effective as rituximab and, due to its human framework construction, it may exhibit different pharmacokinetic, toxicity, and therapy profiles. In addition, it may be possible to enhance efficacy by combination therapy comprised of anti-CD20 and other B-cell lineage targeting MAbs, such as epratuzumab. The current results emphasize that in vitro as well as in vivo studies with many of the NHL cell lines were generally predictive of the known activity of anti-CD20 MAbs in NHL patients, as well as the enhanced efficacy of epratuzumab combined with rituximab observed in early clinical trials.