Building Solidarity with Black Nurses to Dismantle Systemic and Structural Racism in Nursing.

Systemic and structural racism in nursing have profound impacts on Black People, Indigenous Peoples, and People of Color. They contributed to underrepresentation in faculty, senior nurse executives, and presidents' positions in academic and healthcare organizations, physical and mental health issues in racialized groups. This quality improvement study described ways in which the Black Nurses Task Force of the Registered Nurses Association of Ontario can build solidarity with nursing and government organizations to dismantle systemic and structural racism in nursing. This study used a structured online survey, comprised of quantitative and qualitative questions. The qualitative data were analyzed using interpretative thematic analysis and the quantitative data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Findings showed that 88% of participants experienced racism and 63% said racism affected their mental health. Three themes emerged from the qualitative data: Social support for Black nurses, accountability of leaders and solidarity with Black nurses. These findings demonstrated the urgent need to dismantle systemic and structural racism in nursing.

Fungal mycelial mats used as textile by indigenous people of North America.

The indigenous people of the United States and Canada long have used forest fungi for food, tinder, medicine, paint, and many other cultural uses. New information about historical uses of fungi continues to be discovered from museums as accessions of fungi and objects made from fungi collected over the last 150+ years are examined and identified. Two textiles thought to be made from fungal mats are located in the Hood Museum of Art, Dartmouth College, and the Oakland Museum of California. Scanning electron microscopy and DNA sequencing were used to attempt to identify the fungus that produced the mats. Although DNA sequencing failed to yield a taxonomic identification, microscopy and characteristics of the mycelial mats suggest that the mats were produced by Laricifomes officinalis. This first report of fungal mats used for textile by indigenous people of North America will help to alert museum curators and conservators as well as mycological researchers to their existence and hopefully lead to more items being discovered that have been made from fungal fabric.

Problems associated with hemodialysis and travel.

BACKGROUND: While there is a recognized risk of hepatitis C acquisition associated with dialysis away from the "home" center, there is little documented data on the effect that dialysis while traveling has on the dialysis patient's health. This study was designed to examine the incidence of travel within a hemodialysis population and to ascertain whether travel was associated with morbidity for patients on hemodialysis. METHODS: Travel data were collected prospectively over a 6-month period, from April 2009, for all patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis across our dialysis centers. Biochemical, microbiological, and hematological parameters as well as hepatitis serology and antibiotic starts were recorded for 12 weeks prior to and following dialysis away from center. RESULTS: A total of 172 individuals traveled on 200 occasions. The blood stream infection rate for travelers with a central venous catheter was 0.25 versus 0.83/1,000 access days (p = 0.038) in the 12 weeks pre-travel versus post-travel. Parenteral and oral antibiotic starts were both significantly elevated post-travel and were mainly instituted for either chest or urinary sepsis. There was evidence of raised inflammatory markers and anemia on return to center but no evidence of hepatitis B or hepatitis C seroconversion. CONCLUSIONS: Travel and dialysis away from a patient's usual hemodialysis unit is a common occurrence but is associated with an increased risk of bacterial infection, anemia, and inflammatory response. This study provides evidence for the concern that hemodialysis away from center is associated with increased morbidity.

Inpatient initiation of beta-blockade plus nurse management in vulnerable heart failure patients: a randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Predischarge beta-blocker initiation in hospitalized patients with heart failure due to reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is safe and improves adherence; improved outcomes with this approach have not been demonstrated in a randomized trial. This study compared 6-month rehospitalization rates among patients assigned to predischarge beta-blockade coupled with postdischarge nurse management (intervention) versus usual care. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomized 64 patients with an LVEF

Comprehensive coronary artery disease care in a safety-net hospital: results of Get With The Guidelines quality improvement initiative.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to published coronary artery disease (CAD) guidelines is suboptimal, particularly among minorities and the poor. While hospital-based quality-improvement programs may increase the use of evidence-based therapies, little data exist regarding the impact of such programs in sociodemographically disadvantaged (vulnerable) populations. Vulnerable patients in the United States are cared for primarily within the safety-net health system, which comprises urban public hospitals and outpatient community health centers. Denver Health is an example of an integrated system that encompasses both types of facilities. OBJECTIVE: To assess evidence-based medication use in CAD patients after initiation of an inpatient quality-improvement program at Denver Health. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 499 patients with angiographically proven CAD who were hospitalized between July 1998 and December 2002. Patients were prospectively identified through a multidisciplinary intervention led by a nurse manager, and their records were input retrospectively into the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines patient management tool. The association's program, which recommends initiating 4 cardioprotective drug classes while patients are hospitalized, was started 2 years into the observation period (August 2000). Treatment rates were compared over the ensuing years. We evaluated temporal trends in discharge use of 4 drugs: (1) betablockers, (2) angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), (3) hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins), and (4) aspirin. We calculated the proportion of eligible patients (no documented contraindication) who were prescribed each drug category as well as the proportion who received all 4 drug categories, our principal composite outcome. If any one drug was absent, the composite criterion was considered unmet. RESULTS: We observed progressive improvement in discharge use of the 4- drug composite: 18% in 1998-1999 (95% confidence interval [CI], 12%-25%), 50% in 2000 (95% CI, 37%-63%), 62% (95% CI, 54%-70%) in 2001, and 72% (65%-79%) in 2002 (P <0.001 for between-year differences). Among eligible patients discharged in 2002, 90% received beta-blockers, 91% received ACEIs, 86% received statins, and 93% received aspirin. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a multidisciplinary program led by a nurse manager was associated with increased CAD guideline compliance among sociodemographically disadvantaged patients. This compliance exceeded national averages. Achievement of the composite measure of use of all 4 recommended drug categories at discharge improved from 18% in 1998-1999 to 72% in 2002.

Impact of a cardiac risk reduction program in vulnerable patients hospitalized with coronary artery disease.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To increase the use of guideline-based pharmacotherapy in vulnerable patients (ethnic minorities and the poor) with coronary artery disease (CAD) through a nurse-based quality-improvement program. DESIGN: Retrospective program evaluation. SETTING: Inner-city hospital in Denver, Colorado. PATIENTS: One hundred fifty-one consecutive patients hospitalized with a CAD-related diagnosis. INTERVENTION: A nurse-management program was initiated for patients with angiographically documented CAD, and rates of guideline-based care were compared with rates for historic controls. The intervention consisted of two key elements: patient counseling with language-appropriate education materials and direct physician education regarding the importance of cardioprotective drugs. The 151 patients in the intervention group were compared with 125 historic control patients hospitalized before the program was begun. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess differences in care with regard to ethnicity, education level, and insurance status, and to adjust for different baseline characteristics. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: At hospital discharge, patients in the intervention group were more likely to receive statins (71% vs 52%, p=0.001) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (79% vs 51%, p<0.001) compared with controls. These differences remained after adjusting for ethnicity, education level, insurance status, and baseline clinical characteristics. Also, a trend was noted toward greater use of aspirin (92% vs 86%, p=0.13) and beta-blockers (79% vs 73%, p=0.24) in the intervention group compared with controls. Patients in the intervention group were more likely to receive counseling for smoking cessation. CONCLUSION: An inpatient nurse-management program improved the quality of care for patients with CAD regardless of sociodemographic status. Properly designed disease-management initiatives can be effective for disadvantaged patients, who often obtain health care through emergency and inpatient services.

The effect of intraabdominal irrigation at cesarean delivery on maternal morbidity: a randomized trial.

To determine if intraabdominal irrigation with normal saline at cesarean delivery is associated with increased maternal morbidity. One hundred ninety-six women undergoing routine cesarean delivery at at least 37 weeks' gestation were prospectively randomized to receive 500-1000 mL of normal saline intraabdominal irrigation versus no irrigation after closure of the uterine incision, but before abdominal wall closure. Data were collected for comparison of demographic factors, intrapartum and postpartum complication rates, and maternal and neonatal outcomes. The primary outcome measure was the combined incidence of maternal morbidity, defined as at least one of the following: postoperative infectious morbidity, postpartum hemorrhage, severe anemia, and urinary retention.Ninety-seven patients were randomized to the irrigation group and 99 to the control group. The demographic characteristics of the two groups were similar. Thirteen patients (13.1%) in the control group and 14 patients (14.4%) in the irrigation group experienced maternal morbidity (P =.84). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in estimated blood loss, operating time, incidence of intrapartum complications, hospital stay, return of gastrointestinal function, incidence of infectious complications, or neonatal outcomes.Routine intraabdominal irrigation at cesarean delivery in a low-risk population does not reduce intrapartum or postpartum maternal morbidity.