Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 26(8-9): 891-894, 2019 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31329880

ABSTRACT

The Indian Health Service provides care to remote and under-resourced communities in the United States. American Indian/Alaska Native patients have some of the highest morbidity and mortality among any ethnic group in the United States. Starting in the 1980s, the IHS implemented the Resource and Patient Management System health information technology (HIT) platform to improve efficiency and quality to address these disparities. The IHS is currently assessing the Resource and Patient Management System to ensure that changing health information needs are met. HIT assessments have traditionally focused on cost, reimbursement opportunities, infrastructure, required or desired functionality, and the ability to meet provider needs. Little information exists on frameworks that assess HIT legacy systems to determine solutions for an integrated rural healthcare system whose end goal is health equity. This search for a next-generation HIT solution for a historically underserved population presents a unique opportunity to envision and redefine HIT that supports health equity as its core mission.


Subject(s)
American Indian or Alaska Native , Health Equity , Medical Informatics/organization & administration , United States Indian Health Service/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility , Healthcare Disparities , History, 21st Century , Humans , Medical Informatics/history , United States , United States Indian Health Service/history
2.
Health Serv Res ; 52(4): 1349-1363, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27461978

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To understand the use of electronic health record (EHR) functionalities by physicians practicing in an underserved setting. DATA SOURCE/STUDY SETTING: A total of 333 Indian Health Service physicians (55 percent response rate) in August 2012. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional. DATA COLLECTION: The survey assessed routine use of EHR functionalities, perceived usefulness, and barriers to adoption. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Physicians routinely used a median 7 of 10 EHR functionalities targeted by the Meaningful Use program, but only 5 percent used all 10. Most (63 percent) felt the EHR improved quality of care. Many (76 percent) reported increased documentation time and poorer quality patient-physician interactions (45 percent). Primary care specialty and time using the EHR were positively associated with use of EHR functionalities, while perceived productivity loss was negatively associated. CONCLUSIONS: Significant opportunities exist to increase use of EHR functionalities and preserve physician-patient interactions and productivity in a resource-limited environment.


Subject(s)
Electronic Health Records , Meaningful Use , United States Indian Health Service , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diffusion of Innovation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , United States
4.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 14(2): 191-7, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17213495

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: There are limited data regarding implementing electronic health records (EHR) in underserved settings. We evaluated the implementation of an EHR within the Indian Health Service (IHS), a federally funded health system for Native Americans. DESIGN: We surveyed 223 primary care clinicians practicing at 26 IHS health centers that implemented an EHR between 2003 and 2005. METHODS: The survey instrument assessed clinician attitudes regarding EHR implementation, current utilization of individual EHR functions, and attitudes regarding the use of information technology to improve quality of care in underserved settings. We fit a multivariable logistic regression model to identify correlates of increased utilization of the EHR. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 56%. Of responding clinicians, 66% felt that the EHR implementation process was positive. One-third (35%) believed that the EHR improved overall quality of care, with many (39%) feeling that it decreased the quality of the patient-doctor interaction. One-third of clinicians (34%) reported consistent use of electronic reminders, and self-report that EHRs improve quality was strongly associated with increased utilization of the EHR (odds ratio 3.03, 95% confidence interval 1.05-8.8). The majority (87%) of clinicians felt that information technology could potentially improve quality of care in rural and underserved settings through the use of tools such as online information sources, telemedicine programs, and electronic health records. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians support the use of information technology to improve quality in underserved settings, but many felt that it was not currently fulfilling its potential in the IHS, potentially due to limited use of key functions within the EHR.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Attitude to Computers , Health Plan Implementation , Medical Records Systems, Computerized , United States Indian Health Service/organization & administration , Data Collection , Humans , Medical Records Systems, Computerized/statistics & numerical data , Medically Underserved Area , Organizational Innovation , Physicians, Family , Quality of Health Care , Rural Health Services/organization & administration , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...