Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Health Econ ; 33(5): 911-928, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38251043

ABSTRACT

This study examines the impact of social insurance benefit restrictions on physician behaviour, using ophthalmologists as a case study. We examine whether ophthalmologists use their market power to alter their fees and rebates across services to compensate for potential policy-induced income losses. The results show that ophthalmologists substantially reduced their fees and rebates for services directly targeted by the benefit restriction compared to other medical specialists' fees and rebates. There is also some evidence that they increased their fees for services that were not targeted. High-fee charging ophthalmologists exhibited larger fee and rebate responses while the low-fee charging group raise their rebates to match the reference price provided by the policy environment.


Subject(s)
Ophthalmology , Physicians , Humans , United States , Insurance Benefits , Fees, Medical , Fees and Charges
2.
Qual Life Res ; 31(10): 3041-3048, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35486216

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: 'Bolt-on' dimensions are additional items added to multi-attribute utility instruments (MAUIs) such as EQ-5D that measure constructs not included in the core descriptive system. The use of bolt-ons has been proposed to improve the content validity and responsiveness of the descriptive system in certain settings and health conditions. EQ-5D bolt-ons serve a particular purpose and thus satisfy a certain set of criteria. The aim of this paper is to propose a set of criteria to guide the development, assessment and selection of candidate bolt-on descriptors. METHODS: Criteria were developed using an iterative approach. First, existing criteria were identified from the literature including those used to guide the development of MAUIs, the COSMIN checklist and reviews of existing bolt-ons. Second, processes used to develop bolt-ons based on qualitative and quantitative approaches were considered. The information from these two stages was formalised into draft development and selection criteria. These were reviewed by the project team and iteratively refined. RESULTS: Overall, 23 criteria for the development, assessment and selection of candidate bolt-ons were formulated. Development criteria focused on issues relating to i) structure, ii) language, and iii) consistency with the existing EQ-5D dimension structure. Assessment and selection criteria focused on face and content validity and classical psychometric indicators. CONCLUSION: The criteria generated can be used to guide the development of bolt-ons across different health areas. They can also be used to assess existing bolt-ons, and inform their inclusion in studies and patient groups where the EQ-5D may lack content validity.


Subject(s)
Health Status , Quality of Life , Humans , Psychometrics , Quality of Life/psychology , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy ; 17(2): 243-254, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30617458

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2009, mandatory folic acid fortification of bread-making flour was introduced in Australia to reduce the birth prevalence of preventable neural tube defects (NTDs) such as spina bifida. Before the introduction of the policy, modelling predicted a reduction of 14-49 NTDs each year. OBJECTIVE: Using real-world data, this study provides the first ex-post evaluation of the cost effectiveness of mandatory folic acid fortification of bread-making flour in Australia. METHODS: We developed a decision tree model to compare different fortification strategies and used registry data to quantify the change in NTD rates due to the policy. We adopted a societal perspective that included costs to industry and government as well as healthcare and broader societal costs. RESULTS: We found 32 fewer NTDs per year in the post-mandatory folic acid fortification period. Mandatory folic acid fortification improved health outcomes and was highly cost effective because of the low intervention cost. The policy demonstrated improved equity in outcomes, particularly in birth prevalence of NTDs in births from teenage and indigenous mothers. CONCLUSIONS: This study calculated the value of mandatory folic acid fortification using real-world registry data and demonstrated that the attained benefit was comparable to the modelled expected benefits. Mandatory folic acid fortification (in addition to policies including advice on supplementation and education) improved equity in certain populations and was effective and highly cost effective for the Australian population.


Subject(s)
Flour/economics , Folic Acid/therapeutic use , Food, Fortified/economics , Mandatory Programs/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Australia/epidemiology , Bread/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Costs and Cost Analysis , Decision Trees , Female , Folic Acid/administration & dosage , Folic Acid/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Neural Tube Defects/economics , Neural Tube Defects/epidemiology , Neural Tube Defects/prevention & control , Prevalence , Young Adult
4.
ANZ J Surg ; 88(6): E507-E511, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28982209

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) compared with multiphase CE computed tomography (CE-CT) scan to characterize suspected liver lesions in patients with known colorectal carcinoma. METHODS: A decision analytic model linking diagnostic accuracy to health outcomes in patients with colorectal carcinoma was constructed. The model assumed that CE-MRI has superior sensitivity and equivalent specificity to CE-CT, and patients with a colorectal liver metastasis could be eligible for curative surgery or chemotherapy and palliation. Delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis was associated with worse health outcomes (disutility). Cost-effectiveness was calculated as the incremental cost relative to the incremental benefit, the benefit was estimated using quality-adjusted life years. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the results. RESULTS: The clinical evidence supports increased sensitivity of CE-MRI compared with CE-CT (0.943 versus 0.768). CE-MRI was more effective and more costly than CE-CT. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated to be $40 548 per quality-adjusted life year gained. The model is most sensitive to the cost of MRI, cost of palliative treatment and the disutility associated with delayed palliative care. The results were also sensitive to the assumptions made about the clinical algorithm. CONCLUSION: The results provide evidence of the potential cost-effectiveness associated with CE-MRI for the diagnosis of liver metastases in patients with identified colorectal carcinoma. CE-MRI can be recommended as cost-effective provided it replaces CE-CT and that improved diagnostic accuracy results in earlier, curative, disease management.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/economics , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/economics , Aged , Australia , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Contrast Media , Decision Support Techniques , Female , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Economic , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Risk Assessment , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...