Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cancer Res ; 78(10): 2577-2588, 2018 05 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29463581

ABSTRACT

Small-molecule inhibitors of the Hedgehog (HH) pathway receptor Smoothened (SMO) have been effective in treating some patients with basal cell carcinoma (BCC), where the HH pathway is often activated, but many patients respond poorly. In this study, we report the results of investigations on PTCH1 signaling in the HH pathway that suggest why most patients with BCC respond poorly to SMO inhibitors. In immortalized human keratinocytes, PTCH1 silencing led to the generation of a compact, holoclone-like morphology with increased expression of SMO and the downstream HH pathway transcription factor GLI1. Notably, although siRNA silencing of SMO in PTCH1-silenced cells was sufficient to suppress GLI1 activity, this effect was not phenocopied by pharmacologic inhibition of SMO, suggesting the presence of a second undefined pathway through which SMO can induce GLI1. Consistent with this possibility, we observed increased nuclear localization of SMO in PTCH1-silenced cells as mediated by a putative SMO nuclear/nucleolar localization signal [N(o)LS]. Mutational inactivation of the N(o)LS ablated this increase and suppressed GLI1 induction. Immunohistologic analysis of human and mouse BCC confirmed evidence of nuclear SMO, although the pattern was heterogeneous between tumors. In PTCH1-silenced cells, >80% of the genes found to be differentially expressed were unaffected by SMO inhibitors, including the putative BCC driver gene CXCL11. Our results demonstrate how PTCH1 loss results in aberrant regulation of SMO-independent mechanisms important for BCC biology and highlights a novel nuclear mechanism of SMO-GLI1 signaling that is unresponsive to SMO inhibitors.Significance: This study describes novel noncanonical Hedgehog signaling, where SMO enters the nucleus to activate GLI1, a mode that is unaffected by SMO inhibitors, thus prompting re-evaluation of current BCC treatment as well as new potential therapies targeting nuclear SMO. Cancer Res; 78(10); 2577-88. ©2018 AACR.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Basal Cell/pathology , Patched-1 Receptor/metabolism , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Smoothened Receptor/metabolism , Zinc Finger Protein GLI1/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Chemokine CXCL11/genetics , Humans , Keratinocytes/pathology , Patched-1 Receptor/genetics , RNA Interference , RNA, Small Interfering/genetics , Smoothened Receptor/antagonists & inhibitors , Smoothened Receptor/genetics
2.
PLoS One ; 6(5): e20271, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21633508

ABSTRACT

The GLI (GLI1/GLI2) transcription factors have been implicated in the development and progression of prostate cancer although our understanding of how they actually contribute to the biology of these common tumours is limited. We observed that GLI reporter activity was higher in normal (PNT-2) and tumourigenic (DU145 and PC-3) androgen-independent cells compared to androgen-dependent LNCaP prostate cancer cells and, accordingly, GLI mRNA levels were also elevated. Ectopic expression of GLI1 or the constitutively active ΔNGLI2 mutant induced a distinct cobblestone-like morphology in LNCaP cells that, regarding the former, correlated with increased GLI2 as well as expression of the basal/stem-like markers CD44, ß1-integrin, ΔNp63 and BMI1, and decreased expression of the luminal marker AR (androgen receptor). LNCaP-GLI1 cells were viable in the presence of the AR inhibitor bicalutamide and gene expression profiling revealed that the transcriptome of LNCaP-GLI1 cells was significantly closer to DU145 and PC-3 cells than to control LNCaP-pBP (empty vector) cells, as well as identifying LCN2/NGAL as a highly induced transcript which is associated with hormone independence in breast and prostate cancer. Functionally, LNCaP-GLI1 cells displayed greater clonal growth and were more invasive than control cells but they did not form colonies in soft agar or prostaspheres in suspension suggesting that they do not possess inherent stem cell properties. Moreover, targeted suppression of GLI1 or GLI2 with siRNA did not reverse the transformed phenotype of LNCaP-GLI1 cells nor did double GLI1/GLI2 knockdowns activate AR expression in DU145 or PC-3 cells. As such, early targeting of the GLI oncoproteins may hinder progression to a hormone independent state but a more detailed understanding of the mechanisms that maintain this phenotype is required to determine if their inhibition will enhance the efficacy of anti-hormonal therapy through the induction of a luminal phenotype and increased dependency upon AR function.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Profiling , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Receptors, Androgen/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics , Androgens/metabolism , Blotting, Western , Cell Adhesion , Cell Line , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation , Cell Shape , Humans , Luciferases/genetics , Luciferases/metabolism , Male , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , RNA Interference , Receptors, Androgen/metabolism , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Zinc Finger Protein GLI1
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...