Left Ventricular "Longitudinal Rotation" and Conduction Abnormalities-A New Outlook on Dyssynchrony.

BACKGROUND: The complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB) results in ventricular dyssynchrony and a reduction in systolic and diastolic efficiency. We noticed a distinct clockwise rotation of the left ventricle (LV) in patients with CLBBB ("longitudinal rotation"). AIM: The aim of this study was to quantify the "longitudinal rotation" of the LV in patients with CLBBB in comparison to patients with normal conduction or complete right bundle branch block (CRBBB). METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients with normal QRS, CRBBB, or CLBBB were included. Stored raw data DICOM 2D apical-4 chambers view images cine clips were analyzed using EchoPac plugin version 203 (GE Vingmed Ultrasound AS, Horten, Norway). In EchoPac-Q-Analysis, 2D strain application was selected. Instead of apical view algorithms, the SAX-MV (short axis-mitral valve level) algorithm was selected for analysis. A closed loop endocardial contour was drawn to initiate the analysis. The "posterior" segment (representing the mitral valve) was excluded before finalizing the analysis. Longitudinal rotation direction, peak angle, and time-to-peak rotation were recorded. RESULTS: All patients with CLBBB (n = 21) had clockwise longitudinal rotation with mean four chamber peak rotation angle of -3.9 ± 2.4°. This rotation is significantly larger than in patients with normal QRS (-1.4 ± 3°, p = 0.005) and CRBBB (0.1 ± 2.2°, p = 0.00001). Clockwise rotation was found to be correlated to QRS duration in patients with the non-RBBB pattern. The angle of rotation was not associated with a lower ejection fraction or the presence of regional wall abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Significant clockwise longitudinal rotation was found in CLBBB patients compared to normal QRS or CRBBB patients using speckle-tracking echocardiography.

Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of patients in sinus rhythm, normal left ventricular function, and indeterminate diastolic function.

BACKGROUND: Diastolic dysfunction (DDFx) is the major underlying mechanism of heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (EF). Yet, the echocardiographic diagnosis of DDFx in patients in sinus rhythm is challenging and up to 25% of studies have discrepant measures making assessment of DDFx indeterminate. We aimed to describe the clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of patients with indeterminate diastolic function compared to patients with definite normal and abnormal diastolic function. METHODS: One thousand six hundred seventy-four patients were identified from the echocardiography database in sinus rhythm, EF ≥ 45% without wall-motion abnormalities, valvular, congenital heart diseases, cardiomyopathies or pulmonary disease. Patients were divided according to their lateral mitral E/E' ratio and left atrial systolic diameter: normal diastolic function (DFx) (left atrial systolic diameter [LASd] <40 mm, E/E' < 10), DDFx (LASd ≥ 40 mm, E/E' ≥ 10) and indeterminate DFx (discrepant LASd diameter and E/E' ratio). RESULTS: Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of the 3 groups, DDFx (n = 186), indeterminate diastolic function (IndtDFx) (n = 207), and normal diastolic function (NDFx) (n = 1281) were significantly different. IndtDFx demonstrated intermediate parameter abnormalities, largely overlapping with DDFx. LASd and E/E' were similarly associated with the inability to determine diastolic function. Age, female gender, renal failure, E/E' and pulmonary pressure were found to be independent predictors of heart failure symptoms (RR = 1.02, 1.5, 2.5, 1.1, 1.1, respectively, P < .0001, r = .35). CONCLUSION: Clinically and echocardiographically patients with IndtDFx are more closely related to DDfx than to NDFx. Although LAd was abnormal in IndtDFx it was not predictive of heart failure symptoms. Further study is suggested to establish whether LA function rather than its maximal size can provide additional information.

[EARLY RATHER THAN IMMEDIATE PCI IN NSTEMI; IS TIME EQUAL TO MUSCLE ONCE AGAIN?]

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines advocate immediate vs. non-immediate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategy in ST elevation vs. non ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI, NSTEMI). There is however increasing concern that "next-day PCI" in NSTEMI may adversely affect LV systolic and/or diastolic function and a more urgent aggressive approach should be taken in NSTEMI, similar to that in STEMI. In the current study we compared echocardiographic data between patients with STEMI and NSTEMI who had either primary or early PCI respectively. METHODS: Prospective data of 165 consecutive patients with an acute MI were analyzed. Patients had primary PCI if they had STEMI and non-emergent PCI if they had NSTEMI. Demographic information, laboratory test results, procedure time and post-PCI echocardiographic assessment were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Patients with STEMI were younger compared to patients with NSTEMI. Time to intervention was significantly longer in NSTEMI, reflecting guideline derived intervention strategy (1.9±1.7days, (median 1day) vs. 30±15min, for NSTEMI and STEMI, respectively, p<0.00001). Post-interventional LV systolic ejection fraction was better in NSTEMI compared to STEMI (53±14 vs. 48±13, respectively, p<0.05). Left atrial diameter, mitral inflow parameters and pulmonary arterial pressure were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to practice guidelines delaying PCI up to 72 hours in patients with NSTEMI did not adversely affect left ventricular systolic and/or diastolic function compared to immediate PCI in patients with STEMI. Based on current data, we conclude that early PCI intervention rather than an immediate one is appropriate in NSTEMI patients.

Comparison of echocardiographic parameters between pre-clinical and clinical advanced diastolic dysfunction patients.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction requires evidence of grade 2 or 3 (advanced) diastolic dysfunction (ADD), but many patients with ADD do not have clinical HF manifestations, hence termed pre-clinical diastolic dysfunction (PDD). The prevalence and characteristics of PDD in comparison to overt HF disease (clinical-ADD) are still debated. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 373 patients with LVEF≥45% and ADD in our echo-lab database. Exclusion criteria were acute coronary syndromes, ≥moderate valvular disease, cardiomyopathies or pericardial disease. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence/absence of HF symptoms, namely PDD (n=249) and clinical-ADD (n=124). Demographic, clinical and echocardiographic parameters were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Age, gender and comorbidities were similar between groups, with only a higher body mass index and renal failure significantly more prevalent in the clinical-ADD patients. Neither LV mass nor the ADD severity was related to the presence of symptoms; lateral mitral E/E' and pulmonary artery systolic pressure were significantly higher in clinical-ADD patients (14±5 vs. 12±4, p<0.05 and 40±13 vs. 36±11mmHg, p<0.05, respectively) and were the only parameters to correlate with the presence of symptoms of clinical-ADD in multivariable logistic regression (odds ratio=1.07 (CI 1.02-1.1, p=0.008) and 1.03 (CI 1.01-1.05, p=0.01), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients referred for an echocardiogram at a community cardiology center, PDD was twice as common as clinical-ADD. Hemodynamic parameters reflecting elevated filling and pulmonary pressures, rather than traditional comorbidities and/or classical structural abnormalities, were the only parameters related to the presence of HF symptoms.