The clinical utility of different quantitative methods for measuring treatment resistance in major depression.

BACKGROUND: Despite the acknowledged healthcare and economic burdens of chronic major depression, there is no agreed method to rate the degree to which patients are conceptualised as being refractory to treatment. There are a variety of tools which can be used to describe treatment resistance but their utility in clinical practice is uncertain. METHODS: We used a range of contemporary tools to rate the treatment histories of patients in a variety of care settings which included: primary care; affective disorders specialist clinics; patients receiving ECT; referrals to a tertiary affective disorders service; and patients undergoing neurosurgical treatment (vagus nerve stimulation or anterior cingulotomy) for chronic, refractory major depression. RESULTS: All tools demonstrated statistically significant differences in scores between care settings, as well as between tiers of service, although differences between some groups were small and confidence intervals were wide. The Massachusetts General Hospital staging method appeared to perform as well as more complex scoring methods and represents a reasonable compromise between time to complete and its ability to inform management decisions. LIMITATIONS: Numbers in some groups were low, but are likely to be representative. The ability of such tools to predict outcome was not examined and the proposed cut-offs require validation. CONCLUSIONS: Currently available staging methods appear to have the ability to differentiate between clinically-relevant sub-groups of patients with major depression. Further development of such tools is warranted due to their ability to not only describe characteristics of patients in different care settings, but also meet the need to have meaningful cut-offs which might guide referral to specialist treatment.

Long term outcome of thermal anterior capsulotomy for chronic, treatment refractory depression.

BACKGROUND: There is very limited evidence for the efficacy of any specific therapeutic intervention in chronic, treatment refractory major depression. Thermal anterior capsulotomy (ACAPS) is a rarely performed but established therapeutic procedure for this patient group. While benefit has been claimed, previous ACAPS reports have provided limited information. Detailed prospective reporting of therapeutic effects and side effects is required. OBJECTIVE: To report a prospective study of therapeutic effect, mental status, quality of life, social functioning and neurocognitive functioning in individuals with chronic treatment refractory major depression, treated with ACAPS. METHOD: A prospective case series of 20 patients treated with ACAPS between 1992 and 1999 were reassessed at a mean follow-up of 7.0±3.4 years. Data were collected preoperatively and at long term follow-up. Structural MRI was performed in 14 participants. RESULTS: According to a priori criteria, at long term follow-up, 50% were classified as 'responders' and 40% as 'remitters'. Fifty-five per cent were classified as 'improved'; 35% were 'unchanged'; and 10% had 'deteriorated'. Neurocognitive and personality testing were not significantly different at follow-up. A trend towards improvement in some aspects of executive neuropsychological functioning was observed. Significant adverse effects were infrequent and there were no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: ACAPS may represent an effective intervention for some patients with chronic, disabling, treatment refractory major depression that has failed to respond to other therapeutic approaches. The adverse effect burden within this population was modest, with no evidence of generalised impairment of neurocognitive functioning.