Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 19(11): 1291-9, 2004 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15482537

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Detection of an asymptomatic rise in the hepatic aminotransferase (ARHA) value has become a distinct and frequent clinical problem. We evaluated a three-step diagnostic algorithm in such patients for maximum yield. METHODS: Consecutive patients with an ARHA value 1.5-fold the upper limit of normal for at least 4 weeks and who were apparently healthy were included in the study. Each patient underwent standard biochemical investigations and a stepwise investigative protocol. In the first step, serological markers for hepatitis viruses, serum ferritin, 24-h urinary copper, alpha-1-antitrypsin phenotyping, and autoimmune markers were carried out. In step two, patients who tested negative for all the above markers had polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA. Patients without a diagnosis despite the above investigations underwent a liver biopsy as part of step three. RESULTS: Of 105 patients with ARHA, 38 were excluded for various reasons and 67 were included for the final analysis. The mean age was 35.11 +/- 11.96 years and 56 patients were men. The mean body mass index was 24.17 +/- 3.2 kg/m(2). The stepwise diagnostic algorithm achieved a diagnosis in 65/67 (97%) patients. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and chronic viral hepatitis were the most common diagnoses, in 24 (36%) patients each. Using the diagnostic algorithm a diagnosis was reached in 34% of patients with only serological and biochemical investigations, whereas PCR for HBV and HCV could further detect the presence of active HBV or HCV viremia in 21% (14/97) and a liver biopsy was necessary to establish the diagnosis in 28/67 (42%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: A stepwise diagnostic algorithm in patients with ARHA resulted in an optimal use of PCR and invasive tests such as liver biopsy. Cryptic HBV and HCV infection was frequent among these patients and PCR was necessary in such cases. NASH and chronic viral hepatitis were the most frequent causes of ARHA.


Subject(s)
Alanine Transaminase/blood , Liver Diseases/diagnosis , Liver/pathology , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Algorithms , Aspartate Aminotransferases/blood , Cohort Studies , DNA, Viral/analysis , Female , Hepatitis, Viral, Human/diagnosis , Humans , Liver Diseases/blood , Liver Diseases/virology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
2.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 18(7): 822-7, 2003 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12795755

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Universal vaccination against hepatitis A virus (HAV) has been recommended for children because of the changing epidemiological pattern of HAV. Vaccination has also been advised for patients with chronic liver disease as HAV superinfection in these patients can result in severe or even fatal disease. In India, the indications for HAV vaccination are not clear due to contradictory seroepidemiological data in children and lack of data on HAV seroprevalence in patients with chronic liver disease. METHODS: Sera were collected from children studying in two government-run schools and from patients with chronic liver disease attending the Liver Clinic at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS). The sera were tested for anti-HAV antibodies. The incidence of HAV-induced acute hepatitis and acute liver failure at AIIMS over the last 10 years was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 93.2% (1328/1424) of the school children between 4-18 years of age who were included in the study had anti-HAV antibody in their sera. Eighty percent of the children had antibodies against HAV in their sera by the age of 5 years, whereas all the children above 16 years were positive for anti-HAV antibody. A total of 256 patients with chronic liver disease (94 with cirrhosis of the liver, 160 with chronic hepatitis) were tested for the presence of anti-HAV antibody. Of them, 97.6% (248/254) had anti-HAV antibody in their sera. The annual frequency of HAV-induced acute viral hepatitis and acute liver failure at AIIMS during the last 10 years did not show any change. CONCLUSION: Mass vaccination against HAV is not required in north India because of the presence of protective antibodies against HAV in the majority of the population.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis A/epidemiology , Adolescent , Chi-Square Distribution , Child , Child, Preschool , Hepatitis A/immunology , Hepatitis A/prevention & control , Hepatitis A Vaccines/administration & dosage , Humans , India/epidemiology , Liver Diseases/epidemiology , Liver Diseases/virology , Seroepidemiologic Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...